Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2014 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Asexuality

  • Matthew A. Rider
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_9241

In psychological and spiritual academic circles, there remains considerable disagreement over the term asexuality. Often the confusion involves whether one’s behavior or identity distinguishes asexuality. Most definitions of asexuality have two dimensions in common – the absence of sexual orientation (asexual by orientation) and/or a pronounced lack of sexual interest or behavior (asexual by behavior). The first dimension involves people who are asexual by behavior such as celibates and virgins. These asexual by behavior individuals may or may not have low sex drive. This fact is especially true with those who have chosen to live an asexual lifestyle as part of a spiritual journey reporting an otherwise normal libido. Likewise, virginity alone is not a prerequisite for asexuality since many individuals who are asexual by behavior have engaged in sex in the past but have no current interest in or plans to engage in additional sexual behavior. Chaste ordained clergy and vowed religious...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Bogaert, A. F. (2004). Asexuality: Prevalence and associated factors in a national probability sample. Journal of Sex Research, 41(3), 279–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogaert, A. F. (2006). Toward a conceptual understanding of asexuality. Review of General Psychology, 10(3), 241–250.Google Scholar
  3. Brotto, L., & Morag, Y. (2011). Physiology and subjective sexual arousal in self-identified asexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(4), 699–712.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brotto, L., Knudson, G., Inskip, J., Rhodes, K., & Erskine, Y. (2010). Asexuality: A mixed methods approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 599–618.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrigan, M. (2011). There’s more to life than sex? Difference and commonality within the asexual community. Sexualities, 14(4), 462–478.Google Scholar
  6. DeLuzio Chasin, C. J. (2011). Theoretical issues in the study of asexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(4), 713–723.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hinderliter, A. (2009). Methodological issues for studying asexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 619–621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Przybylo, E. (2011). Crisis and safety: The asexual in sexusociety. Sexualities, 14(4), 444–461.Google Scholar
  9. Scherrer, K. S. (2008). Coming to an asexual identity: Negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities, 11(5), 621–641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Storms, M. D. (1980). Theories of sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(5), 783–792.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Loyola University MarylandColumbiaUSA