Molecular Life Sciences

Living Edition
| Editors: Robert D. Wells, Judith S. Bond, Judith Klinman, Bettie Sue Siler Masters, Ellis Bell

DnaX Complex Composition and Assembly Within Cells

Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6436-5_123-2

Synopsis

DnaX is the ATPase that drives assembly of β2 onto DNA in concert with the δ, δ’, χ, and ψ subunits of the DnaX complex. The dnaX gene in E. coli expresses two proteins τ and γ by a programmed translational frameshifting mechanism. Although proposals have been made that the γ subunit might have functions distinct from the replicase, the abundance of evidence points to a DnaXcx that contains two copies of τ and one of γ. τ performs special roles that γ cannot, because it lacks domains that interact with the DnaB helicase and Pol III α. τ is essential for dimerizing the replicase, holding the leading and lagging strand together and tethering the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme to the DnaB helicase, serving as the central organizer of the replisome. It is also essential to allow rapid chaperoning of Pol III onto β2after its assembly onto DNA. This raises questions regarding the role of γ. A proposal has been made that its function is to avoid a third polymerase in the replisome...

Keywords

Lysine 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Becherel OJ, Fuchs RPP, Wagner J (2002) Pivotal role of the β-clamp in translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in E. coli cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 1:703–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blinkova A, Hervas C, Stukenberg PT, Onrust R, O’Donnell ME, Walker JR (1993) The Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme contains both products of the dnaX Gene, τ and γ, but only τ is essential. J Bacteriol 175:6018–6027PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blinkowa AL, Walker JR (1990) Programmed ribosomal frameshifting generates the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III γ subunit from within the τ subunit reading frame. Nucleic Acids Res 18:1725–1729PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnouf DY, Olieric V, Wagner J, Fujii S, Reinbolt J, Fuchs RP, Dumas P (2004) Structural and biochemical analysis of sliding clamp/ligand interactions suggest a competition between replicative and translesion DNA polymerases. J Mol Biol 335:1187–1197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cull MG, McHenry CS (1995) Purification of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. Methods Enzymol 262:22–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dallmann HG, McHenry CS (1995) DnaX complex of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: physical characterization of the DnaX subunits and complexes. J Biol Chem 270:29563–29569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dohrmann PR, McHenry CS (2005) A bipartite polymerase-processivity factor interaction: only the internal β binding site of the α subunit is required for processive replication by the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. J Mol Biol 350:228–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Downey CD, McHenry CS (2010) Chaperoning of a replicative polymerase onto a newly-assembled DNA-bound sliding clamp by the clamp loader. Mol Cell 37:481–491PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Flower AM, McHenry CS (1990) The γ subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme of Escherichia coli is produced by ribosomal frameshifting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:3713–3717PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Foster PL (2005) Stress responses and genetic variation in bacteria. Mutat Res 569:3–11PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao D, McHenry CS (2001a) τ binds and organizes Escherichia coli replication proteins through distinct domains. Domain III, shared by γ and τ, binds δδ’ and χψ. J Biol Chem 276:4447–4453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gao D, McHenry CS (2001b) τ binds and organizes Escherichia coli replication proteins through distinct domains. domain IV, located within the unique C terminus of τ, binds the replication fork helicase, DnaB. J Biol Chem 276:4441–4446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao D, McHenry C (2001c) τ Binds and Organizes E. coli Replication Proteins through Distinct Domains: Partial Proteolysis of Terminally Tagged τ to Determine Candidate Domains and to Assign Domain V as the α Binding Domain. J Biol Chem 276:4433–4440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Glover BP, McHenry CS (1998) The χψ subunits of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme bind to single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) and facilitate replication of a SSB-coated template. J Biol Chem 273:23476–23484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Glover BP, McHenry CS (2000) The DnaX-binding subunits δ’ and ψ are bound to γ and not τ in the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. J Biol Chem 275:3017–3020CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hersh MN, Ponder RG, Hastings PJ, Rosenberg SM (2004) Adaptive mutation and amplification in Escherichia coli: two pathways of genome adaptation under stress. Res Microbiol 155:352–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jarosz DF, Beuning PJ, Cohen SE, Walker GC (2007) Y-family DNA polymerases in Escherichia coli. Trends Microbiol 15:70–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeruzalmi D, O’Donnell ME, Kuriyan J (2001) Crystal structure of the processivity clamp loader gamma complex of E. coli DNA polymerase III. Cell 106:429–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim DR, McHenry CS (1996a) Biotin tagging deletion analysis of domain limits involved in protein-macromolecular interactions: mapping the τ binding domain of the DNA polymerase III α subunit. J Biol Chem 271:20690–20698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim DR, McHenry CS (1996b) Identification of the β-binding domain of the α subunit of Escherichia coli polymerase III holoenzyme. J Biol Chem 271:20699–20704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim S, Dallmann HG, McHenry CS, Marians KJ (1996a) Coupling of a replicative polymerase and helicase: a τ-DnaB interaction mediates rapid replication fork movement. Cell 84:643–650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim S, Dallmann HG, McHenry CS, Marians KJ (1996b) τ protects β in the leading-strand polymerase complex at the replication fork. J Biol Chem 271:4315–4318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Larsen B, Wills NM, Nelson C, Atkins JF, Gesteland RF (2000) Nonlinearity in genetic decoding: homologous DNA replicase genes use alternatives of transcriptional slippage or translational frame shifting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:1683–1688PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. McHenry CS (1982) Purification and characterization of DNA polymerase III’: identification of τ as a subunit of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. J Biol Chem 257:2657–2663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McHenry CS (2011) DNA replicases from a bacterial perspective. Annu Rev Biochem 80:403–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McHenry CS, Kornberg A (1977) DNA polymerase III holoenzyme of Escherichia coli purification and resolution into subunits. J Biol Chem 252:6478–6484 (and erratum 253:645)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. McHenry CS, Oberfelder R, Johanson K, Tomasiewicz H, Franden MA (1987) Structure and mechanism of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. In: Kelly TJ, McMacken R (eds) DNA replication and recombination. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 47–62Google Scholar
  28. McInerney P, Johnson A, Katz F, O’Donnell M (2007) Characterization of a triple DNA polymerase replisome. Mol Cell 27:527–538CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Modrich P (1989) Methyl-directed DNA mismatch correction. J Biol Chem 264:6597–6600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Olson MW, Dallmann HG, McHenry CS (1995) DnaX-complex of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: the χψ complex functions by increasing the affinity of τ and γ for δ−δ’ to a physiologically relevant range. J Biol Chem 270:29570–29577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Onrust R, Finkelstein J, Naktinis V, Turner J, Fang L, O’Donnell ME (1995) Assembly of a chromosomal replication machine: two DNA polymerases, a clamp loader, and sliding clamps in one holoenzyme particle. I. Organization of the clamp loader. J Biol Chem 270:13348–13357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pages V, Fuchs RPP (2002) How DNA lesions are turned into mutations within cells? Oncogene 21:8957–8966CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pritchard AE, McHenry CS (2001) Assembly of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: co-assembly of γ and τ is inhibited by DnaX complex accessory proteins but stimulated By DNA polymerase III core. J Biol Chem 276:35217–35222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pritchard AE, Dallmann HG, McHenry CS (1996) In vivo assembly of the τ-complex of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme expressed from a five-gene artificial operon: cleavage of the τ-complex to form a mixed γ−τ-complex by the OmpT protease. J Biol Chem 271:10291–10298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pritchard AE, Dallmann HG, Glover BP, McHenry CS (2000) A novel assembly mechanism for the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme DnaX complex: association of δδ’ with DnaX(4) forms DnaX(3)δδ’. EMBO J 19:6536–6545PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Reyes-Lamothe R, Sherratt DJ, Leake MC (2010) Stoichiometry and architecture of active DNA replication machinery in Escherichia coli. Science 328:498–501PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Simonetta KR, Kazmirski SL, Goedken ER, Cantor AJ, Kelch BA, McNally R, Seyedin SN, Makino DL, O’Donnell M, Kuriyan J (2009) The mechanism of ATP-dependent primer-template recognition by a clamp loader complex. Cell 137:659–671PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Song MS, McHenry CS (2001) Carboxyl-terminal domain III of the δ’ subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme binds DnaX and supports cooperative DnaX-complex assembly. J Biol Chem 276:48709–48715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Song MS, Dallmann HG, McHenry CS (2001a) Carboxyl-terminal domain III of the δ’ subunit of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme binds δ. J Biol Chem 276:40668–40679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Song MS, Pham PT, Olson M, Carter JR, Franden MA, Schaaper RM, McHenry CS (2001b) The δ and δ’ subunits of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme are essential for initiation complex formation and processive elongation. J Biol Chem 276:35165–35175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tippin B, Pham P, Goodman MF (2004) Error-prone replication for better or worse. Trends Microbiol 12:288–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsuchihashi Z, Kornberg A (1990) Translational frameshifting generates the γ subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:2516–2520PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Vass RH, Chien P (2013) Critical clamp loader processing by an essential AAA+ protease in Caulobacter crescentus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:18138–18143PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Yeiser B, Pepper ED, Goodman MF, Finkel SE (2002) SOS-induced DNA polymerases enhance long-term survival and evolutionary fitness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:8737–8741PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Yuan Q, McHenry CS (2009) Strand displacement by DNA polymerase III occurs through a τ-ψ-χ link to SSB coating the lagging strand template. J Biol Chem 284:31672–31679PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemistry and BiochemistryUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA