Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2014 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Archetypal Cultural Psychology

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_9100

The analysis of culture using Carl Jung’s archetypal theory, as distinct from clinical practice, is widespread. Following Freud, he directed thinking in the wholly new path of looking at the unconscious factors not only behind individual but also behind collective cultural phenomena, from religion to gender. He rejected Freud’s excessive emphasis on sexuality and his rejection of religion, that Freud called an illusory infantile father complex. As Jung developed his theory of the collective unconscious, he saw more archetypal themes in culture.

Jung saw that mythsare not just illusory fantasies to be disposed of by rational thinking, but are highly symbolic. As Freud had seen deeply into the Oedipus and Narcissus myths, Jung saw the deep meaningfulness of patients’ dreams and fantasies and flung open the doors to interpreting all myths. He looked into astrology; Greek myths such as Hermes the trickster; Roman myths such as Mars, God of war; feminine Sophia as gnostic wisdom; and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Bailey, L. W. (2005). The enchantments of technology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bolen, J. S. (1984). Goddesses in every woman. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  3. Brooke, R. (1991). Jung and phenomenology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, J. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. New York: Bollingen Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Dourley, J. P. (1984). The illness that we are. Toronto: Inner City Books.Google Scholar
  6. Edinger, E. (1973). Ego and archetype. Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
  7. Eliade, M. (1958). Patterns in comparative religion. New York: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
  8. Ford, C. (1999). The hero with an African face. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  9. Griffin, D. R. (1989). Archetypal process: Self and divine in Whitehead, Jung and Hillman. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hillman, J. (2004). A terrible love of war. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Hopke, R. (2001). Jung, Jungians and homosexuality. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, R. A. (1976). She: Understanding female psychology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, R. A. (1983). We: Understanding the psychology of romantic love. New York: HarperOne.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, R. A. (1989). He: Understanding masculine psychology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  15. Jung, C. G. (1964a). Man and his symbols. New York: Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Jung, C. G. (1964b). Memories, dreams, reflections. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  17. Jung, C. G. (1979). The collected works of Carl G. Jung (H. Read, et al. Eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. 20 Vols.Google Scholar
  18. Jung, E., & von Franz, M.-L. (1960). The Grail legend. London: Hodder and Staughton.Google Scholar
  19. Leeming, D. (1998). Mythology: The voyage of the hero. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, D. (1975). The new polytheism. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  21. Moore, R., & Gillette, D. (1990). King warrior magician lover: Rediscovering the archetypes of the mature masculine. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.Google Scholar
  22. Murdock, M. (1990). The heroine’s journey. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Neumann, E. (1955). The great mother: An analysis of the archetype. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  24. Pearson, C. (1986). The hero within: Six archetypes we live by. San Francisco: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  25. Romanyshn, R. (1989). Technology and symptom and dream. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Rowland, S. (2010). C.G. Jung in the humanities. New Orleans: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Tacey, D. (2001). Jung and the new age. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Ulanov, A. (1971). The feminine in Jungian psychology and Christian theology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ulanov, A., & Ulanov, B. (1994). Transforming sexuality: The archetypal world of anima and animus. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  30. von Franz, M.-L. (1970a). Interpretation of fairytales. Dallas: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
  31. von Franz, M.-L. (1970b). An interpretation of Apuleius’ Golden Ass. Dallas: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
  32. von Franz, M.-L. (1972). Creation myths. Zurich: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
  33. von Franz, M.-L. (1980). Projection and re-collection in Jungian psychology. LaSalle: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Walker, S. (2002). Jung and the Jungians on myth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Young-Eisendrath, P., & Dawson, T. (1997). The Cambridge companion to Jung. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and ReligionIthaca CollegeIthacaUSA