Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2014 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Animism

  • Lee W. Bailey
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_32

A Modern Tool: Tylor

“Animism” is not a religion. It is a theoretical construct that attempts to explain a wide range of religious beliefs and practices. It is a modern concept, a by-product of the theoretical dualistic division between subject and object, grouping together religious beliefs that breach or confuse that division. Originally defined as the erroneous attribution of life or soul to inanimate objects by primitive people, “animism” was developed as a major category in “primitive” religions, a “minimum” definition of natural religion by E. B. Tylor (1832–1917) in his 1871 six-volume, Primitive Culture. Today a “new animism” is developing along quite different, more ecological lines.

Traditional beliefs grouped under this concept originally included the view that a person’s or animal’s shadow, breath, blood, liver, heart, or eye holds their soul. Animals have souls, and all of the earth and sky is full of souls. Some are reincarnated ancestors, some are friendly spirits, and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Bailey, L. (1986). Skull’s lantern: Psychological projection and the magic lantern. Spring, 72–87.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, L. (1988). Skull’s darkroom: The Camera Obscura and subjectivity. Philosophy and Technology, 6, 63–79.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, T., & Brian, S. (1992). The universe story. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  4. Compte, A. (1844/1865). A general view of positivism [Discours sur l’Esprit positif]. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
  5. Feuerbach, L. (1957). The essence of Christianity (trans: Eliot, G.). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  6. Friere-Marreco, B. (Ed.). (1907). Anthropological essays presented to Edward Burnett Tylor. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  7. Goodall, J. (1999). Reason for hope. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  8. Harvey, G. (2006). Animism: Respecting the living world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Heidegger, M. (1927/1962). Being and time (trans: Macquarrie, J. & Robinson, E.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  10. Hillman, J. (1975). Re-visioning psychology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  11. Hillman, J., & Ventura, M. (1992). We’ve had a hundred years of psychotherapy and the world’s getting worse. San Francisco: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  12. Jung, C. G. (1961/1971). In memories, dreams, reflections (A. Jaffé, Ed.; trans: Winston, R. & Winston, C.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  13. Jung, C. G. (1963). The collected works of C.G. Jung (20 vols.) (H. Read, et al., Eds.; trans: Hull, R.F.C.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Levy-Bruhl, L. (1926/1985). How natives think (trans: Clare, L.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Marrett, R. R. (1909). The threshold of religion. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  16. Moore, T. (1992). Care of the soul. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  17. Moore, T. (1996). Re-enchantment of everyday life. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  18. Trimble, S. (Ed.). (1986). Our bodies, our land. Flagstaff: The Heard Museum, Northland Press.Google Scholar
  19. Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture (6 Vols.). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  20. Van Gennep, A. (1909/1961). The rites of passage (trans: Vizedom, M. & Caffee, G.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and ReligionIthaca CollegeIthacaUSA