Encyclopedia of Metagenomics

Living Edition
| Editors: Karen E. Nelson

Metagenomics, Metadata, and Meta-analysis

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6418-1_17-1



The analytical approach of identifying emergent patterns in ecological properties of microbial communities by sequencing community structure and function and defining the physical, chemical, and biological parameters of the ecosystem.

Metagenomics is the study of all genetic material from all organisms in a defined sample (Handelsman et al. 1998). However, it is defined: metagenomics is just a term used to describe a selection of tools and techniques that enable us to uncover the DNA from the organisms in an environment (which can comprise any ecosystem, from soil to human intestinal tract). Metadata (also known as contextual data) refers directly to information regarding the original sample, the extraction and handling of the DNA, and the sequencing platform and data processing information (Field et al. 2011; Yilmaz et al. 2011). Without such metadata, metagenomic...


Minimal Information Metagenomic Sequence Human Microbiome Project Metagenomic Dataset Genomic Standard Consortium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Caporaso JG, Field D, Paszkiewicz K, Knight R, Gilbert JA. Evidence for a persistent microbial community in the Western English Channel. ISME J. 2012;6:1089–1093.Google Scholar
  2. Delmont TO, et al. Metagenomic mining for microbiologists. Isme J. 2011;5(12):1837–43.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dinsdale EA, et al. Functional metagenomic profiling of nine biomes. Nature. 2008;452(7187):629–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Falkowski PG, Fenchel T, Delong EF. The microbial engines that drive Earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science. 2008;320(5879):1034–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Field D, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(5):541–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Field D, et al. The genomic standards consortium. PLoS Biol. 2011;9(6):e1001088.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gewin V. Genomics: discovery in the dirt. Nature. 2006;439(7075):384–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilbert JA. Beyond the infinite – tracking bacterial gene expression. Microbiol Today. 2010;37(2):82–5.Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert JA, Dupont CL. Microbial metagenomics: beyond the genome. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2011;3:347–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilbert JA, et al. Metagenomes and metatranscriptomes from the L4 long-term coastal monitoring station in the Western English Channel. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010a;3(2):183–93.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilbert JA, et al. The taxonomic and functional diversity of microbes at a temperate coastal site: a ‘multi-omic’ study of seasonal and diel temporal variation. PLoS One. 2010b;5(11):e15545.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Handelsman J, et al. Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: a new frontier for natural products. Chem Biol. 1998;5(10):R245–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hugenholtz P, Kyrpides NC. A changing of the guard. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11(3):551–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Knight R, et al. Designing better metagenomic surveys: the role of experimental design and metadata capture in making useful metagenomic datasets for ecology and biotechnology. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(6):513–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nelson OW, Harrison SH, Garrity GM. Meeting report for SIGS1: first conference of the standards in genomic sciences eJournal. Stand Genomic Sci. 2009;1(1):72–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rusch DB, et al. The sorcerer II global ocean sampling expedition: Northwest Atlantic through eastern tropical Pacific. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(3):e77.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tringe SG, et al. Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science. 2005;308(5721):554–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(12):6578–83.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Willner D, Thurber RV, Rohwer F. Metagenomic signatures of 86 microbial and viral metagenomes. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11(7):1752–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yilmaz P, et al. Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(5):415–20.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology & EvolutionUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA