Skip to main content

Usability Testing

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine

Synonyms

Usability Evaluation

Definition

Usability testing is a systematic evaluation of a product with the ultimate goal of improving the product’s design.

Description

Usability evaluation can be conducted by experts, without or with potential end users; this entry focuses on the latter. Through systematic observation of a planned task or scenario carried out by an actual or potential user, usability testing is a method of evaluation that involves testing users’ interactions with a product and system to improve design (Usability.gov). This process is intended to ensure that a technology is intuitive and easy to use, with the importance ranging from lifesaving (e.g., in use of hospital equipment) to convenience (e.g., saving time on a task; (Tullis and Albert 2008). This process also provides actionable answers to questions that are critical for organizations, researchers, clinicians, etc., which are developing or using products. Usability standards have been developed and validated...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References and Further Reading

  • Bevan, N. (2009) “Usability.” Encyclopedia of database systems (pp. 3247–3251). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, T. M., & Eysenbach, G. (2010). Stages of use: Consideration, initiation, utilization, and outcomes of an internet-mediated intervention. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10(73). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-10-73.

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. R. (1994). Sample sizes for usability studies: Additional considerations. Human Factors, 36(2), 368–378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. X., Choong, Y. Y., & Salvendy, G. (1997). A proposed index of usability: A method for comparing the relative usability of different software systems. Behaviour and Information Technology, 16(4/5), 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. STC Usability SIG Newsletter, 8(2), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K. (1993). A mathematical-model of the finding of usability problems. Human Factors in Computing Systems, 206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M., Yuen, E. K., Goetter, E. M., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Acierno, R., & Ruggiero, K. J. (2014). mHealth: A mechanism to deliver more accessible, more effective mental health care. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 21(5), 427–436. doi:10.1002/cpp.1855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. (2006). Bias in usability testing. Paper presented at the Boston Mini-UPA Conference, Natick, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, B. (2015). Industry usability reporting. Retrieved from https://www.nist.gov/itl/iad/industry-usability-reporting.

  • Tullis, T., & Albert, B. (2008). Measuring the user experience: Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usability.gov. Usability testing. Methods.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colleen Stiles-Shields .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Stiles-Shields, C., Montague, E. (2017). Usability Testing. In: Gellman, M., Turner, J. (eds) Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6439-6_101955-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6439-6_101955-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6439-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6439-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics