Coastal Wetland Ecology and Challenges for Environmental Management

  • Anna R. Armitage
Reference work entry
Part of the The Plant Sciences book series (PLANTSCI, volume 8)


  • Coastal wetlands are plant communities at the land-sea interface. Two common types of coastal wetlands are salt marshes and mangrove swamps. Marshes are dominated by nonwoody grasses and shrubs; mangrove swamps are dominated by trees.

  • The global distribution of salt marshes and mangroves is governed by temperature: most mangrove species cannot tolerate freezing temperatures, so they grow in warmer tropical and subtropical latitudes. Marshes are more common in cooler temperate latitudes.

  • Salt marshes and mangroves overlap in some subtropical regions; these areas may experience shifts in species composition in response to climate change. The dynamics and ecological consequences of these shifts are important topics for future research.

  • Plants in coastal wetlands are adapted for abiotic stressors including prolonged inundation, which causes soil anoxia, and high salinity.

  • Salt marshes exhibit predictable zonation patterns, where the distribution of species within a site varies with small changes in elevation. These zonation patterns are driven by species-specific adaptations to abiotic stressors and by interspecific competition. Zonation patterns in mangrove swamps are more variable.

  • Coastal wetlands provide a variety of ecosystem services to human communities: wetlands can improve water quality, store nutrients, and buffer against erosion and storm surge and provide nursery habitat for commercially and recreationally important fishery species.

  • Current management issues in coastal wetlands include encroaching suburban and agricultural development, sea level rise, nutrient enrichment and eutrophication from agricultural runoff and treated sewage discharge, and freshwater diversion.

  • The policies regulating development on coastal wetlands are complex and dynamic. Restoration is the most common approach to mitigate for anthropogenic impacts. An understanding of wetland ecology is crucial to making wise decisions concerning the nature and direction of restoration projects.


Salt Marsh Storm Surge Coastal Wetland Mangrove Species Fiddler Crab 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baxter I, Hosmani PS, Rus A, Lahner B, Borevitz JO, Muthukumar B, Mickelbart MV, Schreiber L, Franke RB, Salt DE. Root suberin forms an extracellular barrier that affects water relations and mineral nutrition in Arabidopsis. Plos Genet. 2009;5:e1000492.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertness MD. Ribbed mussels and Spartina alterniflora production in a New England salt marsh. Ecology. 1984;65:1794–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertness MD. Fiddler crab regulation of Spartina alterniflora production on a New England salt marsh. Ecology. 1985;66:1042–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertness MD. Zonation of Spartina patens and Spartina alterniflora in a New England salt marsh. Ecology. 1991;72:138–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertness MD. The ecology of a New England salt marsh. Am Sci. 1992;80:260–8.Google Scholar
  6. Boston KG. The development of salt pans on tidal marshes, with particular reference to south-eastern Australia. J Biogeogr. 1983;10:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brody SD, Highfield WE, Ryu HC, Spanel-Weber L. Examining the relationship between wetland alteration and watershed flooding in Texas and Florida. Nat Hazards. 2007;40:413–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carver E. Birding in the United States: a demographic and economic analysis. Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation, report 2006-4, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Arlington; 2009Google Scholar
  9. Craft C. Freshwater input structures soil properties, vertical accretion, and nutrient accumulation of Georgia and U.S. tidal marshes. Limnol Oceanogr. 2007;52:1220–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Craft C, Reader J, Sacco JN, Broome SW. Twenty-five years of ecosystem development of constructed Spartina alterniflora (Loisel) marshes. Ecol Appl. 1999;9:1405–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craft C, Clough J, Ehman J, Joye S, Park R, Pennings S, Guo HY, Machmuller M. Forecasting the effects of accelerated sea-level rise on tidal marsh ecosystem services. Front Ecol Environ. 2009;7:73–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahl TE. Wetlands losses in the United States 1780s to 1980s. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service; 1990.Google Scholar
  13. Deegan LA, Johnson DS, Warren RS, Peterson BJ, Fleeger JW, Fagherazzi S, Wollheim WM. Coastal eutrophication as a driver of salt marsh loss. Nature. 2012;490:388–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doyle TW, Krauss KW, Conner WH, From AS. Predicting the retreat and migration of tidal forests along the northern Gulf of Mexico under sea-level rise. For Ecol Manage. 2010;259:770–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elmqvist T, Cox PA. The evolution of vivipary in flowering plants. Oikos. 1996;77:3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gedan KB, Kirwan ML, Wolanski E, Barbier EB, Silliman BR. The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: answering recent challenges to the paradigm. Clim Change. 2011;106:7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giri C, Ochieng E, Tieszen LL, Zhu Z, Singh A, Loveland T, Masek J, Duke N. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2011;20:154–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  19. Jordan TE, Valiela I. A nitrogen budget of the ribbed mussel, Geukensia demissa, and its significance in nitrogen flow in a New England salt marsh. Limnol Oceanogr. 1982;27:75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kruczynski WL. Mitigation and the Section 404 program: a perspective. In: Kusler JA, Kentula ME, editors. Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the science. Washington, DC: Island Press; 1990. p. 549–54.Google Scholar
  21. Lee RY, Joye SB. Seasonal patterns of nitrogen fixation and denitrification in oceanic mangrove habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2006;307:127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McKee KL. Soil physiochemical patterns and mangrove species distribution – reciprocal effects? J Ecol. 1993;81:477–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKee KL, Rooth JE. Where temperate meets tropical: multi-factorial effects of elevated CO2, nitrogen enrichment, and competition on a mangrove-salt marsh community. Glob Chang Biol. 2008;14:971–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Onuf CP, Teal JM, Valiela I. Interactions of nutrients, plant growth and herbivory in a mangrove ecosystem. Ecology. 1977;58:514–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Osland MJ, Enwright N, Day RH, Doyle TW. Winter climate change and coastal wetland foundation species: salt marshes versus mangrove forests in the southeastern U.S. Glob Chang Biol. 2013;19:1482–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Palmer MA, Ambrose RF, Poff NL. Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restor Ecol. 1997;5:291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pi N, Tam NFY, Wu Y, Wong MH. Root anatomy and spatial pattern of radial oxygen loss of eight true mangrove species. Aquat Bot. 2009;90:222–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sherman RE, Fahey TJ, Howarth RW. Soil-plant interactions in a neotropical mangrove forest: iron, phosphorus and sulfur dynamics. Oecologia. 1998;115:553–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stiven AE, Kuenzler EJ. The response of two salt marsh molluscs, Littorina irrorata and Geukensia demissa, to field manipulations of density and Spartina litter. Ecol Monogr. 1979;49:151–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thom BG. Coastal landforms and geomorphic processes. In: Snedaker SC, Snedaker JG, editors. The mangrove exosystem: research methods. Paris: Unesco; 1984. p. 3–17.Google Scholar
  31. Thursby GB, Abdelrhman MA. Growth of the marsh elder Iva frutescens in relation to duration of tidal flooding. Estuaries. 2004;27:217–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl. 1997;7:737–50.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Craft C, Megonigal P, Broome S, Stevenson J, Freese R, Cornell J, Zheng L, Sacco J. The pace of ecosystem development of constructed Spartina alterniflora marshes. Ecol Appl. 2003;13:1417–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dugan P. Wetlands in danger: a world conservation atlas. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  3. Engle VD. Estimating the provision of wetland services by Gulf of Mexico coastal wetlands. Wetlands. 2011;31:179–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mendelssohn IA, McKee KL, Patrick Jr WH. Oxygen deficiency in Spartina alterniflora roots: metabolic adaptation to anoxia. Science. 1981;214:439–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Perry CL, Mendelssohn IA. Ecosystem effects of expanding populations of Avicennia germinans in a Louisiana salt marsh. Wetlands. 2009;29:396–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rützler K, Feller IC. Caribbean mangrove swamps. Sci Am. 1996;274:94–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Saintilan N, Rogers K, McKee K. Salt marsh-mangrove interactions in Australasia and the Americas. In: Perillo GME, Wolanski E, Cahoon DR, Brinson MM, editors. Coastal wetlands: an integrated ecosystem approach. The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2009. p. 855–83.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marine BiologyTexas A&M University at GalvestonGalvestonUSA

Personalised recommendations