Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience

Living Edition
| Editors: Dieter Jaeger, Ranu Jung

Accumulation of Evidence in Decision Making

  • Alexander C. Huk
  • Leor N. Katz
  • Jacob L. Yates
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_309-2


Accumulation of evidence in decision making is the process by which noisy sensory information is sequentially sampled until sufficient evidence has accrued to favor one decision over another or others.

Detailed Description

The accumulation of evidence over time is a central topic in computational neuroscience spanning behavior, brain, and theory (Huk and Meister 2012; Shadlen et al. 2006; Usher and McClelland 2001): (1) it is a fundamental aspect of tractable forms of cognition, such as simple forms of decision making; (2) mathematical models of how evidence could (and should) be accumulated are available and have a rich history of accounting for performance in laboratory tasks; and (3) there is an apparent disconnect between the hundreds of milliseconds over which animals can integrate evidence and the individual computing elements of the brain, neurons, which integrate their inputs over a small number of milliseconds.

Although accumulating evidence over time is a central...


Drift Rate Spike Rate Temporal Summation Temporal Accumulation Sequential Probability Ratio Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Bloch AM (1885) Expériences sur la vision. C R Seance Soc Biol Paris 37:493–495Google Scholar
  2. Bollimunta A, Totten D, Ditterich J (2012) Neural dynamics of choice: single-trial analysis of decision-related activity in parietal cortex. J Neurosci 32(37):12684–12701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Churchland AK, Kiani R, Chaudhuri R, Wang XJ, Pouget A, Shadlen MN (2011) Variance as a signature of neural computations during decision making. Neuron 69(4):818–831PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ding L, Gold JI (2012a) Separate, causal roles of the caudate in saccadic choice and execution in a perceptual decision task. Neuron 75:865–874PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ding L, Gold JI (2012b) Neural correlates of perceptual decision making before, during, and after decision commitment in monkey frontal eye field. Cereb Cortex 22:1052–1067PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ditterich J (2006) Stochastic models of decisions about motion direction: behavior and physiology. Neural Netw 19(8):981–1012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gold JI, Shadlen MN (2007) The neural basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci 30:535–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huk AC, Meister MLR (2012) Neural correlates and neural computations in posterior parietal cortex during perceptual decision-making. Front Integr Neurosci 6:86PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huk AC, Shadlen MN (2005) Neural activity in macaque parietal cortex reflects temporal integration of visual motion signals during perceptual decision making. J Neurosci 25(45):10420–10436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kiani R, Hanks TD, Shadlen MN (2008) Bounded integration in parietal cortex underlies decisions even when viewing duration is dictated by the environment. J Neurosci 28(12):3017–3029PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Link SW (1992) The wave theory of difference and similarity. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  12. Luce RD (1986) Response times. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Palmer J, Huk AC, Shadlen MN (2005) The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. J Vis 5(5):376–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ratcliff R (1978) A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol Rev 85(2):59–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ratcliff R, McKoon G (2008) The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput 20(4):873–922PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ratcliff R, Rouder JN (1998) Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychol Sci 9(5):347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ratcliff R, Hasegawa YT, Hasegawa RP, Smith PL, Segraves MA (2007) Dual diffusion model for single-cell recording data from the superior colliculus in a brightness-discrimination task. J Neurophysiol 97(2):1756–1774PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roitman JD, Shadlen MN (2002) Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. J Neurosci 22:9475–9489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Shadlen MN, Newsome WT (2001) Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 86:1916–1936PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shadlen MN, Hanks TD, Churchland AK, Kiani R, Yang T (2006) The speed and accuracy of a simple perceptual decision: a mathematical primer. In: Doya K, Ishii S, Rao R, Pouget A (eds) Bayesian brain: probabilistic approaches to neural coding. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 209–237Google Scholar
  21. Stone M (1960) Models for choice-reaction time. Psychometrika 25:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Usher M, McClelland JL (2001) The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev 108(3):550–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wald A (1947) Sequential analysis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Watson AB (1979) Probability summation over time. Vision Res 19(5):515–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wong K-F, Wang XJ (2006) A recurrent network mechanism of time integration in perceptual decisions. J Neurosci 26(4):1314–1328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander C. Huk
    • 1
  • Leor N. Katz
    • 1
  • Jacob L. Yates
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Neuroscience and Psychology, Center for Perceptual SystemsThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA