Definition
Differential reinforcement of low rates of responding (DRL) is a procedure in which the implementer can lower the rate of a response by reinforcing fewer incidents of that response or by reinforcing longer time intervals between incidents of the response. For example, if an individual makes profanity statements an average of 20 times per half hour, an interventionist could provide a positive reinforcer contingent upon that individual making these statements 18 or fewer times per half hour.
A related term is differential reinforcement of diminishing rates (DRD). The technical difference between DRL and DRD is that in DRD, reinforcement follows a response that has been preceded by a minimum amount of time since the last response. DRL technically refers to providing reinforcement for fewer and fewer responses exhibited by the individual. However, DRL is the most common term and often refers to both of these procedures.
Historical Background
The three general areas of concern...
References and Reading
Anglesea, M. M., Hoch, H., & Taylor, B. A. (2008). Reducing rapid eating in teenagers with autism: Use of a page prompt. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41(1), 107–111.
Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Deitz, S. M., & Repp, A. C. (1973). Decreasing classroom misbehavior through the use of DRL schedules of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 457–463.
Hagopian, L. P., & Kuhn, D. E. (2009). Targeting social skills deficits in an adolescent with pervasive developmental disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(4), 909–911.
Lennox, D. B., Miltenberger, R. G., Spengler, P., & Erfanian, N. (1988). Decelerative treatment practices with persons who have mental retardation: A review of five years of the literature. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 92, 492–501.
Mayer, G. R., Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Wallace, M. (2019). Behavior analysis for lasting change (4th ed.). Cornwall-on-Hudson: Sloan Publishing.
Rolider, A., & van Houten, R. (1990). The role of reinforcement in reducing inappropriate behavior: Some myths and misconceptions. In A. C. Repp & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 119–127). Sycamore: Sycamore.
Shaw, R., & Simms, T. (2009). Reducing attention-maintained behavior through the use of positive punishment, differential reinforcement of low rates, and response marking. Behavioral Interventions, 24, 249–263.
Wright, C. S., & Vollmer, T. R. (2002). Evaluation of a treatment package to reduce rapid eating. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(1), 89–93.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Zane, T., Davis, C. (2020). Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates of Responding (DRL). In: Volkmar, F. (eds) Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_1905-3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_1905-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6435-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6435-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences