Renewable Energy Systems

2013 Edition
| Editors: Martin Kaltschmitt, Nickolas J. Themelis, Lucien Y. Bronicki, Lennart Söder, Luis A. Vega

Wind Power: Basic Challenge Concerning Social Acceptance

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5820-3_88

Definition of the Subject

Successful implementation of new technologies requires social acceptance. Historically, for the implementation of wind energy this was considered a relatively simple issue that could be addressed by applying effective communication strategies. Without much study, social acceptance of wind power was considered a matter of merely public acceptance and any problems with public acceptance were viewed as issues of education. Furthermore, public acceptance was primarily negatively defined, under the heading of “nontechnical factors” [1].

However, innovation must be considered a much broader concept, as there is nothing inevitable about how new technology is developed and implemented. The willingness to accept phenomena related to innovation of different parts of society, including all realms beyond “the public,” can be subdivided in two broad categories:
  • Acceptance of the creation of new socioeconomic conditions needed for implementation.

  • Acceptance of the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. 1.
    Carlman I (1982) Wind energy potential in Sweden: the importance of non-technical factors. In: Fourth international symposium wind energy systems, Stockholm, pp 335–348, 21–24 Sept 1982Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bosley P, Bosley K (1988) Public acceptability of California’s wind energy development: three studies. Wind Eng 12:311–318Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wolsink M (1986) Public acceptance of large WECS in the Netherlands. In: European wind energy conference, 1986, vol II. Raguzzi, Rome, pp 587–592Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thayer RL, Freeman C (1987) Public perceptions of a wind energy landscape. Landscape Urban Plan 14:379–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carlman I (1984) The views of politicians and decision-makers on planning for the use of wind power in Sweden. In: European wind energy conference, Hamburg, pp 339–343, 22–36 Oct 1984Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wolsink M (1987) Wind power for the electricity supply of houses. Neth J House Environ Res 2:95–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aitken M (2010) Why we still don’t understand the social aspects of wind power: a critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energ Policy 38:1134–1841Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer MJ (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energ Policy 35:2683–2691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bijker WE, Law J (eds) (1992) Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geels FW (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems – insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res Policy 33:897–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hekkert M, Suurs RAA, Negro SO, Kuhlmann S, Smits REHM (2007) Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technol Forecast Soc 74:413–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jacobsson S, Johnson A (2000) The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research. Energ Policy 28:625–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kamp LM, Smit REHM, Andriesse CD (2004) Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark. Energ Policy 32:1625–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thelen K (1999) Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annu Rev Polit Sci 2:369–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scott WR (1987) The adolescence of institutional theory. Admin Sci Quart 32: 117, 493–511Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (eds) (1991) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoogwijk M, de Vries B, Turkenburg W (2004) Assessment of the global and regional geographical technical and economic potential of on-shore of wind energy. Energ Econ 26:889–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yue C-D, Min-How Y (2009) Exploring the potential of wind energy for a coastal state. Energ Policy 37:3925–3940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sovacool BK (2009) Rejecting renewables: the socio-technical impediments to renewable electricity in the United States. Energ Policy 37:4500–4513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wolsink M, Breukers S (2010) Contrasting the core beliefs regarding the effective implementation of wind power international study stakeholder perspectives. J Environ Plann Man 53:535–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jessup B (2010) Plural and hybrid environmental values: a discourse analysis of the wind energy conflict in Australia and the United Kingdom. Environ Polit 19:21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wolsink M (2000) Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renew Energ 21:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995) The need to belong – desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull 117:497–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rhodes RAW (1996) The new governance: governing without government. Polit Stud 44:652–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ackermann T, Andersson G, Söder L (2001) Distributed generation: a definition. Electr Pow Syst Res 57:105–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Devine-Wright P, Devine-Wright H (2006) Social representations of intermittency and the shaping of public support for wind energy in the UK. Int J Glob Energ 25:243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Dec 50:179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ajzen I (2001) Nature and operation of attitudes. Annu Rev Psychol 52:27–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bang HK, Ellinger AE, Hadjimarcou J, Traichal PA (2000) Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitudes toward renewable energy: an application of the reasoned action theory. Psychol Market 17:449–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dinica V (2008) Initiating a sustained diffusion of wind power: the role of public-private partnerships in Spain. Energ Policy 36:3562–3571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Möller B (2006) Changing wind-power landscapes: regional assessment of visual impact on land use and population in Northern Jutland, Denmark. Appl Energ 83:477–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Walker G, Devine-Wright P (2008) Community renewable energy: what should it mean? Energ Policy 36:497–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bell D, Gray T, Haggett C (2005) The ‘social gap’ in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses. Environ Polit 14:460–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Toke D (2005) Explaining wind power planning outcomes: some findings from a study in England and Wales. Energ Policy 33:1527–1539Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) (2009) Wind energy: the facts. A guide to the technology, economics and future of wind power. Earthscan, London/SterlingGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Freudenburg WR, Pastor SK (1992) Nimbys and lulus: stalking the syndromes. J Soc Issues 48:39–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Devine-Wright P (2005) Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energ 8:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kahn RD (2000) Siting struggles: the unique challenge of permitting renewable energy power plants. Electr J 13:21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wolsink M (2006) Invalid theory impedes our understanding: a critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY. T I Brit Geogr 31:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wolsink M (1989) Attitudes and expectancies about wind turbines and wind farms. Wind Eng 13:196–206Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Warren CR, Lumsden C, O’Dowd S, Birnie RV (2005) ‘Green on green’: public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. J Environ Plann Man 48:853–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jones CR, Eiser JR (2009) Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study. Energ Policy 37:4604–4614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kempton W, Firestone J, Lilley J, Rouleau T, Whitaker P (2005) The off-shore wind power debate. Views Cape Cod. Coast Manage 33:119–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Devine-Wright P (2011) From backyards to places: public engagement and the emplacement of renewable energy technologies. In: Devine-Wright P (ed) Renewable energy and the public: from NIMBY to participation. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sjöberg L, Drottz-Sjöberg B (2001) Fairness, risk and risk tolerance in the siting of a nuclear waste repository. J Risk Res 4:75–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wolsink M, Devilee J (2009) The motives for accepting or rejecting waste infrastructure facilities. Shifting the focus from the planners’ perspective to fairness and community commitment. J Environ Plann Man 52:217–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Oxford English Dictionary (2010) http://dictionary.oed.com/entrance.dtl. Accessed 15 Apr 2010
  49. 49.
    Dear M (1992) Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. J Am Plann Assoc 58:288–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Swofford J, Slattery M (2010) Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making. Energ Policy 38:2508–2519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Toke D, Breukers S, Wolsink M (2008) Wind power deployment outcomes: how can we account for the differences? Ren Sust Energ Rev 12:1129–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wolsink M (2007) Planning of renewables schemes. Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energ Policy 35:2692–2704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Marques AC, Fuinhas JA (2011) Drivers promoting renewable energy: a dynamic panel approach. Ren Sust Energ Rev 15:1601–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bohn C, Lant C (2009) Welcoming the wind? Determinants of wind power development among U.S. states. Prof Geogr 61:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Menz FC, Vachon S (2006) The effectiveness of different policy regimes for promoting wind power: experiences from the states. Energ Policy 34:1786–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ohl C, Eichhorn M (2010) The mismatch between regional spatial planning for wind power development in Germany and national eligibility criteria for feed-in tariffs – a case study in West Saxony. Land Use Policy 27:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Breukers S, Wolsink M (2007) Wind energy policies in the Netherlands: institutional capacity-building for ecological modernisation. Environ Polit 16:92–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Heiman MK, Solomon BD (2004) Power to the people: electric utility restructuring and the commitment to renewable energy. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 94:94–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wilson EJ, Stephens J (2009) Wind deployment in the United States: states, resources, policy, and discourse. Environ Sci Technol 43:9063–9070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sabatier PA (1998) The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. J Eur Publ Pol 5:98–130MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453–458MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Walker G (1995) Renewable energy and the public. Land Use Policy 12:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Eurobarometer (2007) Energy technologies: knowledge, perception measures. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ansolabehere S, Konisky DM (2009) Public attitudes toward construction of new power plants. Public Opin Quart 73:566–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Klick H, Smith ERAN (2010) Public understanding of and support for wind power in the United States. Renew Energy 35:1585–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wolsink M (2007) Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of “backyard motives”. Ren Sust Energ Rev 11:1188–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ellis G, Barry J, Robinson C (2007) Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: applying q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. J Environ Plann Man 50:517–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ek K (2005) Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: the case of Swedish wind power. Energ Policy 33:1677–1689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Clark CF, Kotchen MJ, Moore MR (2003) Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: participation in a green electricity program. J Environ Psychol 23:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ellis G, Cowell R, Warren C, Strachan P, Szarka J (2009) Expanding wind power: a problem of planning or of perception? Plann Theory Pract 10:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Muñoz M, Oschmann V, Tabara JD (2007) Harmonization of renewable electricity feed-in laws in the European Union. Energ Policy 35:3104–3114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Lauber V (2004) REFIT and RPS: options for a harmonised community framework. Energ Policy 32:1405–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Toke D (2007) Renewable financial support systems and cost-effectiveness. J Cleaner Prod 15:280–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Jacobsson S, Lauber V (2006) The politics and policy of energy system transformation – explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energ Policy 34:256–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Mitchell C, Bauknecht D, Connor PM (2006) Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany. Energ Policy 34:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Krewitt W, Nitsch J (2003) The German Renewable Energy Sources Act. An investment into the future pays off already today. Renew Energy 28:533–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Toke D (2005) Are green certificates the way forward for renewable energy? An evaluation of the UK’s Renewable obligation in the context of international comparisons. Environ Plann C 23:361–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Jacobsson S, Bergek A, Finon D, Lauber V, Mitchell C, Toke D, Verbruggen A (2009) EU renewable energy support policy: faith or facts? Energ Policy 37:2143–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Toke D (2008) The EU renewables directive – what is the fuss about trading? Energ Policy 36:3001–3008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Cowell R (2007) Wind power and “the planning problem”: the experience of Wales. Eur Environ 17:291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bergek A (2010) Levelling the playing field? The influence of national wind power planning instruments on conflicts of interests in a Swedish county. Energ Policy 38:2357–2369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Toke D (2005) Explaining wind power planning outcomes: some findings from a study in England and Wales. Energ Policy 33:1527–1539Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Dimitropoulos A, Kontoleon A (2009) Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind-farm investment: a choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands. Energ Policy 37:1842–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Loring J MacLaren (2007) Wind energy planning in England, Wales and Denmark: factors influencing project success. Energ Policy 35:2648–2660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Aitken M, McDonald S, Strachan P (2008) Locating ‘power’ in wind power planning processes: the (not so) influential role of local objectors. J Environ Plann Man 51:777–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Söderholm P, Ek K, Petterson M (2007) Wind power development in Sweden: global policies and local obstacles. Ren Sust Energ Rev 11:365–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Agterbosch S, Breukers S (2008) Socio-political embedding of onshore wind power in the Netherlands and North Rhine-Westphalia. Technol Anal Strateg Man 20:633–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Mannarini T, Roccato M, Fedi A, Rovere A (2009) Six factors fostering protest: predicting participation in locally unwanted land uses movements. Polit Psychol 30:895–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Wolsink M (2010) Contested environmental policy infrastructure: socio-political acceptance of renewable energy, water, and waste facilities. Environ Impact Asses 30:302–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Devlin E (2005) Factors affecting public acceptance of wind turbines in Sweden. Wind Eng 29:503–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Musall FD, Kuik O (2011) Local acceptance of renewable energy – A case study from southeast Germany. Energ Policy 39:3252–3260Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Warren CR, McFadyen M (2010) Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy 27:204–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Hindmarsh R, Matthews C (2008) Deliberative speak at the turbine face: community engagement, wind farms, and renewable energy transitions. J Environ Pol Plann 10:217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Graham JB, Stephenson JR, Smith IJ (2009) Public perceptions of wind energy developments: case studies from New Zealand. Energ Policy 37:3348–3357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Wester-Herber M (2004) Underlying concerns in land-use conflicts – the role of place-identity in risk perception. Environ Sci Pol 7:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Jackson JB (1994) A sense of place, a sense of time. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Devine-Wright P, Howes Y (2010) Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: a wind energy case study. J Environ Psychol 30:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Vorkinn M, Riese H (2001) Environmental concern in a local context. The significance of place attachment. Environ Behav 33:249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Stedman RC (2002) Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Soc Nat Res 16:671–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Woods M (2003) Conflicting environmental visions of the rural: windfarm development in Mid Wales. Sociol Ruralis 43:171–288Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Bergmann A, Colombo S, Hanley N (2008) Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developments. Ecol Econ 65:616–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Moragues-Faus AM, Ortiz-Miranda D (2010) Local mobilization against wind farm developments in Spanish rural areas: new actors in the regulation arena. Energ Policy 38:4232–4240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Cowell R, Bristow G, Munday M (2011) Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development. J Environ Plann Man 54:539–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Dincer I (2000) Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review. Ren Sust Energ Rev 4:157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    delRio P, Burguillo M (2008) Assessing the impact of renewable energy deployment on local sustainability: towards a theoretical framework. Ren Sust Energ Rev 12:1325–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Faulin J, Lera F, Pintor JM, García J (2006) The outlook for renewable energy in Navarre: an economic profile. Energ Policy 34:2201–2216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Hillebrand B, Buttermann H, Behringer J, Bleuerl M (2006) The expansion of renewable energies and employment effects in Germany. Energ Policy 34:3484–3494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Kaldellis JK, Zafirakis D (2007) Present situation and future prospects of electricity generation in Aegean Archipelago islands. Energ Policy 35:4623–4639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Dalton GJ, Lockington DA, Baldock TE (2008) A survey of tourist attitudes to renewable energy supply in Australian hotel accommodation. Renew Energy 33:2174–2185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Frantál B, Kunc J (2011) Wind turbines in tourism landscapes: Czech experience. Ann Tourism Res 38:499–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Riddington G, McArthur D, Harrison T, Gibson H (2010) Assessing the economic impact of wind farms on tourism in Scotland: GIS, surveys and policy outcomes. Int J Tourism Res 12:237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Lilley MB, Firestone J, Kempton W (2010) The effect of wind power installations on coastal tourism. Energies 3:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Gross C (2007) Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia. The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energ Policy 35:2727–2736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Mumford J, Gray D (2010) Consumer engagement in alternative energy – can the regulators and suppliers be trusted? Energ Policy 38:2664–2671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Frey BS, Oberholzer-Gee F (1997) The cost of price-incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding out. Am Econ Rev 87:746–755Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Aitken M (2010) Wind power and community benefits: challenges and opportunities. Energ Policy 38:6066–6075Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Breukers S, Wolsink M (2007) Wind power in changing institutional landscapes: an international comparison. Energ Policy 35:2737–2750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Zarnikau J (2003) Consumer demand for ‘green’ power and energy efficiency. Energ Policy 31:1661–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Wüstenhagen R, Bilharz M (2006) Green energy market development in Germany: effective public policy and emerging customer demand. Energ Policy 34:1681–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    MacKay DJC (2008) Sustainable energy – without the hot air. UIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Bolinger MA (2005) Making European-style community wind power development work in the US. Ren Sust Energ Rev 8:556–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Han JY, Mol APJ, Lu YL, Zhang L (2009) Onshore wind power development in China: challenges behind a successful story. Energ Policy 37:2941–2951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Sanden BA (2008) ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technol Anal Strateg 20:575–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Bird L, Bolinger M, Gagliano T, Wiser R, Brown M, Parsons B (2005) Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States. Energ Policy 33:1397–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Lewis JI, Wiser RH (2007) Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: an international comparison of wind industry support mechanisms. Energ Policy 35:1844–1857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manage J 43:717–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Kaldellis JK, Kavadias KA, Paliatsos AG (2004) Environmental impacts of wind energy applications: "Myth or reality?". Fresen Environ Bull 13:413–423Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Bishop I (2002) Determination of thresholds of visual impact: the case of wind turbines. Environ Plann B 29:707–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Kaldellis JK (2006) Evaluation of Greek wind parks visual impact “public attitude and experts’ opinion”. Fresen Environ Bull 15:1419–1426Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Brittan GG (2001) Wind, energy, landscape: reconciling nature and technology. Philos Geogr 4:169–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Mercer D (2003) The great Australian wind rush and the devaluation of landscape amenity. Austral Geogr 34:91–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Johansson M, Laike T (2007) Intention to respond to local wind turbines: the role of attitudes and visual perception. Wind Energy 10:435–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Zografos C, Martinez-Allier J (2009) The politics of landscape value: a case study of wind farm conflict in rural Catalonia. Environ Plann A 41:1726–1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Bishop ID, Miller DR (2007) Visual assessment of off-shore wind turbines: the influence of distance, contrast, movement and social variables. Renew Energ 32:814–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Ladenburg J, Dubgaard A (2009) Preferences of coastal zone user groups regarding the siting of offshore wind farms. Ocean Coast Manage 52:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Haggett C (2008) Over the sea and far away? A consideration of the planning, politics and public perception of offshore wind farms. J Environ Pol Plann 10:289–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Ladenburg J (2009) Visual impact assessment of offshore wind farms and prior experience. Appl Energ 86:380–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Gonzalez MI, Estevez B (2005) Participation, communication and negotiation in environmental conflicts: offshore wind energy in the Trafalgar Sea area. Arbor-Ciencia Pensamiento y Cultura 181:377–392Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Phadke R (2010) Steel forests or smoke stacks: the politics of visualisation in the Cape Wind controversy. Environ Polit 19:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Wolsink M (2010) Near-shore wind power – protected seascapes, environmentalists’ attitudes, and the technocratic planning perspective. Land Use Policy 27:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Bell S (1999) Landscape: pattern, perception and process. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Lothian A (1999) Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape Urban Plan 44:177–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Parsons R, Daniel TC (2002) Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape Urban Plan 60:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Jay S (2010) Planners to the rescue: spatial planning facilitating the development of offshore wind energy. Mar Pollut Bull 60:493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Gray T, Haggett C, Bell D (2005) Offshore windfarms and commercial fisheries in the UK: a study in stakeholder consultation. Ethics Place Environ 8:127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Michler-Cieluch T, Krause G, Buck BH (2009) Reflections on integrating operation and maintenance activities of offshore wind farms and mariculture. Ocean Coast Manage 52:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Sovacool BK (2009) Contextualizing avian mortality: a preliminary appraisal of bird and bat fatalities from wind, fossil-fuel and nuclear electricity. Energ Policy 37:2241–2248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Solli J (2010) Where the eagles dare? Enacting resistance to wind farms through hybrid collectives. Environ Polit 19:45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Nadaï A, Labussière O (2010) Birds, wind and the making of wind power landscapes in Aude, Southern France. Landscape Res 35:209–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Verkuijlen E, Westra CA (1984) Shadow hindrance by wind turbines. In: European wind energy conference, Hamburg, pp 356–361Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Wolsink M, Sprengers M (1993) Windturbine noise: a new environmental threat? In: Vallet M (ed) Noise as a public health problem, vol 2. INRETS, Bron, pp 235–238Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Pedersen E, Persson-Waye K (2007) Wind turbine noise, annoyance and self-reported health and well-being in different living environments. Occup Environ Med 2007:480–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Pedersen E, Larsman P (2008) The impact of visual factors on noise annoyance among people living in the vicinity of wind turbines. J Environ Psychol 28:379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Dalby S, Mackenzie F (1997) Re-conceptualising local community: environment, identity and threat. Area 29:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Walker G, Devine-Wright P, Hunter S, High H, Evans B (2010) Trust and community: exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energ Policy 38:2655–2663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Higgs G, Berry R, Kidner D, Langford M (2008) Using IT approaches to promote public participation in renewable energy planning: prospects and challenges. Land Use Policy 25:596–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Bishop ID, Stock C (2010) Using collaborative virtual environments to plan wind energy installations. Renew Energ 35:2348–2355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Chicco G, Mancarefla P (2009) Distributed multi-generation: a comprehensive view. Ren Sust Energ Rev 13:535–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Gardner J, Car-Cornish SG, Ashworth PN (2008) Exploring the acceptance of a domestic distributed energy market in Australia. Australasian J Environ Man 15:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Charles D (2009) Renewables test IQ of the grid. Science 324:172–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Stadler I (2008) Power grid balancing of energy systems with high renewable energy penetration by demand response. Utilit Policy 16:90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Green RC, Wang L, Alam M (2011) The impact of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on distributed networks: a review and outlook. Ren Sust Energ Rev 15:544–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Marris E (2008) Upgrading the grid. Nature 454:570–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Books and Reviews

  1. Agterbosch S (2006) Empowering wind power. On social and institutional conditions affecting the performance of entrepreneurs in the wind power supply market in the Netherlands. Netherland Geographical Studies 351, KNAG, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  2. Breukers SC (2007) Institutional capacity building for wind power, a geographical comparison. Vossius Pers/Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, http://dare.uva.nl/record/209600 [Open access]
  3. Devine-Wright P (ed) (2011) Renewable energy and the public: from NIMBY to participation. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellis G, Cowell R, Warren C, Strachan P, Szarka J, Hadwin R, Miner P, Wolsink M, Nadai A (2009) Interface. Wind power: is there a “planning problem”? Plann Theory Pract 10:521–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jay SA (2008) At the margins of planning. Offshore wind farms in the United Kingdom. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  6. Kahn J (2004) Local politics of renewable energy. Project planning, siting conficts and citizen participation. Lund University, PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  7. MacKay DJC (2008). Sustainable energy – without the hot air. www.withouthotair.com [Open access]
  8. Nadaï A, van der Horst D (eds) (2010) Wind power planning, landscapes and publics. Land Use Policy 27(Special Issue):181–254Google Scholar
  9. Scheer H (2002) The solar economy: renewable energy for a sustainable global future. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Sovacool B (2008) The dirty energy dilemma: what’s blocking clean power in the Unitied States? Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  11. Szarka J (2007) Wind power in Europe: politics, business and society. Macmillan Palgrave, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer MJ (eds) (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation. Energ Policy 35(Special Issue):2683–2810Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography, Planning and International Development StudiesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands