Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience

Living Edition
| Editors: Dieter Jaeger, Ranu Jung

Subthreshold Antiresonance and Antiphasonance in Single Neurons: 3D Models

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_100659-1



Subthreshold (or membrane potential) antiresonance refers to the ability of neurons to exhibit a minimum in their voltage amplitude response to oscillatory input currents at a nonzero input (antiresonant) frequency.

Subthreshold (or membrane potential) antiphasonance refers to the ability of neurons to exhibit a zero-phase (or zero-phase-shift) response to oscillatory inputs currents at a nonzero (antiphasonant) frequency separating between delayed and advance responses for frequencies smaller and larger than the antiphasonant frequency, respectively.

Linear subthreshold antiresonance and antiphasonance refers to the occurrence of these phenomena in linear systems.

In this article, we focus on the description of antiresonance and antiphasonance in 3D linearized...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.



The author wishes to thank Farzan Nadim, David Fox and Eran Stark for useful comments.

This work was supported by NSF grants DMS-1313861 (HGR) and CRCNS-DMS-1608077 (HGR).

The author is grateful to the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences at New York University.


  1. Boyce WE, DiPrima RC (2009) Elementary differential equations and boundary value problems. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  2. Fox DM, Rotstein HG, Nadim F (2016) Neuromodulation produces complex changes in resonance profiles of neurons in an oscillatory network. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 811.08Google Scholar
  3. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conductance and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117:500–544CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Hu H, Vervaeke K, Storm JF (2002) Two forms of electrical resonance at theta frequencies generated by M-current, h-current and persistent Na+ current in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells. J Physiol 545(3):783–805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Hu H, Vervaeke K, Graham JF, Storm LJ (2009) Complementary theta resonance filtering by two spatially segregated mechanisms in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 29:14472–14483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hutcheon B, Yarom Y (2000) Resonance, oscillations and the intrinsic frequency preferences in neurons. Trends Neurosci 23:216–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Izhikevich E (2006) Dynamical systems in neuroscience: the geometry of excitability and bursting. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Pike FG, Goddard RS, Suckling JM, Ganter P, Kasthuri N, Paulsen O (2000) Distinct frequency preferences of different types of rat hippocampal neurons in response to oscillatory input currents. J Physiol 529:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Richardson MJE, Brunel N, Hakim V (2003) From subthreshold to firing-rate resonance. J Neurophysiol 89:2538–2554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rotstein HG (2017a) Resonance modulation, annihilation and generation of antiresonance and antiphasonance in 3d neuronal systems: interplay of resonant and amplifying currents with slow dynamics. J Comput Neurosci 43:35–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rotstein HG (2017b) The shaping of intrinsic membrane potential oscillations: positive/negative feedback, ionic resonance/amplification, nonlinearities and time scales. J Comput Neurosci 42:133–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rotstein HG, Oppermann T, White JA, Kopell N (2006) A reduced model for medial entorhinal cortex stellate cells: subthreshold oscillations, spiking and synchronization. J Comput Neurosci 21:271–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Schreiber S, Erchova I, Heinemann U, Herz AV (2004) Subthreshold resonance explains the frequency-dependent integration of periodic as well as random stimuli in the entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol 92:408–415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Skinner FK (2006) Conductance-based models. Scholarpedia 1:1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federated Department of Biological SciencesRutgers University and New Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Brain and Neuroscience ResearchNew Jersey Institute of Technology and Rutgers UniversityNewarkUSA