Introduction
The aim of this exploratory analysis is (1) to identify current discourses on knowledge production, innovation and learning, the models they assume, and the tendencies that they suggest; (2) to briefly survey the circulating concepts of learning; (3) to propose new interactive definitions where learning and innovation are being seen as intertwined processes; as well as (4) to finally conceptualize a learning organization with such an interactive understanding and approach. Innovation and learning are being described as forms of knowledge production and knowledge application, seen as mutually complementing and cross-linked processes, jointly leading to the creation of new knowledge.
Conceptual Definition of Processes of Learning and of Processes of Innovation
It has been stated that research (knowledge production) and innovation in the knowledge economy, knowledge society, and...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Baitenizov DT, Dubina IN, Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG, Azatbek TA. Freelance as a creative mode of self-employment in a new economy (a literature review). J Knowl Econ. Online first. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-018-0574-5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13132-018-0574-5?wt_mc=Internal.Event.1.SEM.ArticleAuthorOnlineFirst&utm_source=ArticleAuthorOnlineFirst&utm_medium=email&utm_content=AA_en_06082018&ArticleAuthorOnlineFirst_20181206#citeas
Bast G, Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ, editors. The future of education and labor. New York: Springer; 2019. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030260675
Bennett C, Howlett M. The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sci. 1992;25(3):275–94.
Biegelbauer P. Wie lernt die Politik? Lernen aus Erfahrung in Politik und Verwaltung. Wiesbaden: Springer; 2013.
Campbell DFJ. Cross-employment, 503–508. In: Carayannis EG, (Editor-in-Chief), Dubina IN, Seel N, Campbell DFJ, Uzunidis D, (Associate Editors). Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Springer; (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_254.
Campbell DFJ. Global quality of democracy as innovation enabler. Measuring democracy for success. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72529-1. https://www.palgrave.com/de/book/9783319725284
Campbell DFJ, Aichinger R. Epistemic Governance und Dialogische Hochschul-Governance: Das Zusammenspielen von Hochschulmanagement und Hochschulforschung. [Epistemic governance and dialogical governance of higher education institutions: the interaction of higher education management and of higher education research]. Z Hochschulrecht. 2018;17(2):61–9.
Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG. Epistemic governance in higher education. Quality enhancement of universities for development. SpringerBriefs in Business. New York: Springer; 2013. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/organization/book/978-1-4614-4417-6
Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG. The academic firm: a new design and redesign proposition for entrepreneurship in innovation-driven knowledge economy. J Innov Entrep. 2016a;5:12 (pp. 1–10). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-016-0040-1.
Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG. Epistemic governance and epistemic innovation policy. Technol Innov Educa. 2016b;2:2 (pp. 1–15). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40660-016-0008-2.
Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG, Rehman SS. Quadruple Helix structures of quality of democracy in innovation systems: the USA, OECD countries, and EU member countries in global comparison. J Knowl Econ. 2015;6(3):467–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0246-7.
Carayannis EG. The strategic management of technological learning. Learning to learn and learning to learn-how-to-learn as drivers of strategic choice and firm performance in global, technology-driven-markets. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2001.
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol Manag. 2009;46(3/4):201–34. ISSN Print 0267–5730 & ISSN Online 1741–5276. http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=27&year=2009&vol=46&issue=3/4; http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&rec_id=23374&prevQuery=&ps=10&m=or
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. Int J Soc Ecol Sustain Dev. 2010;1(1):41–69. http://www.igi-global.com/bookstore/titledetails.aspx?titleid=38876; http://www.igi-global.com/bookstore/article.aspx?titleid=41959
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: arts, democracy, and Innovation in Quadruple Helix innovation systems. J Innov Entrep. 2014;3:12. http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.com/content/pdf/s13731-014-0012-2.pdf; http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.com/content/3/1/12
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Art and artistic research in quadruple and quintuple helix innovation systems. In: Bast G, Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ, editors. Arts, research, innovation and society. New York: Springer; 2015. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319099088
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Les systèmes d’innovation de la quadruple et de la quintuple hélice. [Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems.] Innovations. 2017;54(3):173–95. https://www.cairn.info/revue-innovations-2017-3-p-173.htm
Carayannis EG, Barth TD, Campbell DFJ. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. J Innov Entrep. 2012;1(1):1–12. http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.com/content/pdf/2192-5372-1-2.pdf
Carayannis EG, Grigoroudisn E, Campbell DFJ, Meissner D, Stamati D. The ecosystem as Helix: an exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. R&D Manag. 2018a;48(1):148–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12300/full.
Carayannis EG, Grigoroudis E, Campbell DFJ, Meissner D, Stamati D. ‘Mode 3’ universities and academic firms: thinking beyond the box trans-disciplinarity and nonlinear innovation dynamics within coopetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems. Int J Technol Manag. 2018b;77(1/2/3):145–85. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJTM.2018.091714; https://www.inderscienceonline.com/toc/ijtm/77/1-3
Decker P, Campbell DFJ, Braunstein J. Interdisciplinarity as a source of relevance for political science. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft (ÖZP). [Austrian Journal of Political Science]. 2018;47(3):19–32. https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs/index.php/OEZP/article/view/2749/2204; https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/OEZP
Dubina IN, Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG, Chub AA, Grigoroudis E, Kozhevina OV. The balanced development of the spatial innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem based on principles of the systems compromise: a conceptual framework. J Knowl Econ. 2017;8(2):438–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0426-0.
Grin J, Loeber A. Theories of policy learning: agency, structure and change. In: Fischer F, Miller GJ, Sidney MS, editors. Handbook of public policy analysis: theory, politics, and methods. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007. p. 201–19.
Hall P. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. Comp Polit. 1993;25(3):275–96.
Hayes AM, Laurenceau J-P, Feldman G, Strauss JL, Cardaciotto L. Change is not always linear: the study of nonlinear and discontinuous patterns of change in psychotherapy. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27(6):715–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.008.
Leiber T. Theories of learning and teaching (TOLT) and their models. Mannheim: EVALAG; 2019.
May P. Policy learning and failure. J Public Policy. 1992;12(4):331–54.
Morgan K. The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Papers in planning research, Department of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff, University of Wales Cardiff. 1995.
Pantelić I. Areas of innovation in arts: innovation and where to look for it. In: Carayannis E, editor. Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Springer; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200087-1.
Pratt A. The emerging shape and form of innovation networks and institutions. In: Simme J, editors. Innovation networks and learning regions? Regional policy and development 18. London/Bristol: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2004. p. 120–32. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203643556-7.
Radaelli C. Measuring policy learning: regulatory impact assessment in Europe. J Eur Public Policy. 2009;16(8):1145–64.
Sanderson I. Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Adm. 2002;80(1):1–22.
Schumpeter JA. Theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers; 1983. p. 221.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Campbell, D.F.J., Pantelić, I. (2020). Processes of Learning and Processes of Innovation. In: Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200098-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200098-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences