Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2014 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Antichrist

  • Bobbi Dykema Katsanis
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_36

Introduction

Antichrist, at the most basic level of understanding, is simply any opponent of Christ or, more commonly, the ultimate final opponent of Christ. This figure embodies all that is antithetical to Christ, Christ’s teachings, and Christ’s salvific action in the world as Christians understand these concepts. While based in a few rather obscure passages of Christian scripture, the concept of Antichrist and accompanying narratives and descriptions about Antichrist’s identifying characteristics, deeds, and context have developed in a long and rich tradition from the earliest days of Christianity.

Antichrist is mentioned as such only once each in two of the three epistles of John in the Christian New Testament. However, Christian theologians from very early on began associating Antichrist with the Beast described in the scenes of final judgment in the Apocalypse of John (also known as the Book of Revelation), as well as with apocalyptic imagery in the Hebrew Scriptures book of the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Adso. (1976). De ortu et tempore Antichristi: necnon et tractatus qui ab eo dependunt. Turnholt: Brepols.Google Scholar
  2. Alighieri, D. (1948). The divine comedy: Inferno, purgatorio, paradiso. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bettelheim, B. (1976). The uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairy tales. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, A. Y. (1979). The apocalypse. New Testament message (O. P. W. Harrington & C. P. D. Senior, Eds.) (Vol. 22). Wilmington: Michael Glazier.Google Scholar
  5. Dostoevsky, F. (1990). The brothers Karamazov (trans: Pevear, R. & Volokhonsky, L.). San Francisco: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  6. Emmerson, R. K. (1981). Antichrist in the Middle Ages: A study of medieval apocalypticism, art, and literature. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  7. Flanagan, S. (2000). Twelfth-century apocalyptic imaginations and the coming of the Antichrist. Journal of Religious History, 24(1), 57–69.Google Scholar
  8. Fuller, R. C. (1995). Naming the Antichrist: The history of an American obsession. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, G. H. (1999). The wound of the beast in the tribulation. Bibliotheca Sacra, 156(624), 459–468.Google Scholar
  10. Hazelip, H. (1975). Revelation 20 and the millennium. Restoration Quarterly, 18(4), 229–235.Google Scholar
  11. Hughes, K. L. (2005). Constructing Antichrist: Paul, biblical commentary, and the development of doctrine in the early Middle Ages. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, P. (Director). (2001). The Lord of the Rings: The fellowship of the ring. New Line Cinema.Google Scholar
  13. Jackson, P. (Director). (2002). The Lord of the Rings: The two towers. New Line Cinema.Google Scholar
  14. Jackson, P. (Director). (2003). The Lord of the Rings: The return of the king. New Line Cinema.Google Scholar
  15. Jung, C. G. (1959). Aion: Researches into the phenomenology of the self (trans: Hull, R. F. C.). In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works of C.G. Jung (Bollingen Series XX, Vol. 9, Pt. II). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kidd, T. S. (2003). Is it worse to follow Mahomet than the devil? Early American uses of Islam. Church History, 72(4), 766–788.Google Scholar
  17. King, S. (1991). The stand. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  18. Krey, P. D. W. (2007). Nicholas of Lyra's commentary on Daniel in the Literal Postill (1329). Geschichte der Daniel-Auslegung in Judentum, Christentum und Islam (pp. 199–215). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  19. Krey, P. D. W., & Smith, L. (Eds.). (2000). Nicholas of Lyra: The senses of scripture. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  20. Lake, P., & Questier, M. (2002). The Antichrist’s lewd hat: Protestants, papists and players in post-reformation England. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Larondelle, H. K. (1989). The Middle Ages within the scope of apocalyptic prophecy. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 32(3), 345–354.Google Scholar
  22. Leppin, V. (1999). Antichrist und Jüngster Tag: Das Profil apokalyptischer Flugschriftenpublizistik im deutschen Luthertum 1548–1618. Quellen und Forschungen zur Reformationsgeschichte, Band 69. Heidelberg: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
  23. Lerner, R. E. (1981). The black death and western European eschatological mentalities. The American Historical Review, 86(3), 533–552.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Levin, I. (1967). Rosemary’s baby. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  25. Lieu, J. (1981). Authority to become children of God: A study of 1 John. Novum Testamentum, 23(3), 210–228.Google Scholar
  26. Lindsey, H., & Carlson, C. C. (1973). The late, great planet earth. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
  27. Lorein, G. W. (2003). The Antichrist theme in the intertestamental period. New York: T & T Clark International.Google Scholar
  28. MacLeod, D. J. (1999). The second ‘last thing’: The defeat of Antichrist (Rev 19:17–21). Bibliotheca Sacra, 156(623), 325–335.Google Scholar
  29. McGinn, B. (1978). Angel pope and papal Antichrist. Church History, 47(2), 155–173.Google Scholar
  30. McGinn, B. (2000). Antichrist: Two thousand years of the human fascination with evil. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Misner, P. (1973). Newman and the tradition concerning the papal Antichrist. Church History, 42(3), 377–395.Google Scholar
  32. Nichols, S. J. (2001). Prophecy makes strange bedfellows: On the history of identifying the Antichrist. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 44(1), 75–85.Google Scholar
  33. O’Leary, S. D. (1994). Arguing the apocalypse: A theory of millennial rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Patai, R. (1979). The Messiah texts. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  35. Patterson, J. A. (1988). Changing images of the beast: Apocalyptic conspiracy theories in American history. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 31(4), 443–452.Google Scholar
  36. Polanski, R. (Director). (1968). Rosemary’s baby. William Castle Productions.Google Scholar
  37. Ratner-Rosenhagen, J. (2006). Conventional iconoclasm: The cultural work of the Nietzsche image in twentieth-century America. The Journal of American History, 93(3), 728–754.Google Scholar
  38. Reeves, M. (1969). The influence of prophecy in the later Middle Ages: A study in Joachinism. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  39. Ricoeur, P. (1967). The symbolism of evil (R. N. Anshen, Ed., trans: Buchanan, E.). New York: Harper & Row. (Reprinted from Religious Perspectives (Vol. 17)).Google Scholar
  40. Shuck, G. W. (2004). Marks of the beast: The left behind novels, identity, and the internalization of evil. Nova Religio, 8(2), 48–63.Google Scholar
  41. Steinmann, A. E. (2005). Is the Antichrist in Daniel 11? Bibliotheca Sacra, 162(646), 195–209.Google Scholar
  42. Strohm, S. (2007). Luthers Vorrede zum Propheten Daniel in seiner Deutschen Bibel. Geschichte der Daniel-Auslegung in Judentum, Christentum und Islam (pp. 219–243). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  43. Tolkien, J. R. R. (1965). The Lord of the Rings. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  44. Wong, D. K. K. (1996). The first horseman of revelation 6. Bibliotheca Sacra, 153(610), 212–226.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Theological UnionBerkeleyUSA