Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience

Living Edition
| Editors: Dieter Jaeger, Ranu Jung

Brain Machine Interface and Neuroimaging

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_523-1

Synonyms

Definition

Brain machine interfaces (BMIs) directly connect brain activity and devices outside the brain for such purposes as sensory substitution, motor compensation and enhancement, neurorehabilitation, suppression of maladaptive neural circuits, and treatment for brain lesions and neurological and psychiatric disorders. A BMI usually consists of some of the following electrical, mechanical, and computing elements: a brain activity measurement system (electrodes, amplifier, AD converter, etc.), a computer for decoding brain information and/or controlling stimuli to the brain, an effector system (prosthetic limb, rehabilitation robot, computer cursor, etc.), and a neural stimulation system.

Detailed Description

BMIs can be classified from at least the following three viewpoints. The first classification concerns which brain function is substituted, compensated, enhanced, or cured by BMI. Only three very basic functions are listed...

Keywords

Brain Computer Interface Slow Cortical Potential Brain Machine Interface Sensory Substitution Decoder Output 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Birbaumer N, Ghanayim N, Hinterberger T, Iversen I, Kotchoubey B, Kübler A, Perelmouter J, Taub E, Flor H (1999) A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature 398(6725):297–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chao ZC, Nagasaka Y, Fujii N (2010) Long-term asynchronous decoding of arm motion using electrocorticographic signals in monkeys. Front Neuroeng 3:3PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fetz EE (1969) Operant conditioning of cortical unit activity. Science 163(3870):955–958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Caminiti R, Massey JT (1982) On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex. J Neurosci 2(11):1527–1537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hochberg LR, Bacher D, Jarosiewicz B, Masse NY, Simeral JD, Vogel J, Haddadin S, Liu J, Cash SS, van der Smagt P, Donoghue JP (2012) Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature 485:372–375PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kawato M (2013) Plenary lecture: computational neuroscience approach to biomarkers and treatments for psychiatric diseases. In: WFSBP 2013, Kyoto, 27 JuneGoogle Scholar
  7. Miyawaki Y, Uchida H, Yamashita O, Sato MA, Morito Y, Tanabe HC, Sadato N, Kamitani Y (2008) Visual image reconstruction from human brain activity using a combination of multiscale local image decoders. Neuron 60(5):915–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Shibata K, Watanabe T, Sasaki Y, Kawato M (2011) Perceptual learning incepted by decoded fMRI neurofeedback without stimulus presentation. Science 334(6061):1413–1415PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shindo K, Kawashima K, Ushiba J, Ohta N, Ito M, Ota T, Kimura A, Liu M (2011) Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med 43(10):951–957PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Taylor DM, Tillery SI, Schwartz AB (2002) Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science 296(5574):1829–1832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wessberg J, Stambaugh CR, Kralik JD, Beck PD, Laubach M, Chapin JK, Kim J, Biggs SJ, Srinivasan MA, Nicolelis MA (2000) Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates. Nature 408(6810):361–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Yanagisawa T, Hirata M, Saitoh Y, Kishima H, Matsushita K, Goto T, Fukuma R, Yokoi H, Kamitani Y, Yoshimine T (2012) Electrocorticographic control of a prosthetic arm in paralyzed patients. Ann Neurol 71(3):353–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computational Neuroscience LaboratoriesATR Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory GroupKyotoJapan