Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders

Living Edition
| Editors: Fred R. Volkmar

Abolishing Operations

  • Amanda P. LaprimeEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_102290-1

Definition

Abolishing operations (AO): a general term to describe antecedent events which momentarily decrease the reinforcing or punishing effectiveness of a consequence and therefore alter the future frequency of behavior related to that consequence. AOs, in conjunction with establishing operations (EO; see establishing operation), fall under the greater omnibus term, motivating operation (MO; see motivating operations). AOs involve events which result in a decrease in the effectiveness of a reinforcer or punisher when delivered contingent on a behavior. There are many unconditioned abolishing operations identified in humans. Satiation of food, water, sleep, activity, oxygen, and warmth or cold all function as abolishing operations for related behavior and reinforcement (Cooper et al. 2007). For example, having just eaten lunch functions as an AO for food as a reinforcer which momentarily decreases any behavior reinforced by food.

Historical Background

Skinner (1938) discussed...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Reading

  1. Berg, W. K., Peck, S., Wacker, D. P., Harding, J., McComas, J., Richman, D., et al. (2000). The effects of presession exposure to attention on the results of assessments of attention as a reinforcer. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butler, L. R., & Luiselli, J. K. (2007). Escape-maintained problem behavior in a child with autism: Antecedent functional analysis and intervention evaluation of noncontingent escape and instructional fading. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carroll, R. A., Rapp, J. T., Rieck, T. M., & Siewer, B. N. (2011). The effects of noncontingent reinforcement with alternative oral stimulation in the treatment of rumination. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 17, 72–76.Google Scholar
  4. Chung, Y. C., & Cannella-Malone, H. I. (2010). The effects of presession manipulations on automatically maintained challenging behavior and task responding. Behavior Modification, 34, 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
  6. Derby, K. M., Fisher, W. W., & Piazza, C. C. (1996). The effects of contingent and noncontingent attention on self-injury and self-restraint. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ebanks, M. E., & Fisher, W. W. (2003). Altering the timing of academic prompts to treat destructive behavior maintained by escape. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 355–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edrisinha, C., O’Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G., & Choi, H. Y. (2011). Influence of motivating operations and discriminative stimuli on challenging behavior maintained by positive reinforcement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 836–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanley, G. P., Jin, C. S., Vanselow, N. R., & Hanratty, L. A. (2014). Producing meaningful improvements in problem behavior of children with autism via synthesized analyses and treatments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Horner, R. H., Day, H. M., Sprague, J. R., O’Brien, M., & Heathfield, L. T. (1991). Interspersed requests: A nonaversive procedure for reducing aggression and self-injury during instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iwata, B. A., Vollmer, T. R., Zarcone, J. R., & Rodgers, T. A. (1993). Treatment classification and selection based on behavioral function. In R. Van Houten & S. Axelrod (Eds.), Behavior analysis and treatment (pp. 101–125). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelly, A. N., Axe, J. B., Allen, R. F., & Maguire, R. W. (2015). Effects of presession pairing on the challenging behavior and academic responding of children with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 30(2), 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kern, L., & Clemens, N. H. (2007). Antecedent strategies to promote appropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 44(1), 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lang, R., O’Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M., & White, P. (2009). Enhancing the effectiveness of a play intervention by abolishing the reinforcing value of stereotypy: A pilot study. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 889–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lang, R., O’Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M., Giulio, E. L., et al. (2010). The effects of an abolishing operation intervention component on play skills, challenging behavior, and stereotypy. Behavior Modification, 34, 267–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laprime, A. P., & Dittrich, G. A. (2014). An evaluation of a treatment package consisting of discrimination training and differential reinforcement with response cost and a social story on vocal stereotypy for a preschooler with autism in a preschool classroom. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(3), 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and some terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mace, F. C., Hock, M. L., Lalli, J. S., West, B. J., Belfiore, P., Pinter, E., et al. (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marcus, B. A., & Vollmer, T. R. (1996). Combining noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement schedules as treatment for aberrant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(1), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McComas, J. J., Thompson, A., & Johnson, L. (2003). The effects of presession attention on problem behavior maintained by different reinforcer. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGinnis, M. A., Houchins-Juárez, N., McDaniel, J. L., & Kennedy, C. H. (2010). Abolishing and establishing operation analyses of social attention as positive reinforcement for problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(1), 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Michael, J. (2000). Implications and refinements of the establishing operation concept. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Reilly, M. F., Lang, R., Davis, T., Rispoli, M., Machalicek, W., Sigafoos, J., et al. (2009). A systematic examination of different parameters of presession exposure to tangible stimuli that maintain problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 773–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pace, G. M., Iwata, B. A., Cowdery, G. E., Andree, P. J., & McIntyre, T. (1993). Stimulus (instructional) fading during extinction of self-injurious escape behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rispoli, M., Camargo, S. H., Neely, L., Gerow, S., Lang, R., Goodwyn, F., et al. (2013). Pre-session satiation as a treatment for stereotypy during group activities. Behavior Modification, 38(3), 392–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roxburgh, C., & Carbone, V. J. (2012). The effects of varying teacher presentation rates on responding during discrete trial training for two children with autism. Behavior Modification, 37, 1–26.Google Scholar
  28. Simmons, J. N., Smith, R. G., & Kliethermes, L. (2003). A multiple-schedule evaluation of immediate and subsequent effects of fixed-time food presentation on automatically maintained mouthing. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 541–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. Acton: Copley.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, R. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1997). Antecedent influences on behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 343–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., & Ringdahl, J. E. (1995). Noncontingent escape as a treatment for self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Center for Children with Special NeedsGlastonburyUSA