Creativity in Invention, Theories

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_397-2

Synonyms

Creativity and Invention

Creativity is a capacity or trait, inherited or acquired, implying a more or less unique ability to apprehend new ideas and insights (Taylor 1988). Departing from standard definitions of creativity, the concept lies at the heart of invention. In Western history, it has thus been viewed as problematic, even heretical. Since God created the world out of nothing, creatio ex nihilo, any attempts to similarly create inventions out of nothing was conceit (Tatarkiewicz 1980). In research into the sources of creativity, individual characteristics are occasionally combined with environmental influences. Likewise are particular situations of insight, described by their unexpectedness and sudden effortlessness, often combined with the stressing of preparations as in knowledge accumulation. The view that creativity is more the result of an enduring process has...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abernathy WJ, Clark KB. Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res Policy. 1985;14:3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amabile TM. Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. Calif Manag Rev. 1997;40(Fall):39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bijker WE. Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  4. Boserup E. The conditions of agricultural growth: the economics of agrarian change under population pressure. London: Allen & Unwin; 1965.Google Scholar
  5. Cavalli-Sforza LL. Genes, peoples, and languages. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  6. Cowan R, Jonard N. The dynamics of collective invention. J Econ Behav Organ. 2003;52:513–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Csíkszentmihályi M. Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins; 1996.Google Scholar
  8. Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manag J. 1991;34(September):555–90.Google Scholar
  9. David PA. Path-dependence: putting the past into the future of economics. Institute for the Mathematical Studies in the social sciences technical report 533. Stanford: Stanford University; 1988.Google Scholar
  10. David PA. Path dependence: a foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica. 2007;1:91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Bono E. Lateral thinking: creativity step by step. New York: Harper & Row; 1970.Google Scholar
  12. Elster J. Explaining technical change: A case study in the philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983.Google Scholar
  13. Findlay CS, Lumsden CJ. The creative mind: toward an evolutionary theory of discovery and innovation. J SocBiol Syst. 1988;11:3–55.Google Scholar
  14. Funke J. On the psychology of creativity. In: Meusburger P, Funke J, Wunder E, editors. Milieus of creativity an interdisciplinary approach to spatiality of creativity, knowledge and space, vol. 2. Heidelberg: Springer Science + Business Media; 2009. p. 11–23.Google Scholar
  15. Gilfillan SC. The sociology of invention. Chicago: Follett; 1935.Google Scholar
  16. Godin B. The linear model of innovation: the historical construct of an analytical framework. SciTechnol Hum Val. 2006;31:639–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godin B. National innovation system: the system approach in historical perspective. SciTechnol Hum Val. 2009;34:476–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hatfield HS. The inventor and his world. New York: Dutton; 1933.Google Scholar
  19. Hecht G. The radiance of France: nuclear power and national identity after World War II. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  20. Hughes TP. How did the heroic inventors do it? Am Herit Invent Technol. 1985;1(2):18–25.Google Scholar
  21. Hughes TP. The dynamics of technological change: salients, critical problems, and industrial revolutions. In: Dosi G, Gianetti R, Toninelli PA, editors. Technology and enterprise in a historical perspective. Oxford: Clarendon; 1992. p. 97–118.Google Scholar
  22. Jewkes J, Sawers D, Stillerman B. The sources of invention: a study of the causes and consequences of industrial innovation through the inventions of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan; 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lubart TI. Models of the creative process: past, present and future. Creat Res J. 2000–2001;13(3–4):295–308.Google Scholar
  24. McGee D. Making up mind: the early sociology of invention. Technol Cult. 1995;36(4):773–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson RR. Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. J Econ Lit. 1995;33(March):48–90.Google Scholar
  26. Romer PM. Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ. 1990;98(5):S71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenberg N. Science, invention and economic growth. Econ J. 1974;84(March):90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosenberg N. Marx as a student of technology. In: Rosenberg N, editor. Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 34–51.Google Scholar
  29. Schmookler J. Invention and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schumpeter J. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers; 1942.Google Scholar
  31. Tatarkiewicz W. A history of six ideas: an essay in aesthetics, Melbourne international philosophy series, vol. 5. The Hague: MartinusNijhoff; 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor CW. Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. In: Sternberg RJ, editor. The nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988. p. 99–121.Google Scholar
  33. Tidd J, Bessant J, Pavitt K. Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2001.Google Scholar
  34. Usher AP. A history of mechanical inventions. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1929.Google Scholar
  35. Utterback JM, Abernathy WJ. A dynamic model of product and process innovation. Omega. 1975;3:639–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departmant of Arts and Cultural SciencesLund UniversityLundSweden

Section editors and affiliations

  • Marta Peris-Ortiz
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Organización de EmpresasUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain