Skip to main content

Weak Coupling Theory

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience

Introduction

The theory of weak coupling (Kuramoto 1984; Kopell and Ermentrout 2002; Brown et al. 2004; Izhikevich 2007; Schwemmer and Lewis 2012) has been extremely helpful in developing our understanding of synchronization in neuronal networks. The theory allows one to reduce the dynamics of a weakly coupled network of neuronal oscillators to a system of equations involving only the phase of each oscillator. The resulting “phase models” are given in terms of the neurons’ infinitesimal phase response curves (iPRCs) and the input to the neuron via coupling. This article provides an explanation of how the phase models are derived and gives an example of how the theory can be used to determine phase-locking in a pair of neurons connected by reciprocal inhibition.

Model Neuronal Networks and Phase Models

A network of M weakly coupled heterogeneous neurons can be represented by

$$ \frac{d{X}_j}{ dt}=F\left({X}_j\right)+\varepsilon {\tilde{F}}_j\left({X}_j\right)+{\displaystyle...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brown E, Moehlis J, Holmes P (2004) On the phase reduction and response dynamics of neural oscillator populations. Neural Comput 16:673–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ermentrout GB (1981) n:m phase-locking of weakly coupled oscillators. J Math Biol 12:327–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermentrout GB (2002) Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynamical systems: a guide to XPPAUT for researchers and students. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ermentrout GB, Kopell N (1991) Multiple pulse interactions and averaging in systems of coupled neural oscillators. J Math Biol 29:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Guckenheimer J, Holmes P (1983) Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin A, Huxley A (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117:500–544

    PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Izhikevich EM (2007) Dynamical systems in neuroscience: the geometry of excitability and bursting, chapter 10. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopell N, Ermentrout GB (2002) Mechanisms of phase-locking and frequency control in pairs of coupled neural oscillators. In: Fiedl B (ed) Handbook on dynamical systems, vol 2, Toward applications. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 3–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuramoto Y (1984) Chemical oscillations, waves, and turbulence. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis TJ, Rinzel J (2003) Dynamics of spiking neurons connected by both inhibitory and electrical coupling. J Comput Neurosci 14:283–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malkin IG (1956) Some problems in nonlinear oscillation theory. Gostexizdat, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancilla JG, Lewis TJ, Pinto DJ, Rinzel J, Connors BW (2007) Synchronization of electrically coupled pairs of inhibitory interneurons in neocortex. J Neurosci 27(8):2058–2073

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris C, Lecar H (1981) Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber. Biophys J 35:193–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Netoff TI, Acker CD, Bettencourt JC, White JA (2005) Beyond two-cell networks: experimental measurement of neuronal responses to multiple synaptic inputs. J Comput Neurosci 18:287–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neu JC (1979) Coupled chemical oscillators. SIAM J Appl Math 37(2):307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor J, Holmes P (2010) Reflexes and preflexes: on the role of sensory feedback on rhythmic patterns in insect locomotion. Biol Cybern 102:513–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwemmer MA, Lewis TJ (2012) The theory of weakly coupled oscillators. In: Schultheiss NW, Prinz A, Butera RJ (eds) Phase response curves in neuroscience: theory, experiment, and analysis. Springer, New York, pp 3–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams TL, Bowtell G (1997) The calculation of frequency-shift functions for chains of coupled oscillators, with application to a network model of the lamprey locomotor pattern generator. J Comput Neurosci 4:47–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winfree AT (1980) The geometry of biological time. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zahid T, Skinner FK (2009) Predicting synchronous and asynchronous network groupings of hippocampal interneurons coupled with dendritic gap junctions. Brain Res 1262:115–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Lewis TJ (2013) Phase response properties of half-center oscillators. J Comput Neurosci 35:55–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy J. Lewis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: Computing the iPRC Using the Adjoint Method

Appendix 1: Computing the iPRC Using the Adjoint Method

As mentioned previously, the major practical asset of the singular perturbation approach to deriving phase models (Malkin 1956; Neu 1979; Ermentrout 1981) is that it provides a method to efficiently compute the iPRC for model neurons. Specifically, the iPRC is a T-period solution to

$$ \frac{ dZ}{ dt}=- DF{\left({X}_{LC}(t)\right)}^TZ $$
(16)

subject to the normalization constraint

$$ Z(0)\cdot {X}_{LC}^{\prime }(0)=1. $$
(17)

This equation is the adjoint equation for the unperturbed model neuron (Eq. 1) with ε = 0, i.e., \( \frac{ dX}{ dt}=F(X)\Big) \) linearized around the limit cycle solution X LC (t).

In practice, the solution to Eq. 16 is found by integrating the equation backwards in time (Williams and Bowtell 1997). The adjoint system has the opposite stability of the original system Eq. 1, which has an asymptotically stable T-periodic limit cycle solution. Thus, we integrate backwards in time from an arbitrary initial condition so as to dampen out the transients and arrive at the (unstable) periodic solution of Eq. 16. To obtain the iPRC, we normalize the periodic solution using Eq. 17. This algorithm is automated in the software package XPPAUT (Ermentrout 2002), which is available for free on Bard Ermentrout’s webpage www.math.pitt.edu/~bard/bardware/.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science Business Media New York (outside the USA)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lewis, T.J., Schwemmer, M.A. (2014). Weak Coupling Theory. In: Jaeger, D., Jung, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_271-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_271-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7320-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics