Skip to main content

Synonyms

Balanced organizational learning; Exploration-exploitation balance; Innovation-Efficiency

The question how organizations survive and prosper within changing environments is a central topic in contemporary management theory and practice. In order to gain and sustain competitive advantage, organizations need to reconcile two seemingly incompatible learning capabilities simultaneously: exploration (i.e., building new competencies) and exploitation (i.e., using and refining existing ones) (March 1991). The tensions between exploration and exploitation emerge from their competition for scarce resources and their self-reinforcing nature (Gupta et al. 2006). Most firms tend to overemphasize exploitation because payoffs of exploitation are more predictable and closer in time. Although firms focusing solely on exploitation may reap the short-term benefits of exploitation, they suffer from the lack of new ideas in the long run (“competency trap”). Likewise, focusing on exploration to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benner MJ, Tushman ML. Exploration, exploitation, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Acad Manag Rev. 2003;28:238–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garaus C, Güttel WH, Konlechner S, Koprax I, Lackner H, Link K, Müller B. Bridging knowledge in ambidextrous HRM systems: empirical evidence from hidden champions. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2016;27(3):355–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad Manag J. 2004;47:209–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad Manag J. 2006;49:693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güttel WH, Konlechner S. Continuously hanging by a thread: dynamic capabilities in ambidextrous organizations. Schmalenbach Bus Rev. 2009;61:150–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güttel WH, Konlechner S, Müller B, Trede JK, Lehrer M. Facilitating ambidexterity in replicator organizations: artifacts in their role as routine-re-creators. Schmalenbach Bus Rev. 2012;64:187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güttel WH, Konlechner S, Trede JK. Standardized individuality versus individualized standardization: the role of the context in structurally ambidextrous organizations. Rev Manag Sci. 2015;9(2):261–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levie J, Lichtenstein BB. A terminal assessment of stages theory: introducing a dynamic states approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 2010;34:217–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal D, March J. The myopia of learning. Strateg Manag J. 1993;14:95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci. 1991;2:71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML. The ambidextrous organisation. Harv Bus Rev. 2004;82(4):74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML. Organizational ambidexterity in action: how managers explore and exploit. Calif Manag Rev. 2011;53(4):5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML. Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future. The Acad Manage Perspect. 2013;27(4):324–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raisch S, Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J Manag. 2008;34:375–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek Z, Heavey C, Veiga JF, Souder D. A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. J Manag Stud. 2009;46:864–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner N, Swart J, Maylor H. Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: a review and research agenda. Int J Manag Rev. 2013;15(3):317–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA. Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif Manag Rev. 1996;38:8–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Garaus .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Garaus, C., Güttel, W.H., Konlechner, S., Lackner, H., Müller, B. (2017). Ambidexterity. In: Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_253-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_253-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics