Skip to main content

Animal Breeding , Long-Term Challenges

  • Reference work entry
Sustainable Food Production
  • 3582 Accesses

Definition of the Subject

A major long-term challenge of animal breeding is to ensure that animal breeding is sustainable, in order to contribute to a stable long-term contribution of food for the globe. The need to address sustainability in animal breeding schemes has increased as the development in the last decades has been toward larger demands for food, fewer breeds contributing to the production of animal products, low effective population sizes despite the actual populations being large, and a decreasing number of breeding schemes providing the majority of the genetics underlying production of animal products.

The FAO report on The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture [1] indicates that the vast majority of developing countries have not been successful in sustaining genetic improvement in their livestock populations. Among the breeds considered to be in active use, 77% are located in developing countries. Animal...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Animal breeding:

Intentional breeding for certain traits, or combination of traits, by selecting animals for breeding with superior genotypes in growth rate, egg, meat, milk, or wool production, or in other desirable traits.

Animal genetic resources:

Genetic diversity, either characterized or as yet uncharacterized, that is found in economically important animals.

Animal welfare:

Animal welfare is the viewpoint that some or all animals, especially those under human care, should be treated in such a way that they do not suffer unnecessarily.

Effective population size:

Is the size of an idealized population that would behave the same as an actual population. The ideal population is one in which there is random mating and no selection. The effective size of a population is typically smaller than its actual size.

Genetic trends:

Changes in the mean breeding value of a population over time for one or more traits.

Stakeholders:

Any party that has an interest (“stake”) in a project or activity, which in the context of this chapter is animal breeding.

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. FAO (2007) The state of the world’s animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. In: Rischkowsky B, Pilling D (eds) Rome (Available at www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1250e/a1250e00.htm)

  2. FAO (2010) Breeding strategies for sustainable management of animal genetic resources: FAO animal production and health guidelines, vol 3. FAO, Rome, 160 pp

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim ES, Kirkpatrick BW (2009) Linkage disequilibrium in the North American Holstein population. Anim Genet 40:279–288. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01831.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sørensen AC, Sørensen MK, Berg P (2005) Inbreeding in Danish dairy cattle breeds. J Dairy Sci 88:1865–1872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hastedt H (2000) Beats, humans and the etics of animal breeding. Arch Tierz 43:218–225

    Google Scholar 

  6. Larrere R (2003) The issue of modern breeding a social request, consumer request or responsible inquiries? Prod Anim 16:329–332

    Google Scholar 

  7. Olsson IAS, Gamborg C, Sandoe P (2006) Taking ethics into account in farm animal breeding What can the breeding companies achieve? J Agric Environ Ethics 19:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Neeteson-van Nieuwenhouven A, Merks J, Bagnato A, Liinamo A (2006) Sustainable transparent animal breeding and reproduction. Livest Prod Sci 103(3):282–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment. Retrieved on: 2010-06-30

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gamborg C, Sandoe P (2005) Sustainability in farm animal breeding a review. Livest Prod Sci 92:221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Woolliams J, Berg P, Mäki-Tanila A, Meuwissen T, Fimland E (2005) Sustainable management of animal genetic ressources. Nordic Gene Bank Farm Animals, Nordisk Genbank Husdyr. ISBN 92-893-1089-8

    Google Scholar 

  12. CODE-EFABAR (2010). http://www.effab.org/CODEEFABAR.aspx. Assessed 30-6-2010

  13. Shuster DE, Kehrli ME, Ackermann MR, Gilbert RO (1992) Identification and prevalence of a genetic defect that causes leukocyte adhesion deficiency in Holstein cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:9225–9229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Agerholm JS, Bendixen C, Andersen O, Arnbjerg J (2001) Complex vertebral malformation in Holstein calves. J Vet Diagn Invest 13:283–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carden AE, Hill WG, Webb AJ (1983) The inheritance of halothane susceptibility in pigs. Genet Sel Evol 15:65–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Star L, Ellen E, Uitdehaag K, Brom FWA (2007) A plea to implement robustness into a breeding goal: poultry as an example. J Agric Environ Ethics 21:109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Waaij EH (2004) A resource allocation model describing consequences of artificial selection under metabolic stress. J Anim Sci 82:973–981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rauw WM, Luiting P, Beilharz RG, Verstegen MWA, Vangen O (1999) Selection for litter size and its consequences for the allocation of feed ressources a concept and its implications illustarted by mice selection experiments. Livest Prod Sci 60:329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheema MA, Qureshi MA, Havenstein GB (2005) A comparison of the immune response of a 2001 commercial broiler with a 1957 randombred broiler strain when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poult Sci 82:1519–1529

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bijma P (2000) Long-term genetic contributions. Prediction of rates of inbreeding and genetic gain in selected populations. PhD thesis. ISBN 90-5808-241-5

    Google Scholar 

  21. Olesen I, Groen AF, Gjerde B (2000) Definition of animal breeding goals for sustainable production systems. J Anim Sci 78:570–582

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819–1829

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kolmodin R, Bijma P (2004) Response to mass selection when the genotype by environment interaction is modeled as a linear reaction norm. Genet Sel Evol 36:435–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Flock DK, Laughlin KF, Bentley J (2005) Minimizing losses in poultry breeding and production: how breeding companies contribute to poultry welfare. Worlds Poult Sci J 61:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lawrence AB, Conington J, Simm G (2004) Breeding and animal welfare: practical and theoretical advantages of multi-trait selection. Anim Welfare 13:S191–S196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jensen P, Buitenhuis B, Kjaer J, Zanella A, Mormede P, Pizzari T (2008) Genetics and genomics of animal behaviour and welfare – Challenges and possibilities. Appl Anim Behav Sci 113:383–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kanis E, van den Belt H, Groen AF, Schakel J, de Greef KH (2004) Breeding for improved welfare in pigs: a conceptual framework and it suse in practise. Anim Sci 78:315–329

    Google Scholar 

  28. Clark JAM, Potter M, Harding E (2006) The welfare implications of animal breeding and breeding technologies in commercial agriculture. Livest Sci 103:270–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mark T, Sandøe P (2010) Genomic dairy cattle breeding: risks and opportunities for cow welfare. Anim Welfare 19(1):113–121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Meuwissen THE (1997) Maximising the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J Anim Sci 75:934–940

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Books and Reviews

  • FAO (2010) Breeding strategies for sustainable management of animal genetic resources: FAO animal production and health guidelines, vol 3. FAO, Rome, 160 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peer Berg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Berg, P. (2013). Animal Breeding , Long-Term Challenges . In: Christou, P., Savin, R., Costa-Pierce, B.A., Misztal, I., Whitelaw, C.B.A. (eds) Sustainable Food Production. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_345

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics