Skip to main content

Simple Majority

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 6 Accesses

Definition

Simple majority (SM) is a voting system whereby the highest number of votes for one alternative within those under decision designates the winner. It may refer to a voting requirement of half of either all ballots cast or those voting on the given alternative plus one and also to the highest number of votes cast for any one alternative, while not constituting a majority.

Whenever a collective decision has to be taken, SM seems the natural way to reach a solution.

Various reasons for SM’s wide use have been given in the literature. May (1952), studying the issue of the relation between group choice and individual preferences in the presence of two alternatives, showed that SM is always: decisive (each set of individual preferences leads to a defined/unique group choice), egalitarian (interchanging any two preferences of the voters, the result is unchanged, which implies anonymity/equality of voters), neutral (it does not favor either alternative), and positively responsive...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York. 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Black D (1948) The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Borda JC (1781) Mémoires sur les élections au scrutin. In Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • de Condorcet M-J-A-N (1785) Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des decisions rendues à le pluralité des voix. De l’Imprimerie royale, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs A (1957) An economic theory of democracy. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte F (1985) Competitive democracy and fiscal constitution. Atl Econ J 13:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freixas J, Zwicker WS (2003) Weighted voting, abstention and multiple levels of approval. Soc Choice Welf 21:399–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freixas J, Zwicker WS (2009) Anonymous yes-no voting with abstention and multiple levels of approval. Games Econ Behav 67:428–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May KO (1952) A set of independent, necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decisions. Econometrica XX:680–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae DW (1967) The political consequences of electoral laws. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffini E (1976) Il principio maggioritario: profilo storico (1927). Adelphi, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MJ (1967) Proof of a theorem on majority rule. Behav Sci XIV:228–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1959) Some problems of majority voting. J Polit Econ LXVII:571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker WS (2009) Anonymous voting rules with abstention: weighted voting. In: Brams S, Gehrlein W, Roberts F (eds) The mathematics of preference, choice, and order: essays in honor of Peter C. Fishburn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 239–258

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Fedeli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Fedeli, S. (2019). Simple Majority. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_441

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics