Skip to main content

Quality of Social Network Data

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining

Synonyms

Accuracy; Reliability; Validity

Glossary

Accuracy:

Extent to which the perceived (cognitive) network corresponds to the “actual” (behavioral) network

Attenuation:

Extent to which relationships among variables are lower than they should be as a result of measurement error

Cognitive Interview:

In-depth interview conducted with the aim of understanding the mental process through which the respondent understands the question and produces the answer

Measurement:

Assignment of numbers to objects according to rules

Measurement Error:

Discrepancy between a true and observed characteristic. It may be random (lack of reliability) or systematic (lack of validity)

Operationalization:

Assignment of empirical indicators (e.g., survey questions) to a theoretical variable to be measured

Pearson Correlation Coefficient:

Statistical measure of association between two numeric variables which are assumed to be linearly related, ranging from 1 (perfect linear positive relationship) to −1 (perfect...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bernard HR, Killworth PD (1977) Informant accuracy in social network data II. Hum Commun Res 4:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard HR, Killworth PD, Sailer L (1979/1980) Informant accuracy in social network data IV: a comparison of clique-level structure in behavioral and cognitive network data. Soc Netw 2:191–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard HR, Killworth PD, Sailer L (1982) Informant accuracy in social network data V: an experimental attempt to predict actual communication from recall data. Soc Sci Res 11:30–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard HR, Killworth PD, Kronenfeld D, Sailer L (1985) On the validity of retrospective data. Annu Rev Anthropol 13:495–517. Palo Alto, Stanford University Press

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondonio D (1998) Predictors of accuracy in perceiving informal social networks. Soc Netw 20:301–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callegaro M, Lozar-Manfreda K, Vehovar V (2015) Web survey methodology. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril H (1944) Gauging public opinion. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casciaro T (1998) Seeing things clearly: social structure, personality and accuracy in social network perception. Soc Netw 20:331–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenders G, Hlebec V, Kogovšek T (2011) Measurement quality in indicators of compositions: a compositional multitrait-multimethod approach. Surv Res Methods 5:63–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Coromina L, Coenders G (2006) Reliability and validity of egocentered network data collected via web: a metaanalysis of multilevel multitrait multimethod studies. Soc Netw 28:209–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferligoj A, Hlebec V (1999) Evaluation of social network measurement instruments. Soc Netw 21:111–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LC, Romney AK (1987) Words, deeds and social structure: a preliminary study of the reliability of informants. Hum Organ 46:330–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LC, Romney AK, Freeman SC (1987) Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. Am Anthropol 89:311–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlebec V, Ferligoj A (2001) Respondent mood and the instability of survey network measurements. Soc Netw 23:125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlebec V, Kogovšek T (2013) Different approaches to measure ego-centered social support networks: a meta-analysis. Qual Quant 47:3435–3455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killworth PD, Bernard HR (1976) Informant accuracy in social network data. Hum Organ 3:269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killworth PD, Bernard HR (1979/1980) Informant accuracy in social network data III: a comparison of triadic structure in behavioral and cognitive data. Soc Netw 2:10–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogovšek T (2006) Reliability and validity of measuring social support networks by the web and telephone. Metodološki Zvezki 3:239–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogovšek T, Ferligoj A (2005) Effects on reliability and validity of egocentered network measurements. Soc Netw 27:205–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogovšek T, Hlebec V (2008) Measuring ego-centered social networks: do cheaper methods with low respondent burden provide good estimates of network composition? Metodološki Zvezki 5:127–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogovšek T, Ferligoj A, Saris WE, Coenders G (2002) Estimating the reliability and validity of personal support measures: full information ML estimation with planned incomplete data. Soc Netw 24:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogovšek T, Coenders G, Hlebec V (2013) Predictors and outcomes of social network compositions: a compositional structural equation modeling approach. Soc Netw. 35:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2012.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt D (1987) Cognitive social structures. Soc Netw 9:109–134

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lozar Manfreda K, Koren G, Vehovar V, Hlebec V (2004a) Collecting data on ego-centered social networks on the web: methodological issues. In: SUNBELT XXIV international social network conference, Portorož, 12–16 May 2004, p 162

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozar Manfreda K, Vehovar V, Hlebec V (2004b) Collecting ego-centered network data via the web. Metodološki zvezki 1:295–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden PV (1993) The reliability of network density and composition measures. Soc Netw 15:399–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan DL, Neal MB, Carder P (1997) The stability of core and peripheral networks over time. Soc Netw 19:9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadoh J, Podreberšek P, Hlebec V (2004) Cognitive evaluation of the hierarchical approach for measuring ego-centered social networks. Metodološki Zvezki 1:379–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison P (1994) Social cognition in context: some applications of social network analysis. In: Wasserman S, Galaskiewicz J (eds) Advances in social network analysis: research in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 79–109

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ, Tolosana-Delgado R (2015) Modeling and analysis of compositional data. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaux A (1988) Social support, theory, research, and intervention. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehovar V, Lozar Manfreda K, Koren G, Hlebec V (2008) Measuring ego-centered social networks on the web: questionnaire design issues. Soc Netw 30:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemljič B, Hlebec V (2005) Reliability of measures of centrality and prominence. Soc Netw 27:73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Recommended Reading

  • Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Groves RM, Fowler FJ Jr, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R (2009) Survey methodology. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schuman H, Presser S (1996) Questions and answers in attitude surveys: experiments on question form, order and context. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Schwarz N (1996) Thinking about answers: the application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Germà Coenders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Coenders, G., Kogovšek, T., Hlebec, V., Coromina, L. (2017). Quality of Social Network Data. In: Alhajj, R., Rokne, J. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_398-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_398-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7163-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7163-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics