Skip to main content

Applied Design Thinking Lab and Creative Empowering of Interdisciplinary Teams

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship
  • 156 Accesses

Synonyms

Art education; Artistic research; Creativity; Design education; Entrepreneurship; Innovation; Innovation diplomacy; Invention; Social design; Work in teams

Introduction

Applied Design Thinking Lab (ADTL), Vienna

The Applied Design Thinking Lab (ADTL), Vienna, is situated at the University of Applied Arts in Vienna and was founded by the author in 2009. It might be understood as an application model for universities, companies, and institutions of all kind, as it can be considered as a “hypothesis and action model.” Since 2004, the author followed the vision of inter-/transdisciplinary work with diverse institutions, universities, and companies (which will be described in chapter “Preliminary Projects”), cooperation instead of “single combat” was the strategy.

ADTL approaches inter-/transdisciplinary topics with interdisciplinary teams from different departments of universities, institutions, and companies. The aim of this lab is to facilitate innovative solutions for complex...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams B, Rademacher-Scheele T. Do you suffer from social media fomo? http://blog.jwt.de/do-you-suffer-from-social-media-fomo-infographic; 2012.

  • Archut A, Mauersberg T, Keranid T. App warnt vor Handy-Abhängigkeit. Retrieved 15 Jan, 2015, from http://www3.uni-bonn.de/Pressemitteilungen/009-2014; 2014.

  • Barthes R. The grain of the voice: interviews 1962–1980 (trans: Coverdale L). Berkeley: University of California Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bast G. Maths goes design. Kunst/Wien: Universität für angewandte, In-house publishers Angewandte; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer CA, editor. User generated content – Urheberrechtliche Zulässigkeit nutzergenerierter Medieninhalte. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin RM. The management of teams: why they succeed or fail. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science & Technology; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belbin RM. Team roles. http://www.belbin.com/rte.asp?id=396. 2012.

  • Bohemia E, Harman K, Lauche K. The global studio. Linking research, teaching and learning, Research in design series, vol. 5. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boradkar P. Designing things. A critical introduction to the culture of objects. Oxford/New York: Berg Publishers; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgdorff H. The conflict of the faculties. Perspectives on artistic research and academia. Leiden: University Press; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P. In: Kreckel R, editor. Ökonomisches Kapital – Kulturelles Kapital – Soziales Kapital. Göttingen: Soziale Ungleichheiten; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P. Sozialer Sinn, Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs J, Peat FD. Die Entdeckung des Chaos. Eine Reise durch die Chaos-Theorie. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T. Design Thinking. Harv Bus Rev. 2008;86 (6):84–92, 141. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18605031. Accessed 30 Sept 2011.

  • Brown T. Change by design. How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: HarperCollins; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A. The disneyzation, of society. London/Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton B, Sheelagh C, Greenberg S, Marquardt N. Sketching user experiences. Waltham: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG. The strategic management of technological learning. Learning to learn and learning to learn-how-to-learn as drivers of strategic choice and firm performance in global, technology-driven markets. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG. Measuring intangibles: managing intangibles for tangible outcomes in research and innovation. Int J Nucl Know Manag. 2004;1(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. “Mode 3” and “quadruple helix”: toward a 21st-century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol Manag. 2009;46(3/4):201–34. http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=27%26year=2009%26vol=46%26issue=3/4. Accessed 25 July 2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Mode 3 knowledge: production in quadruple helix innovation systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. New York: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. On certain formal properties of grammars. Inf Control. 1959;2:137–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A. Design anthropology. Object culture in the 21st century, edition Angewandte, New York: Springer; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins H. Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RR. Global climate and infectious disease: the cholera paradigm. Science. 1996;274(5295):2025–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5295.2025. Accessed 7 Nov 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall R. Design thinking summer session. Resource document Stanford d.school k12 LAB. 2013. http://dschool.stanford.edu/use-our-methods/. Accessed 25 Jan 2013.

  • Cross N. Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross N. Design thinking. Oxford/New York: Berg Publishers; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cross N, Christiaans H, Dorst K. Analysing design activity. Chichester: Wiley; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • d.school. Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford. http://dschool.stanford.edu/. " \h at Stanford. Chichester:

  • Dalrymple J, Miller W. Interdisciplinarity: a key for real-world learning. Planet No. 17, GEES Subject Centre, University of Plymouth, Plymouth; 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S. Creativity in invention and design. Cambridge: University Press, Denkschule; 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Bono E. De Bonos neue Denkschule. Heidelberg: mvgVerlag; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze G, Guattari F. A thousand plateaus. London/New York: Continuum International; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWachter M. Interdisciplinary team work. J Med Ethics. 1976;2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2495117/. Accessed 11 Sept 2011

  • Dewey J. Democracy and education. A Penn State electronic classics series publication (2001) (electronic). Hazleton: Pennsylvania State University; 1916. http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/johndewey/dem%26ed.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J. Reconstruction in philosophy. New York: Holt; 1920.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dilts R. Strategies of a genius, vol. 1. Capitola: Meta Publications; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doblin K, Stamos M. A Short Grandiose Theory of Design. In: Analysis and Intuition. STA Design Journal; 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Douven I. “Abduction”, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Spring 2011 ed., Zalta EN, editor. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/abduction/. Accessed 29 Apr 2011.

  • Draper P. On critical listening, musicianship and the art of record production. J Art Rec Prod. 2016:1–12, 6/02/2014. http://arpjournal.com/2630/on-critical-listening-musicianship-and-the-art-of-record-production/.

  • Dursun P. Architectural theory and spatial analysis. An analytical tool for thinking and talking about space. Proceedings: eighth international space syntax symposium, Santiago, PUC, Chile. 2012. http://www.sss8.cl/proceedings/. Accessed 13 May 2011.

  • Edison T. http://www.nps.gov/edis/index.htm. Accessed 28 Apr 2012.

  • Ellin N. Postmodern urbanism. New York: Princeton Architectural Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am Psychol. 1994;49:709–724. Ed. Norman B. Anderson. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairs, M. et al., editors. Final issues of FOMO released as project prepares to visit Venice. http://www.dezeen.com/2014/04/16/fomo-publishing-algorithm-final-issues-milan-2014-visit-venice-architecture-biennale/. 2014.

  • Frayling C. Research in art and design. In: Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1/1; 1993/1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman K. Creating design knowledge: from research into practice. In: Norman EWL, Roberts PH, editors. Design and technology educational research and development: the emerging international research agenda. Loughborough: Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman K. Research into, by and for design. J Visual Arts Pract. 2008;7(2). © 2008 Intellect Ltd Article. English Language. https://doi.org/10.1386/jvap.7.2.153/1.

  • Frisby D. Why we should fear a cashless world. http://www.theguardian.com/money/commentisfree/2016/mar/21/fear-cashless-world-contactless; 2016.

  • Frisch NS. Hooked on peers’ drawings: learning through the visual wildfire. In: Beate Reitan J, Lloyd P, Bohemia E, Merete Nielsen L, Digranes I, Lutnæs E, editors. Design learning for tomorrow – design education from kindergarten to PhD. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference for design education researchers, vol. 1. Oslo: ABmedia; 2013. p. 1983–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M. The production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert M. Crime versus Civil Liberties http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-02-24/war-on-cash-crime-versus-civil-liberties 24.02.2016.

  • Goel V. Sketches of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Göker MH. The effects of experience during design problem solving. Design Stud. 1997;18(4) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00009-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman S, Carroll MP, Kabayadondo Z, Carvagnaro LB, Royality AW, Roth B, Kwek SH, Kim J. Assessing d.learning: captureing the journey of becoming a design thinker. In: Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L, editors. Design thinking research. Measuring performance in context. Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt G. The dialectics of sketching. Creat Res J. 1991;1(2):123–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild P. Deleuze and Guattari: an introduction to the politics of desire. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon WJJ. Synectics. New York: Harper & Row; 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graffitti P. 1968. http://www.gerard-aime.com/phototheque/picture.php?/10617/category/2194. Accessed 11 May 2011.

  • Greenbaum J, Kyng M, editors. Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen U. Gift auf unserer Haut. Leder und Pelze für Deutschland. Retrieved 20 Jan, 2015 from http://www.zdf.de/37-grad/gift-auf-unserer-haut-leder-pelze-und-schuhe-fuer-deutschland-tierquaelerei-kinderarbeit-chemikalische-belastung-karrmann-29878404.html, 2015

  • Hayes JR. Cognitive psychology: thinking and creating. Homewood/Belmont: Dorsey Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M. Being and time (trans. J. Stambaugh). Albany: State University of New York Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich C, Patell J. In: Terra Mater, Ausgabe 2 Februar & März 2014. Höchberg: Vogeldruck und Medienservice GmbH & CoKG; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich C, Hürter T, Schramm S, Wüstenhagen, C. Die Kunst der Entscheidung. http://www.zeit.de/zeit-wissen/2011/06/Entscheidungen; 2011.

  • Hlavacs H, Wölfle R, Peters K, Martinek, D, Kuczwara, J, Kayali, F, Reithofer A, Mateus-Berr R, Brunmair B, Lehner S, Lawitschka A. Usability and Fun of the INTERACCT Client, EAI International Conference on Games for WELL-being (GOWELL 2016), June 14–16 2016, Budapest, Hungary; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huey S, Proctor R. New shoes. Contemplorary footwear design. London: Laurence King Publishing; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huq A, Xu B, Chowdhury MAR, Islam MS, Montilla R, Colwell RR. A simple filtration method to remove plankton-associated Vibrio cholerae in raw water supplies in developing countries. AEM Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996:2509–12. PMCID: PMC168033

    Google Scholar 

  • Huq A, Yunus M, Sohel SS, Bhuiya A, Emch M, Luby S, Russek-Cohen E, Nair GB, Sacke RB, Colwell RR. Simple sari cloth filtration of water is sustainable and continues to protect villagers from cholera in Matlab, Bangladesh. mBio. 2010;1(1):e00034–10. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00034-10. http://mbio.asm.org/content/1/1/e00034-10.full. Accessed 1 May 2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huybrechts L. Participation is risky. Approaches to joint creative processes. London/Berlin: Valiz. Anagram Books; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson M, Lakoff G. Leben in Metaphern. Konstruktion und Gebrauch von Sprachbildern. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer Verlag; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones M. 2010. http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/pasta-and-vinegar/2010/02/19/matt-jones-on-mujicomp-and-mujicompfrastructures-at-technoark/. Accessed 26 July 2012.

  • Kandel E. In search of memory. New York: Norton Currency Book; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Stuttgart: Reclam; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayali F. 2012, Poster presentation: “interacct – integrating entertainment and reaction assessment into child cancer therapy” poster presented to the games for health Europe conference, October 28th & 29th 2013, Amsterdam; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayali F. Workshop participation: “A Participatory Game Design Approach for Children After Cancer Treatment”, ACE 2014 workshop Designing Systems for Health and Entertainment: what are we missing? Funchal, November 11th 2014a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayali F. 2014, poster presentation: “using explorative design to develop health game concepts”, games for health Europe 2014, Utrecht, October 27th–28th 2014b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayali F. Participatory game design for the INTERACCT serious game for health. 1st joint international conference on serious games (JCSG 2015), Huddersfield. June 3–4; 2015.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kayali F, Silbernagl M, Peters K, Mateus-Berr R, Reithofer A, Martinek D, Lawitschka A, Hlavacs H. Design considerations for a serious game for children after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, in special issue on fun and engaging computing Technologies for Health, entertainment computing 15 (2016): Elsevier; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley T, Littmann J. The art of innovation: lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm. New York: Currency Book; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell R, Stables K, Zeidler D. Researching design learning issues and findings from two decades of research and development, science and technology education library, vol. 34. New York: Springer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein JT. Interdisciplinarity: history, theory and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein JT. Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures. A model for strenghth and sustainability. San Francisco: Wiley Imprint; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen I, Zimmerman J, Binder T. Redstrus cultures. A model for strenghth and sustainability. San Francisco: Wiley Imprint; 2010. nce and technology ed

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorf K. The semantic turn. A new foundation for design. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen T. The physical context of creativity. Creat Innov Manag. 2004;14(2):89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00297.x. Accessed 3 Sept 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubie KS. The neurotic atortion of the creative process. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press; 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey K. Listening publics: the politics and experience of listening in the media age. New York: Wiley; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange ML. Art meets politics. Visionen und Realitive process. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press; 1958. 1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00297.x. Accessed 3 Sept und Gemeinschaftskunde an der TU Dresden. In: Buschkühle CP, (Hg.) Knd Gemeinschaftskunde an der TU Dresden. In: Buschkühle CP. (Hg.)University of Kan, Oberhausen; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurel B, editor. Design research, methods and perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson B. How designers think. The design process demystified. Amsterdam/Boston/Heidelberg/London/New York/Oxford/Paris/San Diego/San Francisco/Singapore/Sydney/Tokio: Elsevier. 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laysiepen U (Ulay), Mateus-Berr R. Earth water catalogue. 2011. http://www.earthwatercatalogue.net/#project/181. Accessed 1 Apr 2012.

  • Laysiepen U (Ulay), Earth water catalogue. http://www.earthwatercatalogue.net/#project/181. Accessed 1 May 2012.

  • Lieshout AV. Teamrollenprofil nach Selbsteinsch" \l "project/181″ \h dam/Boston/Heidelberg/London/New York/Oxford/Par.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lill F. Smartphone-Sucht wird in Südkorea zum Problem. 2013. Retrieved 15 Jan, 2015, from http://www.zeit.de/digital/mobil/2013-10/suedkorea-smartphone-internet-sucht

  • Lockwood T, editor. Design thinking. Integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value. New York: Allworth Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maciver F, O’Driscoll A. Consultancy designer involvement in new product development in mature product categories: who leads, the designer or the marketer? 2010. www.drs2010.umontreal.ca/data/PDF/077.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2012.

  • Maddalena G. Guessing or reasoning? A philosophical account of hypothesis. In: de Almeida UB, Rojo J, editors. Euresis, Association for the Promotion of the Scientific Endeavour, Vol. 1 Summer 2011. 2011. http://www.scribd.com/doc/98312138/The-Event-of-Discovery. Accessed 13. July 2012.

  • Mareis C. The nature of design. In: Mareis C, Joost G, Kimpel K, editors. entwerfen, wissen, produzieren. Designforschung im Anwendungskontext. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag; 2010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R. The design of business. Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin B, Hanington B. Universal methods of design. 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Beverly: Rockport; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateus-Berr R. Applied design thinking LAB Vienna. In: Schrittesser I, Malmberg I, Mateus-Berr R, Steger M, editors. Zauberformel Praxis. Zu den Ms,lichkeiten und Grenzen von Praxiserfahrungen in der LehrerInnenbildung. Wien: nap; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateus-Berr R, Grossmann W. Applied design thinking LAB Vienna: INTERACCT. Interdisciplinary Technology Education in the 21st Century 2012. In: Technology Education in the 21st Century. The PATT 26 Conference Stockholm Sweden; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateus-Berr R, Laysiepen U. Ulay, Earth water catalogue. 2011. http://www.earthwatercatalogue.net/#project/181. Accessed 1 Apr 2012.

  • Mateus-Berr R, Hlavacs H, Lawitschka A, Nebel M, Peters K, editors. Als die Welt zu tanzen begann: Eigenverlag Angewandte; 2015a. ISBN: 978-3-9503850-8-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateus-Berr R, Brunmair B, Hlavacs H, Kayali F, Kuczwara J, Lawitschka A, Lehner S, Martinek D, Nebel M, Peters K, Reithofer A, Wölfle R, Silbernagl M, Sprung M. Co-designing avatars for children with cancer. In: VandeZande R, Bohemia E, Digranes I, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference for design education researchers LearnXDesign, vol. 4. Published by Aalto University School of Arts, Design and Architecture; 2015b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateus-Berr R, Karlusch A, Sachsenhofer, W. The case for interdisciplinary art and design education. In: Mateus-Berr R, Götsch M, editors. Perspectives on art education. Edition Angewandte. Berlin/Boston: DE GRUYTER; 2015c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matt G. Get together. Kunst als teamwork. Wien/Bozen: Folio Verlag; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr P. Sie sind nur lustorientiert, alles dreht sich um sie selbst. Retrieved 19 Jan, 2015, from http://derstandard.at/1385172345186/Sie-sind-nur-lustorientiert-alles-dreht-sich-um-sie-selbst; 2014.

  • Mers A. Transferdiskurse zr Künstlerpositionen, Kreativindustrien, Kreativität, Innovation, Ästhetik und Diagrammatik. In: Tröndle M, editor. Kunstforschung als ästhetische Wissenschaft, Beiträge zur transdisziplinären Hybridisierung von Wissenschaft und Kunst. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WJT. Interdisciplinarity and visual culture. The Art Bulletin. 77(4). In: Winters T, Interdisciplinarity and Design Education. Conference Proceedings: copyright © 2009 Swinburne University of Technology and RMIT University. Conference Cumulus 38, Hemispheric Shifts across learning, teaching and research. Published in Melbourne, Australia by Swinburne University of Technology and RMIT University; 2009. http://www.swinburne.edu.au/lib/ir/onlineconferences/cumulus/welcome.htm. Accessed 10 Sept 2011

  • Mittelstraß J. Art and research: an introduction. In: Rittermann J, Bast G, Mittelstraß J, editors. Kunst und Forschung/Art and research. Wien: Springer; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan N, Saxton J. Asking better questions. Markham: Pembroke; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschik M. Materialillusion auf Wertpapieren. In: Der schöne Schein. Symbolik und Ästhetik von Banknoten, Sammelband zur Konferenz an der Universität Augsburg. 17./18./19.Oktober 2014: Gietl Verlag; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • N.N. The political war on cash. 2016. http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-political-war-on-cash-1455754850. Published on: Feb 17, 2016.

  • Nahapiet J. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Acad Manag. 1998;23(2):242–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. Scientific interfaces and technological applications. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. Interdisciplinary research: promoting collaboration between the life sciences and medicine and the physical sciences and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbury D. Research training in the creative arts and design. In: Biggs M, Karlsson H, editors. The Routledge companion to research in the arts. Routledge/London/New York: Taylor & Francis; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. Die Organisation des Wissens. Wie japanische Unternehmen eine brachliegende Ressource nutzbar machen. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus Verlag; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussmayr K, Schwarz J. Bildung bedeutet auch, klassische Musik zu hören. http://derstandard.at/1385170118087/Bildung-bedeutet-auch-klassische-Musik-zu-hoeren; 2013.

  • Ormerod TC. Planning and ill-defined problems. In: Morris R, Ward G, editors. The cognitive psychology of planning. London: Psychology Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn AF. Your creative power. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn AF. Applied imagination. Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanek V. F. Pumh imagination. Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1953. Chology Press; 2005. York: Campus Verlag; Wien: Springer; 1973/2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnes SJ. Can creativitybe increased? In: Parnea SJ, Harding HF, editors. A source book for creative thinking. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnes SJ, Noller RB, Biondi AM. Guide to creative action. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry. 2007. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/episteme-techne/. Accessed 15 July 2012.

  • Peirce CS. Collected papers. Vols. 1–8, Hartshorne C, Weiss P, Burks AW, editors. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press; 1935–1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peran M. Interview in: dérive (Pamela Bartar) Stadtplanungen in der Post-It City. Von Barcelona bis Valparaiso oder Wien. Dérive 38 Zeitschrift für Stadtforschung. Artikel aus der Ausgabe 33. 2008. http://www.derive.at/index.php?p_case=2%26id_cont=752%26issue_No=33. Accessed 16 July 2009.

  • Peters S. Der Vortrag als performance, transcript. Bielefeld: Verlag; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peters K. Poster presentation: “Interacct – Serious Game Scores as Health Status Indicator” Poster presented to the MIE2014, September 2014, Istanbul, Turkey; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters K. Paper presentation: “INTERACCT: Remote Data Entry System with Game-Elements for young Leukaemia Patients”. Healthcom 2015, October 2015, Boston, USA; 2015a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters K. Paper presentation: “Serious Game Scores as Health Condition Indicator for Cancer Patients” Paper presented to the MIE2015, June 2015, Madrid, Spain. 2015b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters K, Unterbrunner A, Martinek D, Hofmann A, Hlavacs H. Paper presentation: Feasibility of physiotherapy exercise capturing using a low-cost motion capture system, 9th international conference on computer games and allied technologies (CGAT 2016), March 28–29 2016, Singapore; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty G. Evidence-based teaching. Gloucestershire: Nelson Thornes; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister I. FOMO – Ein weitverbreitetes Phänomen der Generation Y. Retrieved 15 Jan, 2015, from http://www.easygeneration.net/2014/03/13/fomo-ein-weitverbreitetes-ph%C3%A4nomen-in-der-generation-y. 2014.

  • Pickshaus A. Hilfe, ich habe FOMO. 2013. Retrieved 15 Jan, 2015, http://www.bild.de/ratgeber/2013/internet/hilfe-ich-habe-fomo-33936494.bild.html; 2013.

  • Plattner H, Meinel C, Weinberg U. Design thinking. Innovationen lernen, Ideenwelten vard University Press, Cambridge, MA; 1935–1966. Ribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M. The logic of tacit inference. In: Grene M, editor. Knowing and being: essays by michael polanyi. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press; 1966. p. 140–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M. The tacit dimension. London/Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pörksen B. Das Tamagotchi-Gefühl. Die virtuellen Küken der 1990er-Jahre sind längst passé. Aber das Gefühl der ständigen Alarmiertheit, mit dem man sie verbindet, lebt mehr denn je. Über Informationsüberflutung und Informationssouveränität. Retrieved 18 Jan, 2015, from http://derstandard.at/2000004928450/DasTamagotchi-Gefuehl. 2014.

  • Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V. Future of competition: co-creating unique value with customers. Harvard Business Press Books. Pn.9535-SRN-ENG. 2004. http://cb.hbsp.harvard.edu/cb/search/cocreation%2520prahalad%2520ramaswamy?Ntk=HEMainSearch%26N=0; 2004.

  • Raymond M. The trend Forecaster’s handbook. London: Laurence King; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhea D. Bringing clarity to the “Fuzzy front end”. A predictable process for innovation. In: Laurel B, editor. Design research. Methods and perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot T. Essays on the creative imagination. London: Routledge; 1906.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riemann F. Grundformen der Angst. Eine tiefenpsychologische Studie. München/Basel: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittmann T. Es gibt keinen Unterschied zwischen real und virtuell. http://www.zeit.de/digital/games/2014-04/eve-online-petursson-ccp; 2014.

  • Ruwe D. “Interdisciplinary course design” the clearing house. J Educ Strateg Issues Ideas. 2001;74(3):117–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle G. The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schischka B. WhatsApp feiert 700 Millionen Nutzer. http://www.pcwelt.de/news/WhatsApp_feiert_700_Millionen_Nutzer-Rekord-9044442.html; 2015.

  • Schneider G. In: Klein JT, editor. Interdisciplinary campus cultures. A model for strength and sustainability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2010. p. xv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler D, Namioka A. Participatory design, principles and practices. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler D, Namioka A. Participatory design, principles and practices. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung: Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. 9th edition 1997, unaltered reprint from 1934. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot; 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennet R. Handwerk. Berlin: Berlin Verlag; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozaki J, Cavagnaro LB. d.school brainstorming rules. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v1/4W1h5L_0rFz8; 2009a.

  • Shinozaki J, Cavagnaro LB. d.school brainstorming rules. 2009b. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1h5L_0rFz8. Accessed 29 Apr 2012.

  • Simon HA. The sciences of the artificial. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1969/2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman CE. Creative mind. London/Cambridge: University Press; 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperri RE. Nobelprize. 1981. http://www.nobelprize.org/mediaplayer/index.php?id=1606. Accessed 18 Mar 2012.

  • Stallybrass P, White A. In: Classen C, editor. Bourgeois perception: the gaze and the contaminating touch in: the book of touch. Oxford/New York: Berg Publishers; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan PF. Wissen und Nicht-Wissen im Entwurf. In: Mareis C, Joost G, Kimpel K, editors. Entwerfen wissen produzieren. Designforschung im Anwenderkontext. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes DE. Pasteur’s quadrant. Basic science and technology innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan LH. The tall office building artistically considered. First published in Lippinicott’s Magazine 57. 1896. http://de.scribd.com/doc/104764188/Louis-Sullivan-The-Tall-Office-Building-Artistically-Considered. Accessed 26 Jan 2012.

  • Sullivan G. Art practice as research, inquiry in visual arts. Washington, DC/Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore: Sage; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taimina D. Crocheting adventures with hyperbolic planes. Boca Raton: Tyler & Francis; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance EP. Understanding creativity: where to start? In: Psychological inquiry, Bd. 4, Nr. 3. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1993., http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=1047-840X%281993%294%3A3%3C232%3AUCWTS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-O. Accessed 26 July 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veryzer W, Borja de Mozota B. The impact of user-orientated design on new product development. An examination of fundamental relationships. J Prod Innov Manag. 2005;22(2):128–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00110.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel EV. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wake L. NLP. Principles in practice. St. Albans: Ecedemy Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas G. The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace; 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingardt M. Fehler zeichnen uns aus. Transdisziplince; 1926.s; 2010.ess; 2005.cnd Produktivität des Fehlers in Schule und Arbeitswelt. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener N. Kybernetik. Regelung und Nachrichtenziplince; 1926.s; 2010.ess; 2005.cnd Produktivität des Fehlers in Sch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde O, An ideal husband. “mrs. cheveley. (To herself) How thoughtful of him! To expect the unexpected shows a thoroughly modern intellect”. 1895. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/885/885-h/885-h.htm. Accessed 29 Apr 2012.

  • World Health Organization 2011, 86, 325–340, 29 July 2011, 86th year / 29 juiLLET 2011, 86e annexpected shows a thoroughly mhttp://www.who.int/wer. Zugegriffen am 1.2.2012.

  • Zeinlinger T. Warum WhatsApp-Nachrichten immer sofort beantwortet werden. Retrieved 15 Jan, 2015, from http://derstandard.at/2000004796020/Warum-WhatsApp-Nachrichten-immer-sofort-beantwortet-werden; 2014.

Links

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Mateus-Berr .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mateus-Berr, R. (2019). Applied Design Thinking Lab and Creative Empowering of Interdisciplinary Teams. In: Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_437-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_437-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics