Introduction
The biological sciences are traditionally organized by scale (cells, tissues, organisms, populations, communities, ecosystems, etc.), taxonomic grouping (plants, animals, fungi, etc.), or process (competition, mutualism, evolution, etc.). In all of these organizational schemes, there has been a tendency to view the natural world as divided into two fundamentally different parts: humans and everything else. Even integrative fields such as ecology have often focused on “pristine” systems in the sense of trying to understand how ecosystems operate in the absence of human influence. Although the technique of using simplified systems to understand the fundamental properties of more complex systems has a long tradition in science (e.g., the idea of the frictionless plane developed by Galileo), the very act of simplifying the system alters the balancing and reinforcing feedback loops that have the potential to amplify or mute fundamental interactions between human actions and...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beddoe R, Costanza R, Farley J, Garza E, Kent J, Kubiszewski I, Martinez L, McCowen T, Murphy K, Myers N, Ogden Z, Stapleton K, Woodward J. Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: the evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(8):2483–9.
Berwick DM. A primer on leading the improvement of systems. Br Med J. 1996;312(7031):619–22. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2350403/
Bettencourt LMA, Kaurc J. Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(49):19540–5.
Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Díaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, Perrings C, Reid WV, Sarukhan J, Scholes RJ, Whyte A. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:1305–12.
Clark WC. Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:1737–8.
Daily GC, editor. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press; 1997.
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK. Global consequences of land use. Science. 2005;309(5734):570–4.
Kates RW. What kind of science is sustainability science? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(49):19449–50.
Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore III B, O’Riordan T, Svedin U. Sustainability science. Science. 2001;292(5517):641–42.
Lubchenco J. Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science. 1998;279:491–7.
MEA: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Available at http://www.unep.org/maweb/en/Framework.aspx (2003).
MEA: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Living beyond our means, natural assets and human well–being, statement from the board. Available at http://www.maweb.org/documents/document.429.aspx.pdf (2005a).
MEA: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios, vol 2. Available at http://www.unep.org/maweb/en/Scenarios.aspx (2005b).
MEA: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: multiscale assessments: findings of the Sub-global Assessments Working Group. Island Press. Available at http://www.unep.org/maweb/en/Multiscale.aspx (2005c).
Meadows DH. Thinking in systems. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing; 2008.
Mooney HA, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A. Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:3665–72.
NRC: National Research Council Board on Sustainable Development. Our common journey: a transition toward sustainability. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
Reid W, Berkes F, Wilbanks T, Capistrano D. Bridging scales and knowledge systems: concepts and applications in ecosystem assessment. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Island Press; 2006.
Stokes D. Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1997.
UNESCO. UNESCO and sustainable development. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001393/139369e.pdf (2005).
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 42/187. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/ares42-187.htm (1987). Accessed 11 Dec 1987.
UNWCED: United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future (Brundtland report). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf (1987).
Waddington CH. Tools for thought: how to understand and apply the latest scientific techniques of problem solving. New York: Basic Books; 1977.
Further Reading
Blewitt J, editor. Understanding sustainable development. London: Routledge; 2008.
Gunderson LH, Holling CS, editors. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2001.
Handl G. Declaration of the United Nations conference on the human environment. Audiovisual Library of International Law. http://untreaty.un.org/cod/avl/ha/dunche/dunche.html
IPCC. Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A, editors. Geneva: IPCC; 2007. 104 pp. Available at http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/syr/en/contents.html (2007).
Lynam T, Brown K. Mental models in human–environment interactions: theory, policy implications, and methodological explorations. Ecol Soc. 2012;17(3):24.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Available at http://www.niaid.nih.gov/topics/emerging/Pages/Default.aspx
Norberg J, Cumming GS, editors. Complexity theory for a sustainable future. New York: Columbia University Press; 2008.
Staudinger MD, Grimm NB, Staudt A, Carter SL, Chapin FS III, Kareiva P, et al. Impacts of climate change on biodiversity, ecosystems, and ecosystem services: technical input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment. Cooperative Report to the 2013 National Climate Assessment. 2012. 296 p. Available at http://assessment.globalchange.gov
United Nations. We can end poverty 2015, millennium development goals. Background. Available at http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/bkgd.shtml
Volk T. Gaia’s body: toward a physiology of earth. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2003.
Walker B, Salt D. Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2006.
Waltner-Toews D, Kay JJ, Lister NE. The ecosystem approach: complexity, uncertainty, and managing for sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press; 2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hamilton, J.G. (2014). Plant Ecology and Sustainability Science. In: Monson, R. (eds) Ecology and the Environment. The Plant Sciences, vol 8. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7501-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7501-9_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7500-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7501-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences