Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining

Living Edition
| Editors: Reda Alhajj, Jon Rokne

Origins of Social Network Analysis

  • David Knoke
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_362-1

Synonyms

Interpersonal relations; Link analysis; Relational analysis; Social interaction; Social structural analysis

Glossary

Dyad:

Two actors and one or more relations among them

Field Observation:

The collection of information in natural social settings

Social Network:

A set of actors and the set of relations among them

Social Network Analysis:

Methods for collecting and analyzing data on actors and their relations

Sociometry:

Methods for measuring social relations in a small group

Sociogram:

A diagram of labeled points and lines representing a set of relations among individuals in a small group

Tertius Gaudens:

(“the third who benefits”) A third party who affects a relation between two other parties

Triad:

three actors and one or more relations among them

Origins of Social Network Analysis

Social network analysis originated during the first half of the twentieth century in the disciplines of psychology, sociology, social psychology, and anthropology. Core concepts and principles of...

Keywords

Social Network Analysis Informal Relation Triad Member French Sociology Business School Faculty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Linton C. Freeman for his valuable counsel in developing the set of topics for the history of social network analysis appearing in the Encyclopedia. He was unable to write this entry, but his researches on the era remain an indispensable guide to the origins of the field.

References

  1. Almack JC (1922) The influence of intelligence on the selection of associates. School Soc 16:529–530Google Scholar
  2. Bott HM (1928) Observations of play activities in a nursery school. Genet Psychol Monogr 4:44–88Google Scholar
  3. Davis A, Gardner BB, Gardner MR (1941) Deep south: a social anthropology of caste and class. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Freeman LC (1996) Some antecedents of social network analysis. Connections 19:1–42Google Scholar
  5. Freeman LC (2003) Finding social groups: a meta analysis of the southern women data. In: Breiger R, Carely K, Pattison P (eds) Dynamic social network modeling and analysis. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 39–77Google Scholar
  6. Freeman LC (2004) The development of social network analysis: a study in the sociology of science. Empirical, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  7. Hagman EP (1933) The companionships of preschool children. Univ Iowa Stud Child Welf 7:10–69Google Scholar
  8. Homans GC (1950) The human group. Harcourt/Brace, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Moreno JL (1932) Application of the group method to classification. National Committee on Prisons and Prison Labor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Moreno JL (1934) Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Nervous and Mental Disease, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moreno JL, Jennings HH (1938) Statistics of social configurations. Sociometry 1:342–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson WJ (1939) Management and the worker. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Scott J (1991) Social network analysis: a handbook. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Simmel G (1950 [1908]) The sociology of georg simmel. compiled and translated by Kurt Wolff. Free Press, GlencoeGoogle Scholar
  15. Simmel G (1955 [1922]) Conflict and the web of group affiliations. Kurt W, Reinhard B (Trans, eds) Free Press, GlencoeGoogle Scholar
  16. Warner WL, Lunt PS (1941) The social life of a modern community. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  17. Wellman B (1926) The school child’s choice of companions. J Educ Res 14:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA