Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy pp 373–388Cite as

Best Practice for Evaluating the Astronomical Significance of Archaeological Sites

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

Most practitioners of archaeoastronomy would argue that paying due attention to social theory and the broader cultural context does not obviate the need for careful attention to be given to methodological considerations such as the fair selection of data. Notwithstanding the complexities and subtleties that can arise when archaeoastronomical evidence is duly considered in a broader context, this chapter addresses a number of basic issues of best practice, with data selection methodologies at the fore. It focuses particularly upon three types of evidence most commonly considered by archaeoastronomers – structural orientations, light-and-shadow effects, and symbol counts – as identified in Chap. 24, “Nature and Analysis of Material Evidence Relevant to Archaeoastronomy”. It does not address field survey and data analysis techniques as such; these are covered in Chaps. 26, “Techniques of Field Survey” and 27, “Analyzing Orientations”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkinson RJC (1966) Moonshine on stonehenge. Antiquity 40:212–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Aveni AF (1988) The Thom paradigm in the Americas: the case of the cross-circle designs. In: Ruggles CLN (ed) Records in stone: papers in memory of Alexander Thom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 442–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Aveni AF (ed) (2008) Foundations of new world cultural astronomy: a reader with commentary. University Press of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Aveni AF, Hartung H, Buckingham B (1978) The pecked cross symbol in ancient America. Science 202:267–279

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Boutsikas E, Ruggles CLN (2011) Temples, stars, and ritual landscapes: the potential for archaeoastronomy in ancient Greece. Am J Archaeol 115(1):55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley RJ (2009) An archaeology of natural places. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan M (1980) The Boyne Valley vision. Dolmen Press, Portlaoise

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson JB (1987) Romancing the stone, or moonshine on the sun dagger. In: Carlson JB, Judge WJ (eds) Astronomy and ceremony in the prehistoric Southwest. Papers of the Maxwell Museum of Anthropology, no. 2. Maxwell Museum of Anthropology, Albuquerque, pp 71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotte M, Ruggles CLN (2010) Astronomical heritage in the context of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention: developing a professional and rational approach. In: Ruggles CLN, Cotte M (eds) Heritage sites of astronomy and archaeoastronomy in the context of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention: a thematic study. ICOMOS–IAU, Paris, pp 261–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards ER, Belmonte JA (2004) Megalithic astronomy of Easter Island: a reassessment. J Hist Astron 35:421–433

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman PR (1982) The statistical approach. In: Heggie DC (ed) Archaeoastronomy in the old world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 45–52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hadingham E (1981) The lunar observatory hypothesis at Carnac: a reconsideration. Antiquity 45:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins GS, White JB (1965) Stonehenge decoded. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggie DC (1981) Megalithic science: ancient mathematics and astronomy in northwest Europe. Thames and Hudson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggie DC (1982) Megalithic astronomy: highlights and visions. In: Heggie DC (ed) Archaeoastronomy in the old world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskinson T (2005) Calendric investigations of a complex petroglyph panel at a Gila River archaeological site in Arizona. In: Fountain JW, Sinclair RM (eds) Current studies in archaeoastronomy: conversations across time and space. Carolina Academic Press, Durham, pp 169–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton R (1991) The pagan religions of the ancient British Isles. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintigh KW (1992) I wasn’t going to say anything, but since you asked: archaeoastronomy and archaeology. Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy News 5(1):1&4

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirch PV, Ruggles CLN (n.d.) Heiau sites of Kahikinui and Kaupō (manuscript in preparation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer JN (1909) Stonehenge and other British stone monuments astronomically considered, 2nd edn. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Malville JM (2011) Astronomy and ceremony at Chankillo: an Andean perspective. In: Ruggles CLN (ed) Archaeoastronomy and ethnoastronomy: building bridges between cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 154–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose FC (1893) On the results of an examination of the orientations of a number of Greek temples with a view to connect these angles with the amplitudes of certain stars at the time the temples were founded, and an endeavour to derive therefrom the dates of their foundation by consideration of the changes produced upon the right ascension and declination of the stars by the precession of the equinoxes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A184:805–834

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira QG (2011) La Horca del Inca – an astronomical observatory? In: Ruggles CLN (ed) Archaeoastronomy and ethnoastronomy: building bridges between cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 128–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie WMF (1883) The pyramids and temples of Gizeh. Field and Tuer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles CLN (1981) A critical examination of the megalithic lunar observatories. In: Ruggles CLN, Whittle AWR (eds) Astronomy and society in Britain during the period 4000–1500 BC, BAR British Series 88. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, pp 153–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles CLN (1982) A reassessment of the high precision megalithic lunar sightlines, 1: backsights, indicators and the archaeological status of the sightlines. Archaeoastronomy 4(Supplement to the Journal for the History for Astronomy 13):S21–S40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles CLN (1983) A reassessment of the high precision megalithic lunar sightlines, 2: foresights and the problem of selection. Archaeoastronomy 5(Supplement to the Journal for the History for Astronomy 14):S1–S36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles CLN (1999) Astronomy in prehistoric Britain and Ireland. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles CLN (2005) Ancient astronomy: an encyclopedia of cosmologies and myth. ABC–CLIO, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles CLN (2007) Cosmology, calendar, and temple orientations in ancient Hawai’i. In: Ruggles CLN, Urton G (eds) Skywatching in the ancient world: new perspectives in cultural astronomy. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, pp 287–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles CLN (2011) Pushing back the frontiers or still running around the same circles? ‘Interpretative archaeoastronomy’ thirty years on. In: Ruggles CLN (ed) Archaeoastronomy and ethnoastronomy: building bridges between cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles CLN, Saunders NJ (1993) The study of cultural astronomy. In: Ruggles CLN, Saunders NJ (eds) Astronomies and cultures. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, pp 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer BE (2006) Case studies of three of the most famous claimed archaeoastronomical alignments in North America. In: Bostwick TW, Bates B (eds) Viewing the sky through past and present cultures. Pueblo Grande Museum Anthropological Papers, No 15. City of Phoenix, Phoenix, pp 27–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofaer A, Zinser V, Sinclair RM (1979) A unique solar marking construct. Science 206:283–285

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sofaer A, Sinclair RM, Doggett LE (1982) Lunar markings on Fajada Butte, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. In: Aveni AF (ed) Archaeoastronomy in the new world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 169–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofaer A, Price A, Holmlund J, Nicoli J, Piscitello A (2011) The Sun Dagger interactive computer graphics model: a digital restoration of a Chacoan calendrical site. In: Walker WH, Venzor KR (eds) Contemporary archaeologies of the Southwest. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, pp 67–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper R (1982) Archaeo-astronomical Cushites: some comments. Azania 17:145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom A (1971) Megalithic lunar observatories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom A, Thom AS (1978) Megalithic remains in Britain and Brittany. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Towrie S (2013) Orkneyjar: the Crantit Cairn, St Ola. http://www.orkneyjar.com/history/tombs/crantit/crantit3.htm. Accessed 2 Apr 2013

  • Urton G (2001) A calendrical and demographic tomb text from northern Peru. Latin American Antiquity 12(2):127–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urton G, Brezine C (2009) Khipu database project. http://khipukamayuq.fas.harvard.edu/. Accessed 2 Apr 2013

  • Williamson T, Bellamy L (1983) Ley lines in question. World’s Work, Tadworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeilik M (1985a) The ethnoastronomy of the historic Pueblos, I: calendrical sun watching. Archaeoastronomy 8(Supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy, 16):S1–S24

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeilik M (1985b) A reassessment of the Fajada Butte solar marker. Archaeoastronomy 9(supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy, 16):S69–S85

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, UK

    Clive L. N. Ruggles

Authors
  1. Clive L. N. Ruggles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clive L. N. Ruggles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Archaeology & Ancient History, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

    Clive L.N. Ruggles

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ruggles, C.L.N. (2015). Best Practice for Evaluating the Astronomical Significance of Archaeological Sites. In: Ruggles, C. (eds) Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation