Hip Arthroscopy: Portal Placement

  • Geoffrey D. Abrams
  • Joshua D. Harris
  • Marc R. Safran
Reference work entry


The indications for hip arthroscopy are expanding. Initially, works within the central and peripheral compartments were described using a combination of three portals: anterolateral, anterior, and posterolateral. The anterolateral portal is typically the first portal made and is the only portal created without direct visualization. Fluoroscopy and tactile sensation are used to guide the spinal needle and cannula into the correct location, but iatrogenic chondral and labral injuries are potential risks. The anterior portal is in greatest proximity to a neurovascular structure, with the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve located more than 3 mm away. The mid-anterior portal is becoming more popular as it offers similar visualization as the anterior portal yet is more distant from the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and offers an improved trajectory for suture anchor placement in labral repairs. Accessory portals and peritrochanteric space portals offer viewing and working abilities to address pathologies such as internal and external snapping hips, ischiofemoral impingement, gluteus medius and minimus repairs, and trochanteric bursectomy.


Femoral Head Great Trochanter Anterior Superior Iliac Spine Peripheral Compartment Gluteus Medius 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Roy DR. Arthroscopy of the hip in children and adolescents. J Child Orthop. 2009;3:89–100.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wagner FV, Negrao JR, Campos J, et al. Capsular ligaments of the hip: anatomic, histologic, and positional study in cadaveric specimens with MR arthrography. Radiology. 2012;263:189–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Telleria JJ, Lindsey DP, Giori NJ, et al. An anatomic arthroscopic description of the hip capsular ligaments for the hip arthroscopist. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:628–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dienst M, Seil R, Kohn DM. Safe arthroscopic access to the central compartment of the hip. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1510–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seldes RM, Tan V, Hunt J, et al. Anatomy, histologic features, and vascularity of the adult acetabular labrum. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;382:232–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferguson SJ, Bryant JT, Ganz R, et al. The acetabular labrum seal: a poroelastic finite element model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000;15:463–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferguson SJ, Bryant JT, Ganz R, et al. An in vitro investigation of the acetabular labral seal in hip joint mechanics. J Biomech. 2003;36:171–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crawford MJ, Dy CJ, Alexander JW, et al. The 2007 Frank Stinchfield Award. The biomechanics of the hip labrum and the stability of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:16–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Safran MR. The acetabular labrum: anatomic and functional characteristics and rationale for surgical intervention. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:338–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Song Y, Ito H, Kourtis L, et al. Articular cartilage friction increases in hip joints after the removal of acetabular labrum. J Biomech. 2012;45:524–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pollard TC, Khan T, Price AJ, et al. Simulated hip arthroscopy skills: learning curves with the lateral and supine patient positions: a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harris JD, McCormick FM, Abrams GD, et al. Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:589–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Byrd JW. Avoiding the labrum in hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:770–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clarke MT, Arora A, Villar RN. Hip arthroscopy: complications in 1054 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;406:84–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Byrd JW, Pappas JN, Pedley MJ. Hip arthroscopy: an anatomic study of portal placement and relationship to the extra-articular structures. Arthroscopy. 1995;11:418–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robertson WJ, Kelly BT. The safe zone for hip arthroscopy: a cadaveric assessment of central, peripheral, and lateral compartment portal placement. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:1019–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Byrd JW. Hip arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:433–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sussmann PS, Zumstein M, Hahn F, et al. The risk of vascular injury to the femoral head when using the posterolateral arthroscopy portal: cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1112–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Voos JE, Rudzki JR, Shindle MK, et al. Arthroscopic anatomy and surgical techniques for peritrochanteric space disorders in the hip. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1246.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey D. Abrams
    • 1
  • Joshua D. Harris
    • 2
    • 4
  • Marc R. Safran
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryStanford UniversityPalo AltoUSA
  2. 2.Houston Methodist Center for Orthopaedics & Sports MedicineHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Stanford University School of MedicineRedwood CityUSA
  4. 4.Rush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations