Encyclopedia of Metagenomics

Living Edition
| Editors: Karen E. Nelson

Bacterial Diversity in Tree Canopies of the Atlantic Forest

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6418-1_119-1



16S rRNA gene profiling is one of the main approaches used for the study of microbial communities that are associated with plants and animals, which are mostly comprised of species unable to grow under laboratory conditions. Even though plants harbor an enormous microbial diversity on their various surfaces, the functions of these microorganisms, except for a few that are pathogens or symbionts, are largely unknown, but are speculated to modify plant chemical signals, alter root exudation patterns, and provide protection against pathogens. Understanding of the factors that shape the structure of microbial communities, and the functions of microorganisms that are associated with plants, will likely be essential for establishing conservation strategies for protecting endangered plant species. The large reservoir of microbial diversity on plant surfaces also represents a largely untapped bank of microbial...


Microbial Community Bacterial Community Leaf Surface Microbial Diversity Bacterial Community Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Arey J, Crowley DE, Crowley M, Resketo M, Lester J. Hydrocarbon emissions from natural vegetation in California South-coast-air-basin. Atmos Environ. 1995;29:2977–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Delmotte N, Knief C, Chaffron S, et al. Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:16428–33.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ercolani GL. Distribution of epiphytic bacteria on olive leaves and the influence of leaf age and sampling time. Microb Ecol. 1991;21:35–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Finkel OM, Burch AY, Lindow SE, Post AF, Belkin S. Geographic allocation determines the population structure in phyllosphere microbial communities of a salt-excreting desert tree. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:7647–55.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Griffin DW, Kellogg CA, Garrison VH, Shinn EA. The global transport of dust – an intercontinental river of dust, microorganisms and toxic chemicals flows through the Earth’s atmosphere. Amer Sci. 2002;90:228–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lambais MR, Crowley DE, Cury JC, Büll RC, Rodrigues RR. Bacterial diversity in tree canopies of the Atlantic forest. Science. 2006;312:1917.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Legard DE, McQuilken MP, Whipps JM, Fenlon JS, Fermor TR, Thompson IP, Bailey MJ, Lynch JM. Studies of seasonal changes in the microbial populations on the phyllosphere of spring wheat as a prelude to the release of a genetically modified microorganism. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 1994;50:87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lindow SE, Brandl MT. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:1875–83.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Monier JM, Lindow SE. Frequency, size, and localization of bacterial aggregates on bean leaf surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:346–55.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morris CE, Kinkel LL. Fifty years of phylosphere microbiology: significant contributions to research in related fields. In: Lindow SE, Hecht-Poinar EI, Elliott V, editors. Phylosphere microbiology. St Paul: APS Press; 2002. p. 365–75.Google Scholar
  11. Morris CE, Monier JM, Jacques MA. A technique to quantify the population size and composition of the biofilm component in communities of bacteria in the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:4789–95.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Redford AJ, Bowers RM, Knight R, Linhart Y, Fierer N. The ecology of the phyllosphere: geographic and phylogenetic variability in the distribution of bacteria on tree leaves. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:2885–93.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ruinen J. Occurrence of Beijerinckia species in the phyllosphere. Nature. 1956;177:220–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tabarelli M, Pinto LP, Silva JMC, Costa CMR. Endangered species and conservation planning. In: Galindo-Leal C, Câmara IG, editors. The Atlantic forest of South America: biodiversity, status, threats and outlooks. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2003. p. 86–94.Google Scholar
  15. Thompson IP, Bailey MJ, Fenlon JS, Fermor TR, Lilley AK, Lynch JM, McCormack PJ, McQuilken MP, Purdy KJ. Quantitative and qualitative seasonal changes in the microbial community from the phyllosphere of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Plant Soil. 1993;150:177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vorholt JA. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:828–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang CH, Crowley DE, Borneman J, Keen NT. Microbial phyllosphere populations are more complex than previously realized. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:3889–94.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture (ESALQ)University of São Paulo (USP)PiracicabaBrazil
  2. 2.Enviromental SciencesUniversity of California, RiversideRiversideUSA