Clusters, Networks, and Entrepreneurship

  • Marc-Hubert Depret
  • Abdelillah Hamdouch
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_199-2

Synonyms

District; Hub; Milieu; National system of innovation; Park; Regional innovation system

Innovation processes often depend upon the availability or constitution of a critical mass of knowledge, (multidisciplinary) competencies and (entrepreneurial, managerial, and human) resources that are complex, cumulative and, for the most, still embryonic or difficult to access. Considerable efforts must be also devoted for mobilizing and training of the manpower, acquisition of new knowledge and know-how, and informing employees about new technologies and services, as well as their market potential. Equally important here is the need for a close coordination among a great number of heterogeneous and geographically dispersed actors. The potential for innovation and the competitive positioning of actors “depend increasingly on their differentiated abilities to collaborate with a wide range of partners – those with key complementary competencies and significant specific resources, and/or...

Keywords

Innovation Process Innovation Actor Entrepreneurial Opportunity Regional Innovation System Entrepreneurship Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aharonson BS, Baum JAC, Plunket A. Inventive and uninventive clusters: the case of Canadian biotechnology. Res Policy. 2008;37:1108–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin A, Cohendet P. Geographies of knowledge formation in firms. Ind Innov. 2005;12:465–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin A, Thrift N. Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. Int J Urban Reg Res. 1992;16:571–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Appold S. Location patterns of US industrial research: mimetic isomorphism and the emergence of geographic charisma. Reg Stud. 2005;39:17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asheim BT. Temporary organisations and spatial embeddedness of learning and knowledge csreation. Geogr Ann. 2002;B84(2):111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch DB, Stephan P. Company-scientist locational linkages: the case of biotechnology. Am Econ Rev. 1996;86:641–52.Google Scholar
  7. Autant-Bernard C, Billand P, Frachisse D, Massard N. Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from European collaborations choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Pap Reg Sci. 2007;86:495–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baptista R, Swann P. Do firms in clusters innovate more? Res Policy. 1998;27:525–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bathelt H. Cluster relations in the media industry: exploring the ‘distanced neighbour’ paradox in Leipzig. Reg Stud. 2005;39:105–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bathelt H, Taylor M. Clusters, power and place: inequality and local growth in time-space. Geogr Ann. 2002;B84:93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr. 2004;28(1):31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baum JAC, Calabrese T, Silverman BS. Don’t go it alone: alliance networks composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strateg Manag J. 2000;21(3):267–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bell M, Albu M. Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. World Dev. 1999;27(9):1715–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernela B, Ferru M, Depret M-H. Relational dynamics of the clusters life cycle: new insights from a mixed-method analysis. Mimeo: University of Poitiers; 2016.Google Scholar
  15. Boschma RA. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud. 2005;39:61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boschma RA, Frenken K. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. J Econ Geogr. 2006;6:273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Breschi S, Lissoni F. Knowledge spillovers and innovation systems: a critical survey. Ind Corp Chang. 2001;10(4):975–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bresnahan T, Gambardella A, Saxenian A. ‘Old economy’ inputs for ‘new economy’ outcomes: cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys. Ind Corp Chang. 2004;10(4):835–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Camagni R. Global network and local milieu: towards a theory of economic space. In: Conti S, Malecki EJ, Oinas P, editors. The industrial enterprise and its environment. Aldershot: Avebury; 1995. p. 195–214.Google Scholar
  20. Caplin A, Leahy J. Miracle on sixth avenue: information externalities and search. Econ J. 1998;108:60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carrincazeaux C, Lung Y, Rallet A. Proximity and localisation of corporate R&D activities. Res Policy. 2001;30:777–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Casper S, Murray F. Careers and clusters: analyzing the career network dynamic of biotechnology clusters. J Eng Technol Manage. 2005;22:51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Castilla E, Hwang H, Granovetter E, Granovetter M. Social networks in Silicon Valley. In: Moon-Lee C, Miller WF, Cong Hancock M, Rowen HS, editors. The Silicon Valley edge. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2000. p. 218–47.Google Scholar
  24. Champenois C. La co-localisation d’entreprises innovantes comme non-choix: L’exemple de l’industrie allemande des biotechnologies. Géogr Econ Soc. 2008;10:61–86.Google Scholar
  25. Coe NM, Hess M, Yeung HWC, Dicken P, Henderson J. ‘Globalizing’ regional development: a global production networks perspective. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 2004;29:468–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coenen L, Moodyson J, Asheim BT. Nodes, networks and proximities: on the knowledge dynamics of the Medicon Valley biotech cluster. Eur Plan Stud. 2004;12:1003–18.Google Scholar
  27. Cooke P. Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation exploring ‘globalisation 2’: a new model of industry organisation. Res Policy. 2005;34:1128–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Depret M-H. Pôles de compétitivité et gestion (territoriale) des ressources humaines : Fondements, enjeux et perspectives pour les clusters à la française. In: Gallouj F, Stankiewicz F, editors. Le DRH innovateur : Management des ressources humaines et dynamiques d’innovation. Bruxelles: P.I.E. Peter Lang; 2014. p. 203–31.Google Scholar
  29. Depret M-H, Hamdouch A. Clusters, réseaux d’innovation et dynamiques de proximité dans les secteurs High-Tech: Une revue critique de la littérature récente. Rev Econ Ind. 2009;128:21–52.Google Scholar
  30. Depret M-H, Hamdouch A. Multiscalar clusters and networks as the foundations of innovation dynamics in the biopharmaceutical industry. Rég Dév. 2011;33:227–68.Google Scholar
  31. Depret M-H, Hamdouch A, Poncet C. Les échelles territoriales pertinentes d’intervention des politiques d’innovation. In: Boutillier S, Forest J, Gallaud D, Laperche L, Tanguy T, Temri L, editors. Principes d’économie de l’innovation. Bruxelles: P.I.E. Peter Lang; 2014.Google Scholar
  32. Dicken P, Malmberg A. Firms in territories: a relational perspective. Econ Geogr. 2001;77:345–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dicken P, Kelly PF, Olds K, Yeung HW-C. Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analyzing the global economy. Global Netw. 2001;1:89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ferru M, Liberat N, Guimond B, Depret M-H. Deconstructing the collective process of environmental innovation: a case study of Poitou-Charentes companies. J Innov Econ Manag. 2015;16:139–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Folta TB, Cooper AC, Baik Y-S. Geographic cluster size and firm performance. J Bus Venturing. 2006;21:217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Garretsen H, Martin R. Rethinking (new) economic geography models: taking geography and history more seriously. Spat Econ Anal. 2010;5:127–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gertler MS. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). J Econ Geogr. 2003;3(1):75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gertler MS, Levitte YM. Local nodes in global networks: the geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Ind Innov. 2005;12:487–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Glückler J. Economic geography and the evolution of networks. J Econ Geogr. 2007;7(5):619–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gordon IR, McCann P. Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Stud. 2000;37:513–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grabher G. Trading routes, bypasses and risky intersections: mapping the travels of ‘networks’ between economic sociology and economic geography. Prog Hum Geogr. 2006;30:163–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol. 1985;91(3):481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Grotz R, Braun B. Territorial or trans-national networking: spatial aspects of technology-oriented co-operation within the German mechanical engineering industry. Reg Stud. 1997;31(6):545–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hamdouch A. Start-up biotechnologiques et dynamique des clusters et réseaux d’innovation dans la biopharmacie: Une revue de la littérature empirique. Journal des Entreprises Familiales. 2008;1(3):8–43.Google Scholar
  45. Hamdouch A. Conceptualizing innovation clusters and networks. In: Laperche B, Sommers P, Uzunidis D, editors. Innovation clusters and networks. Brussels: Peter Lang; 2010.Google Scholar
  46. Hamdouch A, d’Ovidio M. Expected and unexpected creative cities. Is there an ‘Alchemy’ of territorial creative dynamics? ESDP Conference, Aveiro; 2009 June 21–22.Google Scholar
  47. Hamdouch A, Depret M-H. Surveying the literature on territorial innovation systems: a suggested interpretation framework. SSRN Working Papers Series, 2009. 22 p.Google Scholar
  48. Hamdouch A, Moulaert F. Knowledge infrastructure, innovation dynamics and knowledge creation/diffusion/accumulation processes: a comparative institutional perspective. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res. 2006;19:25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hamdouch A, Depret M-H, Tanguy C, editors. Mondialisation et résilience des territoires: Trajectoires, dynamiques d’acteurs et expériences locales. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2012.Google Scholar
  50. Hamdouch A, Depret M-H, Tanguy C. Globalisation, innovation et échelles géographiques des dynamiques de résilience territoriale: Eléments de problématisation et analyse empirique à partir de trois études de cas. In: Klein J-L, Roy M, editors. Pour une nouvelle mondialisation: Le défi d’innover. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2013. p. 211–33.Google Scholar
  51. Hussler C, Rondé P. Les réseaux d’innovation des chercheurs universitaires sont-ils géographiquement circonscrits? Rev Econ Ind. 2005;109:69–90.Google Scholar
  52. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R. Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ. 1993;108:577–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jong S. How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry. Ind Corp Chang. 2006;15:251–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kaiser R, Prange H. The reconfiguration of national innovation systems: the example of German biotechnology. Res Policy. 2004;33:95–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lagendijk A. Beyond the regional lifeworld against the global systemworld: towards a relational-scalar perspective on spatial-economic development. Geogr Ann. 2002;B84(2):77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Markusen A. Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts. Econ Geogr. 1996;72:293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moodysson J, Coenen L, Asheim BT. Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the Medicon Valley life science cluster. Environ Plan. 2008;A40:1040–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moulaert F, Mehmood A. Analysing regional development and policy: a structural-realist approach. Reg Stud. 2010;44:103–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moulaert F, Sekia F. Territorial innovation models: a critical survey. Reg Stud. 2003;37:289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nachum L, Keeble D. Neo-marshallian clusters and global networks: the linkages of media firms in central London. Long Range Plann. 2003;36:459–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Niosi J, Zhegu M. Aerospace clusters: local or global knowledge spillovers? Ind Innov. 2005;12(1):5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nooteboom B. Learning by interaction: absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. J Manag Gov. 2000;4(1–2):69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Oinas P. Activity-specificity in organizational learning: implications for analyzing the role of proximity. GeoJournal. 1999;49:363–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Orsenigo L. The (failed) development of a biotechnology cluster: the case of Lombardy. Small Bus Econ. 2001;17:77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Owen-Smith J, Powell WW. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Org Sci. 2004;15:5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Phlippen S, van der Knaap B. When clusters become networks. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, TI 2007-100/3. 2007.Google Scholar
  67. Porter ME. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harv Bus Rev. 1998;76:77–90.Google Scholar
  68. Powell WW, Koput KW, Bowie JI, Smith-Doerr L. The spatial clustering of science capital: accounting for biotech firm-venture capital relationships. Reg Stud. 2002;36:291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Prevezer M. Ingredients in the early development of the U.S. biotechnology industry. Small Bus Econ. 2001;17:17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Saxenian A, Li W. Bay-to-Bay strategic alliances: network linkages between Taiwan and U.S. venture capital industries. Int J Technol Manag. 2003;25:136–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stuart TE. Governing strategic alliances. In: Buskens V, Raun W, Snidjers C, editors. Research in the sociology of organizations. 20th ed. Greenwich: JAI Press; 2003. p. 189–208.Google Scholar
  72. Suarez-Villa S, Walrod W. Operational strategy, R&D and intra-metropolitan clustering in a polycentric structure: the advanced electronics industries of Los Angeles. Urban Stud. 1997;34:1343–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ter Wal ALJ, Boschma RA. Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues. Ann Reg Sci. 2009;43:739–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Torre A. Clusters et systèmes locaux d’innovation: Retour critique sur les hypothèses naturalistes de transmission des connaissances à l’aide des catégories de l’économie de la proximité. Rég Dév. 2006;24:15–44.Google Scholar
  75. Trippl M, Tödtling F. Developing biotechnology clusters in non-high technology regions: The case of Austria. Ind Innov. 2007;14:47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm network: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm Sci Q. 1997;42:35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Waxell A, Malmberg A. What is global and what is local in knowledge-generating Interaction? The case of the biotech cluster in Uppsala, Sweden. Entrep Reg Dev. 2007;19:137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wever E, Stam E. Clusters of high technology SMEs: the Dutch case. Reg Stud. 1999;33(4):391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wolfe D, Gertler MS. Clusters from the inside and out: local dynamics and global linkages. Urban Stud. 2004;41:1071–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zucker LG, Darby MR. Virtuous circles in science and commerce. Pap Reg Sci. 2007;86:445–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Poitiers, CRIEF, IRIAFPoitiers (campus of Niort)France
  2. 2.University of ToursToursFrance