Skip to main content

Bus Rapid Transit and Light Rail Transit Systems : State of Discussion

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Transportation Technologies for Sustainability

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 749.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Bus rapid transit (BRT):

An integrated bus-oriented public transport service composed of six basic elements: higher-quality, more styled buses; a well-designed service plan, including route structure is faster and more frequent transit service than typically experienced with regular route local bus service; upgraded, appealing passenger stations; roadway infrastructure that gives BRT priority in mixed traffic or separated from other traffic entirely to help ensure faster travel times; intelligent transportation technologies, not only for traffic priority as mentioned above but also for real-time passenger information and vehicle tracking to ensure more ambitious service schedule; and clear, distinct branding and marketing [1].

Bus rapid transit vehicle:

A bus used in BRT service, typically with advanced features such as aerodynamic styling, hybrid electric drive or other advanced propulsion, and real-time tracking systems, similar to what are now used in rail transit systems.

Buy America:

Provisions of federal transit law that govern purchases of goods with federal surface transportation assistance grants. Certain aspects of this policy date back to protectionist sentiments of the 1930s. In 1978, Congress stipulated that for purchases of rolling stock, these would be considered to be US made if they were assembled with at least 60% of components and materials by value supplied by US sources. The rules have been subsequently refined and subject to controversy several times since [3].

Capital assistance/expenditures:

Government subsidies for expenses related to the purchase of equipment and facilities, such as stations, buses, and trains; maintenance facilities; and support systems. Such equipment typically means property that has a useful life of more than 1 year. Capital expenses do not include operating expenses that are eligible to use capital funds.

Commuter rail service:

Regional-distance, usually locomotive-hauled passenger train service often sharing tracks with freight railroads. Chicago’s Metra service is an example.

Federal Transit Administration:

A sub-cabinet-level government agency of the US Department of Transportation that administers a variety of grant programs that help fund bus and rail transit projects in US cities, Puerto Rico, and the US territories, as well as rural areas and federal lands.

Fixed-route bus service:

Traditional form of transit bus service, typically with frequent stops along a defined route. The bus services of the Chicago Transit Authority are an example.

Light rail transit (LRT):

A form of urban rail public transportation that generally has a lower capacity and lower speed than metro (also known as heavy rail) systems, but higher capacity and higher speed than traditional streetcar systems. These rail systems are typically electrically powered, usually by overhead catenary. They ideally operate their own rights-of-way separated from other traffic but if necessary can also operate in mixed traffic on city streets [2].

Modal split:

Term of art in public transportation for market share. That is, the percentage of journeys taken with the various forms of public transportation, as compared with walking, bicycling, or the private automobile.

Operating assistance/expenditures:

Government subsidies for expenses associated with the operation of the transit agency and its passenger services, including vehicle operations (e.g., bus, train, “dial-a-ride,” and vanpool services), vehicle and facility maintenance, and general administration (e.g., marketing, top management, insurance, and finance). Operating expenses also include salaries, wages, and benefits as well as outsourced services under contract.

Privatization:

In its strictest definition, it is the return of publicly owned and operated public transport services to the private sector. However, in the USA, it is also defined as the contracting of publicly owned services to private companies, private participation in the capitalization or ownership of these publicly owned services, or the franchising of these services to private firms.

Public transport service:

Bus and rail services operated either by public or private organizations on a scheduled or on-demand basis. These services are distinct from charters, which are hired for groups such as tours.

Public–private partnerships/models:

Synonymous with most definitions of privatization except the complete return of transit services to private ownership and operation with minimal oversight.

Purchased transportation services:

Bus and train service provided by others through a contract; also called contract service.

Rolling stock:

Industry term for buses and trains and other vehicles used in public transport service.

Transit-oriented development:

Land use patterns such as higher densities around BRT and rail stations that also contribute to greater transit usage on these systems.

Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century:

Also known as TEA 21, the landmark surface transportation assistance law passed in 1998 that ended operating assistance for agencies that served urbanized regions with fewer than 200,000 residents. It also for the first time guaranteed a stream of funding for capital assistance over the 6-year period in which the law was effective, which helped public transportation agencies better manage and plan their capital expenditures.

Travel time savings:

Industry term for the average estimated savings per trip on new transit systems as compared with the average travel time from a commute taken by an automobile or by the previous bus network serving the route.

Urban Mass Transportation Act:

The 1964 federal law that began the federal government’s involvement in the oversight and financial assistance of regional, state, and local public transport services.

Vehicle maintenance:

Activities associated with bus, railcar, and support vehicle (e.g., fueling and repair trucks) maintenance (repairs and routine replacement of parts) and servicing (cleaning, fueling, etc.), also including inspection and oversight of these activities. In addition, vehicle maintenance includes repairs due to vandalism and accidents.

Vehicle operations:

Those activities associated with providing scheduled and on-demand passenger services, such as vehicle dispatching and scheduling, driver and technician training, ticketing and fare collection management, and system security.

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. Federal Transit Administration (2008) Bus rapid transit. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Public Transportation Association (2005–2010) Fact book. American Public Transportation Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. Committee on Rules, United States House of Representatives, U.S. Congress (2005) Safe, accountable, flexible and efficient transportation equity act: a legacy for users: report of the conference committee. U.S. G.P.O, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schumann JW (2010) Status of North American light rail transit systems: year 2009 update, joint international light rail conference: growth and renewal, 19–21 Apr 2009, Los Angeles, California. Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular E-C145, July 2010, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  5. U.S. General Accounting Office (2001) Mass transit: bus rapid transit shows promise: report to Congressional Requesters, GAO report #GAO-01-984. GAO, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) (2005) FY03-FY07 metro strategic performance plan (Updated FY05). Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kantor D, Peak M, Wnuk L (2008) Analysis of BRT vehicle market and ridership trends. WestStart-CALSTART, Pasadena

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schlosser N (Apr 2010) New BRT projects gather momentum across the U.S. Metro, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schumann, ibid, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smithsonian Institution (2005) American on the move: streetcar city, Washington, DC: growth of the capital’s suburbs. http://americanhistory.si.edu/onthemove/exhibition/exhibition_4_7.html. Accessed 12 Sept 2005

  11. Richmond J (2005) Transport of delight: the mythical conception of rail transit in Los Angeles. The University of Akron Press, Akron

    Google Scholar 

  12. Union of International Public Transport (2003) Ticket to the future: three stops to sustainable mobility. Union of International Public Transport, Brussels, March

    Google Scholar 

  13. Henke C (1996) The french answer. Metro, May–June

    Google Scholar 

  14. San Francisco County Transportation Authority (2006) Geary corridor bus rapid transit design principles & guidelines, approved by Geary Citizens Advisory Committee, 1 Dec 2006

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kirschbaum J, Chang T (2005) ACTION – adopt a motion to approve the proposed approach to the concept of rail-ready design in the Geary BRT study and the proposed Q&A language, memorandum to the Geary Citizens Advisory Committee, 18 Feb 2005

    Google Scholar 

  16. (Aug 2005) Convertible transit. Railway Age

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sallee R (2005) Metro told using buses over rail hurts credibility. Houston Chronicle, 28 June 2005

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade, Douglas Inc. (2005) Sound transit long-range plan update, issue paper no.5: convertibility of BRT to light rail, prepared for sound transit, Mar 2005

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wood E, Shelton DS, Shelden M (2005) Designing BRT for LRT convertability: an introduction for planners and decision-makers, presented at the annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington DC, final version Nov 2005

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., Technical Memorandum to San Francisco County Transportation Authority (Feb 2008) Geary BRT rail readiness analysis

    Google Scholar 

Books and Reviews

  • Bill Millar (president of APTA) (2004) Testimony before the subcommittee on transportation, treasury & independent agencies, committee on appropriations, U.S. house of representatives, 19 Mar 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office (1981) The effect of OPEC oil pricing on output, prices and exchange rates in the United States and other industrialized countries. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, February

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudahy BJ (1990) Cash, tokens and transfers: a history of urban mass transit in North America. Forham University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar H, Ohland G (2004) The new transit town: best practices in transit-oriented development. The Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RJ, Kochtitzky C (2002) Creating a healthy environment: the impact of the built environment on public health. Sprawl Watch Clearinghouse, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro RJ, Hassett KA, Arnold FS (2002) Conserving energy and preserving the environment: the role of public transportation. American Public Transportation Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelby RC et al (2003) Bus rapid transit and other bus service innovations: hearing before Senate banking, housing and rban affairs committee. U.S. G.P.O, 24 June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Small K (2005) Unnoticed lessons from London: road pricing and public transit. Access 26(Spring):10–15

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Treasury and Council of Economic Advisers (2010) An economic analysis of infrastructure investment. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, October 11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cliff Henke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Henke, C. (2013). Bus Rapid Transit and Light Rail Transit Systems : State of Discussion. In: Ehsani, M., Wang, FY., Brosch, G.L. (eds) Transportation Technologies for Sustainability. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5844-9_666

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics