Skip to main content
  • 211 Accesses

Anthropomorphism is the portrayal of the gods and spiritual powers beyond and in the world as having human appearance and qualities. It critically reverses the saying that “humans were made in the image of God” to “the gods were made in the images of humans.” Theriomorphism is the analogous portrayal of spirits in animal form. Anthropomorphism is an ancient, widespread aspect of religion, evident in statues of gods and goddesses as if they were human, as in Egypt (Osiris), Greece (Aphrodite), or India (Krishna). They may blend human and animal images, as in animal-headed human figures. The Roman orator Cicero (106–43 BCE) complained of the “poisonous honey of the poets, who present us with gods afire with rage or mad with lust, and make us the spectators of their wars.” But he concluded that “we must admit there are gods,” due to innate ideas of the divine (Cicero 1972, pp. 87–88). A critical view of anthropomorphism may criticize the former “poisonous honey” and debate the latter...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Anonymous. (1981). The Rig veda (trans: O’Flaherty, W. D.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, H. W. (Ed.). (1961). Kerygma and myth by Rudolf Bultmann and five critics (trans: Fuller, R.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultmann, Rudolf. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bultmann.

  • Cicero, M. (1972). The nature of the Gods (trans: McGregor, H.). Middlesex: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Montaigne, M. (1575/1958). The complete essays of Montaigne (trans: Frame, D. M.). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com. Accessed 30 May 2009.

  • Feuerbach, L. (1841/1957). The essence of Christianity (trans: Eliot, G.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1974). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (24 Vols.) (J. Strachey, Ed.). London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J., & Bekoff, M. (2002). The ten trusts: What we must do to care for the animals we love. San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greist, K. (1996). The nature of the dark matter. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/~redingtn/www/netadv/specr/012/012.html. Accessed May 2009.

  • Guthrie, S. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, J. (1975). Re-visioning psychology. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, R. E. (1921). The thirteen principal upanishads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesus Seminar. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_Seminar.

  • Jung, C. G. (1953–1978). The collected works of C.G. Jung (20 Vols.) (W. McGuire, Ed.; trans: Hull, R. F. C.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachina. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kachina.

  • Maimonides, M. (1956). The guide for the perplexed (trans: Friedländer, M.). New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A. (1973). Analogy in patristic and medieval thought: Dictionary of the history of ideas (Vol. I, pp. 64–67). New York: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Fague, S. (1987). Models of God: Theology for an ecological, nuclear age. Philadelphia: Fortress Press. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sallie_McFague. Accessed 8 Sept 2012.

  • Morton, A. (2002). Listening to whales: What the orcas have taught us. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Pallmeyer, J. (2003). Is religion killing us? Violence in the Bible and the Quran. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R. (1981). Catholicism: Study edition. Minneapolis: Oak Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, K. (1998). Silent thunder: In the presence of elephants. New York: Simon and Chuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1961). The collected dialogues of Plato (E. Hamilton & M. Cairns, Eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan, S., & Moore, C. (1957). A sourcebook in Indian philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierksma, F. (1956). Religious projection (trans: Faber, J.). Ann Arbor: UMI Books on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, M. (2001). Scientism: science, ethics and religion. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thich, N. H. (1995). Living Buddha, living Christ. New York: Putnam’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thich Nhat Hanh. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thich_Nhat_Hanh.

  • Tylor, E. B. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tylor,_Edward_Burnett,_Ll.D.,_F.R.S. Accessed 8 Sept 2012.

  • Walker, W. (1985). A history of the Christian church (4th ed.). New York: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, W. J. (1882). Hindu mythology: Vedic and puranic (2nd ed., 1975, p. 402). Calcutta: Rupa & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Eisendrath, P., & Dawson, T. (Eds.). (1997). The Cambridge companion to Jung. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lee W. Bailey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bailey, L.W. (2014). Anthropomorphism. In: Leeming, D.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6085-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6086-2

  • eBook Packages: Behavioral Science

Publish with us

Policies and ethics