Encyclopedia of Metagenomics

Living Edition
| Editors: Karen E. Nelson

Biological Treasure Metagenome

  • Geun-Joong Kim
  • Ho-Dong Lim
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6418-1_122-2



Given that the possibility and frequency of finding novel genes, enzymes, and metabolites through conventional pure culture technology are decreasing gradually, exploration of resources hidden in the metagenome as a treasure of new resources is expected to provide a new breakthrough. The metagenome is currently the most promising candidate for exploring new biological resources, and therefore there will be continuous efforts for refining strategies and developing new protocols. Through research using the metagenome, we can measure microbial diversity, understand ecosystems through a window into the microbial genome contents in a specific environmental habitat and explore useful resources, and then ultimately incorporate them into the process of practical uses.


The coming of a new era – the “metagenome age” – that accesses the genomes of all microbes retrieved directly from environmental samples...


Microbial Community Sequence Space Human Microbiome Project Microbial World Microbial Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. D’Costa VM, Griffiths E, et al. Expanding the soil antibiotic resistome: exploring environmental diversity. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007;10:481–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dymond JS, Richardson SM, et al. Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design. Nature. 2011;477:471–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Erguder TH, Boon N, et al. Environmental factors shaping the ecological niches of ammonia-oxidizing archaea. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009;33:855–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gibson DG, Benders GA, et al. Complete chemical synthesis, assembly, and cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium genome. Science. 2008;319:1215–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gill SR, Pop M, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science. 2006;312:1355–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Handelsman J. Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68:669–85.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hunter-Cevera JC. The value of microbial diversity. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1998;1:278–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kunin V, Copeland A, et al. A bioinformatician’s guide to metagenomics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72:557–78.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lartigue C, Glass JI, et al. Genome transplantation in bacteria: changing one species to another. Science. 2007;317:632–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lewis Jr CM, Obregon-Tito A, et al. The human microbiome project: lessons from human genomics. Trends Microbiol. 2012;20:1–4.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang K, Neumann H, et al. Evolved orthogonal ribosomes enhance the efficiency of synthetic genetic code expansion. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:770–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Xu J. Microbial ecology in the age of genomics and metagenomics: concepts, tools, and recent advances. Mol Ecol. 2006;15:1713–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesCollege of Natural Sciences, Chonnam National UniversityGwangjuRepublic of Korea