Skip to main content

Spam Detection, E-mail/Social Network

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining
  • 59 Accesses

Synonyms

Junk e-mail; Social spam; Unsolicited bulk e-mail

Glossary

Spam:

Unsolicited, unwanted message intended to be delivered to an indiscriminate target, directly or indirectly, notwithstanding measures to prevent its delivery

Spammer:

Originator of spam message

Spam Filter:

An automated tool that is built to detect spam message with the purpose of preventing its delivery

Whitelist:

A list of contacts whose e-mails should be delivered

Blacklist:

A list of contacts whose e-mails are deemed to be spam

Classifier:

A model that identifies which of a set of categories an object belongs to

Definition

Spam generally refers to “unsolicited, unwanted message intended to be delivered to an indiscriminate target, directly or indirectly, notwithstanding measures to prevent its delivery” (Cormack 2008). While e-mail spam is the mostly widely recognized form of spam, spam actually pervades many existing information systems and social media, including instant messaging (Paulson 2004), blogs...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abu-Nimeh S, Chen T (2010) Proliferation and detection of blog spam. IEEE Secur Priv 8(5):42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykin PO, Roychowdhury VP (2005) Leveraging social networks to fight spam. Computer 38(4):61–68. doi:10.1109/MC.2005.132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang M, Yih W, McCann R (2008) Personalized spam filtering for gray mail. In: Proceedings of the fifth conference on email and anti-spam (CEAS ‘08), Mountain View

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormack GV (2008) Email spam filtering: a systematic review. Found Trends Inf Retr 1(4):335–455

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dalvi N, Domingos P, Mausam SS, Verma D (2004) Adversarial classification. In: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '04. ACM, New York, pp 99–108. doi:10.1145/1014052.1014066. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1014052.1014066

    Google Scholar 

  • Firte L, Lemnaru C, Potolea R (2010) Spam detection filter using KNN algorithm and resampling. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on intelligent computer communication and processing (ICCP ‘10), Cluj-Napoca

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher D (2009) A brief history of spam. Time. http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,193 3796,00.html

  • Fowler GA, Raice S, Efrati A (2012) Spam finds new target: Facebook and Twitter build up their defenses as hackers attack social networks. The Wall Street Journal

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyöngyi Z, Garcia-Molina H (2005) Web spam taxonomy. In: First international workshop on adversarial information retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb ‘05), Chiba

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann P, Koutrika G, Garcia-Molina H (2007) Fighting spam on social web sites: a survey of approaches and future challenges. IEEE Internet Comput 11(6):36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irani D, Webb S, Pu C (2010) Study of static classification of social spam profiles in MySpace. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on weblogs and social media, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings R (2009) Cost of spam is flattening: our 2009 predictions. Ferris research. http://email-museum.com/2009/01/28/cost-of-spam-is-flattening-our-2009-predictions/

  • Jin X, Lin CX, Luo J, Han J (2011) Socialspamguard: a data mining-based spam detection system for social media networks. PVLDB 4(12):1458–1461

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson LD (2004) Spam hits instant messaging. Computer 37(4). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos

    Google Scholar 

  • Phuoc TT, Po-Hsiang T, Tony J (2008) An adjustable combination of linear regression and modified probabilistic neural network for anti-spam filtering. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on pattern recognition, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahami M, Dumais S, Heckerman D, Horvitz E (1998) A bayesian approach to filtering junk E-mail. In: Learning for text categorization: papers from the 1998 workshop, AAAI Technical Report WS-98-05, Madison. citeseer.ist.psu.edu/sahami98bayesian.html

  • Sebastiani F (2002) Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput Surv 34(1):1–47. doi:10.1145/505282.505283. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/505282.505283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin Y, Gupta M, Myers SA (2011) Prevalence and mitigation of forum spamming. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE international conference on computer communications, Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhu J, Yao T (2004) An evaluation of statistical spam filtering techniques. ACM Trans Asian Lang Inf Process 3(4):243–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cailing Dong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Dong, C., Zhou, B. (2016). Spam Detection, E-mail/Social Network. In: Alhajj, R., Rokne, J. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_294-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_294-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7163-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7163-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics