Agricultural Entrepreneurship

  • Thomas LansEmail author
  • Pieter Seuneke
  • Laurens Klerkx
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_496-2

Synonyms

Why Agricultural Entrepreneurship?

Traditionally, agriculture is seen as a low-tech industry with limited dynamics dominated by numerous small family firms which are mostly focused on doing things better rather than doing new things. Over the last decade, this situation has changed dramatically due to economic liberalization, a reduced protection of agricultural markets, and a fast changing, more critical, society. Agricultural companies increasingly have to adapt to market changes (e.g., boycotts), changing consumer habits (e.g., organic/local food), more strict environmental regulations, food safety and product quality, biotechnology, big-data, value chain integration, sustainability, and so on. These changes have spurred new entrants, innovation, and new cycles of entrepreneurship within existing firms. It is recognized by politicians, practitioners, as well as scientists that farmers and growers increasingly require...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alsos GA, Carter S, Ljunggren E, Welter F, editors. The handbook of research on entrepreneurship in agriculture and rural development. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar; 2011.Google Scholar
  2. Bock BB. Fitting in and multi-tasking: Dutch farm women’s strategies in rural entrepreneurship. Sociol Rural. 2004;44(3):245–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carter S. Multiple business ownership in the farm sector: assessing the enterprise and employment contributions of farmers in Cambridgeshire. J Rural Stud. 1999;15(4):417–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DeTienne DR, Chandler GN. Opportunity identification and its role in the entrepreneurial classroom: a pedagogical approach and empirical test. Acad Manag Learn Educ. 2004;3(3):242–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dieleman H. Urban agriculture in Mexico City: balancing between ecological, economic, social and symbolic value. J Clean Prod. 2016.Google Scholar
  6. Gartner WB. ‘Who is an entrepreneur?’ Is the wrong question. Entrep Theory Pract. 1989;13:47–68.Google Scholar
  7. Gasson R, Crow G, Errington A, Hutson J, Marsden T, Winter M. The farm as a family business: a review. J Agr Econ. 1988;39:1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hassink J, Hulsink W, Grin J. Entrepreneurship in agriculture and healthcare: different entry strategies of care farmers. J Rural Stud. 2016;43:27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hulsink W, Dons H, Lans T, Blok V. Boosting entrepreneurship education within the knowledge network of the Dutch agri-food sciences: the new ‘Wageningen’approach. In: Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2014. p. 248–278.Google Scholar
  10. Jaskiewicz P, Combs JG, Rau SB. Entrepreneurial legacy: toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. J Bus Ventur. 2015;30(1):29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jervell AM. The family farm as a premise for entrepreneurship. In: Alsos GA, Carter S, Ljunggren AE, Welter F, editors. The handbook of research on entrepreneurship in agriculture and rural development. Cheltenham/Northhampton: Edward Elgar; 2011.Google Scholar
  12. Katz JA. Education and training in entrepreneurship. In: The psychology of entrepreneurship. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 2007. p. 209–35.Google Scholar
  13. Kilelu CW, Klerkx L, Leeuwis C. Supporting smallholder commercialisation by enhancing integrated coordination in agrifood value chains: experiences with dairy hubs in Kenya. Exp Agric. 2017;53(2):269–287.Google Scholar
  14. Klerkx L, Jansen J. Building knowledge systems for sustainable agriculture: supporting private advisors to adequately address sustainable farm management in regular service contacts. Int J Agric Sustain. 2010;8(3):148–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klerkx L, Leeuwis C. The emergence and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2009a;76(6):849–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klerkx L, Leeuwis C. Shaping collective functions in privatized agricultural knowledge and information systems: the positioning and embedding of a network broker in the Dutch dairy sector. J Agric Educ Ext. 2009b;15(1):81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klerkx L, Proctor A. Beyond fragmentation and disconnect: networks for knowledge exchange in the English land management advisory system. Land Use Policy. 2013;30(1):13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lans T, Biemans H, Verstegen J, Mulder M. The influence of the work environment on entrepreneurial learning of small-business owners. Manag Learn. 2008;39(5):597–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lans T, Verhees F, Verstegen J. Social competence in small firms—fostering workplace learning and performance. Hum Resour Dev Q. 2016;27(3):321–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lumpkin GT, Dess GG. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. J Bus Venturing. 2001;16(5):429–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McClelland DC. The achieving society. New York: First Free Press; 1967.Google Scholar
  22. McElwee G. A taxonomy of entrepreneurial farmers. Int J Entrep Small Bus. 2008;6:465–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller D. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Manag Sci. 1983;29(7):770–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitchell RK, Lowell-Busenitz TL, McDougall PP, Morse EA, Brock Smith J. Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research. Entrep Theory Pract. 2002;27:93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Phillipson J, Gorton M, Raley M, Moxey A. Treating farms as firms? The evolution of farm business support from productionist to entrepreneurial models. Environ Plan C Govern Policy. 2004;22(1):31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pindado E, SÃnchez M. Researching the entrepreneurial behaviour of new and existing ventures in European agriculture. Small Business Economics; 2017. p. 1–24.Google Scholar
  27. Poulton C, Dorward A, Kydd J. The future of small farms: new directions for services, institutions, and intermediation. World Dev. 2010;38:1413–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pyysiäinen J, Anderson A, McElwee G, Vesala K. Developing the entrepreneurial skills of farmers: some myths explored. Int J Entrep Behav Res. 2006;12:21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rauch A, Wiklund J, Lumpkin GT, Frese M. Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrep Theory Pract. 2009;33(3):761–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schumpeter JA. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard; 1934.Google Scholar
  31. Seuneke P, Bock BB. Exploring the roles of women in the development of multifunctional entrepreneurship on family farms: an entrepreneurial learning approach. NJAS. 2015;74–75:41–50.Google Scholar
  32. Seuneke P, Lans T, Wiskerke JSC. Moving beyond entrepreneurial skills: key factors driving entrepreneurial learning in multifunctional agriculture. J Rural Stud. 2013;32:208–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shane S, Venkataraman S. The promise of enterpreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manag Rev. 2000;25(1):217–26.Google Scholar
  34. Suess-Reyes J, Fuetsch E. The future of family farming: a literature review on innovative, sustainable and succession-oriented strategies. J Rural Stud. 2016;47:117–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van der Ploeg JD. Styles of farming: an introductory note on concepts and methodology. In: van der Ploeg JD, Long A, editors. Born from within: practice and perspectives of endogeneous rural development. Assen: Royal van Gorcum; 1994.Google Scholar
  36. van der Ploeg JD, Long A, Banks J, editors. Living countrysides, rural development processes in Europe: the state of the art. Doetinchem: Elsevier; 2002.Google Scholar
  37. Verhees F, Lans T, Verstegen J. The influence of market- and entrepreneurial orientation on strategic marketing choices: the cases of Dutch farmers and horticultural growers. J Chain Network Sci. 2012;2:167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vesala KM, Peura J, McElwee G. The split entrepreneurial identity of the farmer. J Small Bus Enterp Dev. 2007;14(1):48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Westhead P, Ucbasaran D, Wright M, Binks M. Novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneur behaviour and contributions. Small Bus Econ. 2005;25:109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wiklund J, Shepherd D. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. J Bus Venturing. 2005;20(1):71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson GA. From ‘weak’ to ‘strong’ multifunctionality: conceptualising farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways. J Rural Stud. 2008;24(3):367–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Woo CY, Cooper AC, Dunkelberg WC. The development and interpretation of entrepreneurial typologies. J Bus Venturing. 1991;6(2):93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Education and Competence Studies GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Aeres University of Applied Sciences WageningenWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Knowledge, Technology and Innovation GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Section editors and affiliations

  • Evangelos (Vangelis) Grigoroudis
    • 1
  1. 1.Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Production Engineering and ManagementTechnical University of CreteChaniaGreece