Skip to main content

Archetypal Cultural Psychology

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion
  • 213 Accesses

The analysis of culture using Carl Jung’s archetypal theory, as distinct from clinical practice, is widespread. Following Freud, he directed thinking in the wholly new path of looking at the unconscious factors not only behind individual but also behind collective cultural phenomena, from religion to gender. He rejected Freud’s excessive emphasis on sexuality and his rejection of religion, that Freud called an illusory infantile father complex. As Jung developed his theory of the collective unconscious, he saw more archetypal themes in culture.

Jung saw that mythsare not just illusory fantasies to be disposed of by rational thinking, but are highly symbolic. As Freud had seen deeply into the Oedipus and Narcissus myths, Jung saw the deep meaningfulness of patients’ dreams and fantasies and flung open the doors to interpreting all myths. He looked into astrology; Greek myths such as Hermes the trickster; Roman myths such as Mars, God of war; feminine Sophia as gnostic wisdom; and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bailey, L. W. (2005). The enchantments of technology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolen, J. S. (1984). Goddesses in every woman. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, R. (1991). Jung and phenomenology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. New York: Bollingen Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourley, J. P. (1984). The illness that we are. Toronto: Inner City Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edinger, E. (1973). Ego and archetype. Baltimore: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliade, M. (1958). Patterns in comparative religion. New York: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. (1999). The hero with an African face. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. (1989). Archetypal process: Self and divine in Whitehead, Jung and Hillman. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, J. (2004). A terrible love of war. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopke, R. (2001). Jung, Jungians and homosexuality. Boston: Shambhala Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A. (1976). She: Understanding female psychology. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A. (1983). We: Understanding the psychology of romantic love. New York: HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A. (1989). He: Understanding masculine psychology. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1964a). Man and his symbols. New York: Dell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1964b). Memories, dreams, reflections. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1979). The collected works of Carl G. Jung (H. Read, et al. Eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. 20 Vols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, E., & von Franz, M.-L. (1960). The Grail legend. London: Hodder and Staughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeming, D. (1998). Mythology: The voyage of the hero. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1975). The new polytheism. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R., & Gillette, D. (1990). King warrior magician lover: Rediscovering the archetypes of the mature masculine. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, M. (1990). The heroine’s journey. Boston: Shambhala Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, E. (1955). The great mother: An analysis of the archetype. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. (1986). The hero within: Six archetypes we live by. San Francisco: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanyshn, R. (1989). Technology and symptom and dream. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, S. (2010). C.G. Jung in the humanities. New Orleans: Spring Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacey, D. (2001). Jung and the new age. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanov, A. (1971). The feminine in Jungian psychology and Christian theology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanov, A., & Ulanov, B. (1994). Transforming sexuality: The archetypal world of anima and animus. Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Franz, M.-L. (1970a). Interpretation of fairytales. Dallas: Spring Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Franz, M.-L. (1970b). An interpretation of Apuleius’ Golden Ass. Dallas: Spring Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Franz, M.-L. (1972). Creation myths. Zurich: Spring Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Franz, M.-L. (1980). Projection and re-collection in Jungian psychology. LaSalle: Open Court Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (2002). Jung and the Jungians on myth. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Eisendrath, P., & Dawson, T. (1997). The Cambridge companion to Jung. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lee W. Bailey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bailey, L.W. (2014). Archetypal Cultural Psychology. In: Leeming, D.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_9100

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_9100

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6085-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6086-2

  • eBook Packages: Behavioral Science

Publish with us

Policies and ethics