Academic Firm

  • David F. J. CampbellEmail author
  • Elias G. Carayannis
  • Wolfgang H. Güttel
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_252-2
  • 72 Downloads

Synonyms

The Conceptual Definition of the Academic Firm

The “academic firm” represents a type of firm (firm-based organization) that focuses on encouraging, supporting, and advancing knowledge production (research, research and experimental development, R&D) and knowledge application (innovation). The academic firm is also inclined to generate profit (revenues), but follows here more the logic of a “sustainability” in balance with knowledge production and the principles of knowledge production. The contrary concept to the academic firm would be the “commercial firm,” which is...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ. Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday; 1997.Google Scholar
  2. Bush V. Science: the endless frontier. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office; 1945. http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm#transmittal.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell DFJ. Wissenschaftliche “Parallelkarrieren” als Chance. Wenn Wissenschaft immer öfter zur Halbtagsbeschäftigung wird, könnte eine Lösung im “Cross-Employment” liegen. Guest Commentary for DIE PRESSE, 2 Feb 2011. http://diepresse.com/home/bildung/meinung/635781/Wissenschaftliche-Parallelkarrieren-als-Chance?direct=635777&_vl_backlink=/home/bildung/index.do&selChannel=500.
  4. Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG. Lineare und nicht-lineare knowledge production: innovative Herausforderungen für das Hochschulsystem. Z Hochschulentwicklung. 2012;7(2):64–72. http://www.zfhe.at/index.php/zfhe/article/view/448.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG. Epistemic governance in higher education. Quality enhancement of universities for development. Springer briefs in business. New York: Springer; 2013. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/organization/book/978-1-4614-4417-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG. The academic firm: a new design and redesign proposition for entrepreneurship in innovation-driven knowledge economy. J Innov Entrep. 2016a;5(12):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13731-016-0040-1.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG. Epistemic governance and epistemic innovation policy. Technol Innov Educ. 2016b;2(2):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s40660-016-0008-2.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell DFJ, Güttel WH. Knowledge production of firms: research networks and the “Scientification” of Business R&D. Int J Technol Manag. 2005;31(1/2): 152–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG, Rehman SS. Quadruple helix structures of quality of democracy in innovation systems: the USA, OECD countries, and EU member countries in global comparison. J Knowl Econ. 2015;6(3):467–93. doi: 10.1007/s13132-015-0246-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. “Mode 3” and “quadruple helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol Manag. 2009;46(3/4):201–34. http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=27&year=2009&vol=46&issue=3/4 and http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&rec_id=23374&prevQuery=&ps=10&m= or.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. SpringerBriefs in business. New York: Springer; 2012. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/book/978-1-4614-2061-3.Google Scholar
  12. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: arts, democracy, and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems. J Innov Entrep. 2014;3(12):1–23. doi: 10.1186/s13731-014-0012-2.Google Scholar
  13. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M. The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage; 1994.Google Scholar
  14. Hemlin S, Allwood CM, Martin BR. Creative knowledge environments. The influences on creativity in research and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2004.Google Scholar
  15. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Mode 2 revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva. 2003;41:179–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Re-thinking science: mode 2 in societal context. In: Carayannis EG, DFG C, editors. Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Westport: Praeger; 2006. p. 39–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • David F. J. Campbell
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elias G. Carayannis
    • 2
  • Wolfgang H. Güttel
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty for Interdisciplinary StudiesAlpen-Adria-University KlagenfurtViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of Information Systems & Technology Management, School of BusinessThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Human Resource and Change ManagementJohannes Kepler UniversityLinzAustria

Section editors and affiliations

  • David F. J. Campbell
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty for Interdisciplinary StudiesAlpen-Adria-University KlagenfurtViennaAustria