Skip to main content

Biomass Pyrolysis

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Renewable Energy Systems
  • 4730 Accesses

Definition and Importance of the Subject

Pyrolysis is the oxygen free thermochemical conversion of materials. Pyrolysis turns a feed like biomass into three major products: gases, liquids, and char. The char contains the ash and is often called biochar . Pyrolysis is able to condition or liquefy biomass. For most of the processes and feedstock materials the liquid contains of two phases, a water rich and organic rich fraction.

By means of pyrolysis, several types of biomass feedstock can be made suitable for gasification or combustion. A solid feed is turned into gas and liquid, or a slurry, which is a mixture of liquid and char. For combustion purpose, the char is very suitable which is in most cases bridle and possible to use in a coal-fired power plant or a biomass power plant.

Introduction

Pyrolysis in general is the thermochemical conversion of feed material under the absence of oxygen. Pyrolysis reactors exist in various designs and for various pyrolysis conditions as fast,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Fast pyrolysis:

Heat up of the sample within 1–2 s and the condensation of products within seconds.

Intermediate pyrolysis:

Heat up of the sample within minutes (1–10) and the rapid condensation of products within seconds.

Pyrolysis:

Pyrolysis is the thermochemical conversion of feed material under the absence of oxygen; usually products of pyrolysis are char, liquid, and gas.

Slow pyrolysis:

Heat up of the sample within hours or days.

Thermochemical conversion:

Treatment of material at elevated temperature and which is causing chemical conversion reactions like cracking, radical reactions, decarboxylation, and so on.

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. Cuevas A, Reinoso C, Scott DS (1995) Pyrolysis oil production and its perspectives. In: Proceedings of the power producition from biomass II, Espoo, 29–30 March 1995. VTT, Espoo

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robson A (2001) PyNe newsletter no. 11. Aston University, Birmingham, pp 1–2. ISSN 1470-3521

    Google Scholar 

  3. McLellan R (2000) PyNe newsletter no 10. Aston University, Birmingham, p 12. ISSN 1470-3521

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hornung A, Sagi S, Marongiu A, Seifert H (2008) Evaluation of the formal kinetic parameters and degradation mechanisms for the pyrolysis of lignin by thermogravimetry mass-spectrometry. In: Proceedings of the international conference 16th European biomass conference and exhibition, Feria Valencia, 2–6 June 2008

    Google Scholar 

  5. Trebbi G, Rossi C, Pedrelli G (1997) Plans for the production and utilisation of biooil from biomass fast pyrolysis. In: Bridgwater AV, Boocock DGB (eds) Developments in thermochemical biomass conversion. Blackie Academic, London, pp 378–387

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Rossi C, Graham RB (1997) Fast pyrolysis at ENEL. In: Kaltschmitt MK, Bridgwater AV (eds) Biomass gasification and pyrolysis. CPL Scientific, Newbury, pp 300–306

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boukis L, Gyftopoulou ME, Papamichael I (2001) Biomass fast pyrolysis in an air-blown circulating fluidised bed reactor. In: Bridwater AV (ed) Progress in thermochemical biomass conversion. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 1259–1267

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Meier D (2005) New ablative pyrolyser in operation in Germany. PyNe newsletter 17. Aston University, Birmingham, pp 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lede J, Panagopoulos J, Li HZ, Villermaux J (1985) Fast pyrolysis of wood: direct measurement and study of ablation rate. Fuel 64:1514–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diebold JP, Scahill J (1987) Production of primary pyrolysis oils in a vortex reactor. In: Ratcliff CT, Suuberg EM, Vorres KS (eds) Production analysis and upgrading of oils from biomass (pyrolysis oils from biomass: producing, analyzing, upgrading), vol 32(2). American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bridgwater AV (2009) Fast pyrolysis of biomass. In: Bridgwater AV, Hofbauer H, van Loo S (eds) Thermal biomass conversion. CPL Press, Newbury, pp 42–45

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dahmen N, Dinjus E, Henrich E (2007) Erdöl – Erdgas – Kohle 123(3):OG31

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prins W, Wagenaar BM (1997) Review of rotating cone technology for flash pyrolysis of biomass. In: Kaltschmitt MK, Bridgwater AV (eds) Biomass gasification and pyrolysis. CPL Scientific, Newbury, pp 316–326

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wagenaar BM, Venderbosch RH, Carrasco J, Strenziok R, Van der Aa BJ (2001) Rotating cone bio-oil production and applications. In: Bridgwater AV (ed) Progress in thermochemical biomass conversion. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 1268–1280

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Oeck RC (1982) US Patent 4,412,889

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meszaros MW (1996) Advanced recycling technologies for plastics. In: Khan MR (ed) Conversion and utilization of waste materials. Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meszaros MW (1995) Advances in plastics recycling. Thermal depolymeriation of thermoplastic mixtures, vol 609, ACS symposium series. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 170–182

    Google Scholar 

  18. McIntosh MJ, Arzoumanidis GG (1995) US Patent 5,662,052

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hornung A (1997) Entwicklung eines Verfahrens zur fraktionierten thermischen Zersetzung von Kunststoffgemischen, Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, 3, 484. VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hornung A, Hornung U, Bockhorn H (1996) DE 196 20 721

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hornung U (1996) Bestimmung der Vergasungskinetik von Kunststoffen mit Hilfe eines isotherm betriebenen Kreislaufreaktors. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, 3, 485. VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sea Marconi Technologies (2000) EP 00830831.4

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hornung A, Koch W, Schöner J, Furrer J, Seifert H (2002) Stepwise pyrolysis of electronic scrap. In: Björkman B, Samuelsson C, Wikström JO (eds) TMS fall 2002 extraction and processing division meeting on recycling and waste treatment in mineral and metal processing: technical and economic aspects, vol 2. GTC-Print AB, Lulea, pp 103–108

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hornung A, Seifert H (2004) Pyrolyse von E-Schrott. In: Pyrolyse- und Vergasungs-verfahren in der Energietechnik – Bio-Fuel-Konzepte. Saxonia Standortentwicklungs- und –verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH, Freiberg, 16, pp 237–251

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hornung A, Donner S, Koch W, Schöner J, Seifert H (2004) Haloclean/Pydra – thermal-chemical recycling of WEEE. In: Hornung A, Schöner J, Seifert H (eds) MoDeSt workshop on recycling of polymeric material. Wissenschaftliche Berichte, FZKA 7005

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hornung A, Apfelbacher A (2009) Patent GB 246,0156

    Google Scholar 

  27. Khor KH, Lim KO (2008) Slow pyrolysis of oil palm EFB. Int Energy J 9:181–188

    Google Scholar 

  28. Das P, Ganesh A (2004) Bio-oil from pyrolysis of cashew nut shell-a near fuel. Biomass Bioenergy 27:265–275. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00182-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abdullah N, Gerhauser H (2008) Bio-oil derived from empty fruit bunches. Fuel 87:2606–2613. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2008.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brocksiepe H-G (1986) Charcoal. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry, 5th edn, vol A6. VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  31. Domac J, Trossero M (2008) Industrial charcoal production. TCP/CRO/3101 (A) Development of a sustainable charcoal industry. Zagreb, Croatia

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bridgwater AV, Carson P, Coulson M (2007) A comparison of fast and slow pyrolysis liquids from mallee. Int J Global Energy Issues 27(2):204–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hornung A (2008) High integrative, CO2 negative, high efficient power generation from ash rich biomass in power plants of 10 MW and coupled production of algae based bio oils as well as black earth (dark soil) avoiding effluents at Hainhaus/Odenwald – “ICONE Power nach dem BtVB Prozess. Bioenta Reichelsheim, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hornung A (2009) Bio-thermal valorisation of biomass: the BtVB process at Hainhaus/Odenwald. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international congress on biodiesel, AOCS, Munich, 15–17 Nov 2009

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hornung A, Apfelbacher A, Seifert H (2005) Thermo-chemical conversion of straw – Haloclean, an optimised low temperature pyrolysis. In: 14th European biomass conference and exhibition, biomass for energy, industry and climate protection, Paris, 17–21 Oct 2005

    Google Scholar 

Books and Reviews

  • Ahmedna M, Marshall WE, Rao RM (2000) Production of granular activated carbons from select agricultural by-products and evaluation of their physical, chemical and adsorption properties. Bioresour Technol 71:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch HE, Redlick R (1969) Rice hull method, apparatus and product. US Patent 3,451,944

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornung U, Schneider D, Hornung A, Tumiatti V, Seifert H (2009) Sequential pyrolysis and catalytic low temperature reforming of wheat straw. J Anal Appl Pyrol 85:145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Jing S, Wang J, Wang Z, Jin Y (2001) Silica white obtained from rice husk in a fluidized bed. Powder Technol 117:232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh GH, Park Ch R (2002) Preparation and characteristics of rice-straw-based porous carbons with high adsorption capacity. Fuel 81:327–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun R, Thomkinson J, Mao FC, Sun XF (2001) Physiochemical characterization of lignins from rice straw by hydrogen peroxide treatment. J Appl Polym Sci 79:719–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun ChH, Park YH, Park ChR (2001) Effects of pre-carbonization on porosity development of activated carbons from rice straw. Carbon 39:559–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Hornung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex 1: Example: Haloclean Pyrolysis and Gasification of Straw

Annex 1: Example: Haloclean Pyrolysis and Gasification of Straw

Pyrolysis of straw is still an issue for most of the existing pyrolysis units in the field of fast and slow pyrolysis. The Haloclean process has already been tested in 2005 in a campaign of 5 weeks for the conversion of 15 t of straw into liquids, gas, and char. Later on, the liquids and the char have been successfully converted to synthesize gas in a commercial-scale gasifier [35].

The Haloclean-reactor has been used in a temperature range of 320–500°C. Typical for this reactor are short residence times (1–10 min for the solid residues) for pyrolysis of chaffed straw, finely ground straw, and straw pellets with variable residence times of about 0.3–60 s for the gas phase and gaseous pyrolysis liquids. The Haloclean-reactor consists of a rotary kiln equipped with an internally nitrogen purged and heated screw. During the pyrolysis, metal spheres are transported through the rotary kiln for a better heat transfer.

A very important result of this test is that the shape and size of the feed can be variable without changing the performance of the reactor.

Figure 14 shows that at low temperature (325°C), the coke yield is much higher than the yield of oil (73:18), while at higher temperature (375°C), the ratio coke/oil is 38:37 (1:1). At a pyrolysis temperature of 385°C, the ratio coke/oil is at an optimum of 36:41.6. Therefore, it is possible to obtain with the Haloclean pyrolysis up to 5% more oil than coke.

Biomass Pyrolysis. Figure 14
figure 2257figure 2257

Yield of pyrolysis products – powdered straw

Generally one can see that the amount of pyrolysis gas is increasing with increasing temperature; at 400°C, the amount of pyrolysis oil is decreasing due to the fact that more and more pyrolysis oil is degraded to pyrolysis gas .

The dimensions of the Haloclean-pyrolysis pilot plant are shown in Fig. 15. Below the dimensions of such a plant are given exemplarily.

  • Diameter of the pipe: do = 273 mm, di = 253 mm

  • Length of the oven: 2,200 mm

  • Total length: 4,500 mm

  • Diameter of the screw: 116 mm

  • Draft of the screw: 150 mm

  • Heat transfer medium: Spheres m = 70 g, d = 25 mm

Biomass Pyrolysis. Figure 15
figure 2258figure 2258

Scheme of the Haloclean-pyrolysis pilot plant

Below, results of the pyrolysis of straw are shown as an example.

  • Pyrolysis Char : Ho = 26 MJ/kg; Ho is the upper heating value

    • C: 63%, H: 3.7%, N: 1.1%, O: 12.9%

    • Ash content of the Char: SiO2: 59%, Al2O3: 0.3%, Fe2O3: 0.7%, CaO: 7.3%, MgO: 2.1%, P2O5: 3.4%, Na2O: 0.4%, K2O: 23.8%, SO3: 3.1%

  • Pyrolysis Liquid : Ho = 7 MJ/kg (approx. 50% water phase) and 18% highly phenolic phase (Ho = 24 MJ/kg)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hornung, A. (2013). Biomass Pyrolysis . In: Kaltschmitt, M., Themelis, N.J., Bronicki, L.Y., Söder, L., Vega, L.A. (eds) Renewable Energy Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5820-3_258

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics