Skip to main content

Divergent Versus Convergent Thinking

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 153 Accesses

Synonyms

Creativity versus intelligence; Innovation versus critical thinking; Intuitive thinking versus logic thinking; Irrational versus rational thinking

Key Concepts and Definition of Terms

The concept of divergent and convergent thinking was created by J.P. Guilford to term different types of psychological operations while problem solving (Guilford 1967). Divergent thinking is defined as producing a diverse assortment of appropriate responses to an open-ended question or task in which the product is not completely determined by the information. So, divergent thinking concentrates on generating a large number of alternative responses including original, unexpected, or unusual ideas. Thus, divergent thinking is associated with creativity.

Convergent thinkinginvolves finding only the single correct answer, conventional to a well-defined problem. Many facts or ideas are examined while convergent thinking for their logical validity or in which a set of rules is followed. Convergent...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Arden R, Chavez RS, Grazioplene R, Jung RE. Neuroimaging creativity: a psychometric view. Behav Brain Res. 2010;214(2):143–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogen JE. Split-brain basics: relevance for the concept of one’s other mind. J Am Acad Psychoanal. 2000;28:341–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Tzourio N, Frak V, Raynaud L, et al. Cerebral activations during number multiplication and comparison: a PET study. Neuropsychologia. 1996;34:1097–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel V, Dolan RJ. Differential involvement of left prefrontal cortex in inductive and deductive reasoning. Cognition. 2004;93(3):B109–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonen-Yaacovi G, Cruz de Souza L, Levy R, Urbanski M, et al. Rostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: a meta analysis of functional imaging data. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin GP, Johnson-Laird PN. Reasoning about relations. Psychol Rev. 2005;112(2):468–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford JP. Creativity. Am Psychol. 1950;5:444–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford JP. The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH. Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. J Second Gift Educ. 2005;16:57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihov KM, Denzler M, Forster J. Hemispheric specialization and creative thinking: a meta-analytic review of lateralization of creativity. Brain Cogn. 2010;72:442–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore DW, Bhadelia RA, Billings RL, Fulwiler C, et al. Hemispheric connectivity and the visual-spatial divergent-thinking component of creativity. Brain Cogn. 2009;70:267–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perleth C, Sierwald W. Entwicklungs- und Leistungsanalysen zur Hochbegabung. In: Heller KA, editor. Hochbegabung im Kindes- und Jugendalter. 2nd ed. Gottingen: Hogrefe; 2001. p. 171–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razumnikova OM. Gender-dependent frequency-spatial organization of the brain cortex activity during convergent and divergent thinking: II. Analysis of the EEG coherence. Hum Physiol. 2005;31(3):275–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Yang W, Tong D, Sun J, et al. A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on divergent thinking using activation likelihood estimation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(7):2703–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga M. Razumnikova .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Razumnikova, O.M. (2017). Divergent Versus Convergent Thinking. In: Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_362-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_362-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics