Overview
Cross-national inquiry can make several distinctive contributions to the understanding of criminal violence. One, it permits an assessment of variability in levels and patterns of violent crime. In his classic discussion of the “normality of crime,” Durkheim (1964:66) argued that crime is “closely connected with the conditions of all social life,” leading him to conclude that a society without crime is inconceivable. The same may very well hold true for violent crime in contemporary nations. Coercive action has intrinsic utility for obtaining compliance from others, and thus a certain degree of violence may be an inevitable feature of complex forms of social organization. Nevertheless, cross-national research elucidates the range of possibilities for minimizing levels of criminal violence.
Two, cross-national inquiry is indispensable for establishing the generality of theories of violence and the need for any scope conditions (Kohn 1987). As Lilly et al. (1989:11) observe,...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Recommended Reading and References
Archer D, Gartner R (1984) Violence and crime in cross-national perspective. Yale University Press, New Haven
Barak G (2001) Crime and crime control in an age of globlization: a theoretical discussion. Crit Criminol 10:57–72
Castells M (1997) The power of identity. Blackwell, Oxford, UK
Currie E (1991) Crime in the market society: from bad to worse in the ineties. Dissent (Spring):254–259
Durkheim E (1964 [1895]) The rules of sociological method. Free Press, New York
Eisner M (1995) The effects of economic structures and phases of development on crime. Criminol Res 32:17–43
Eisner M, Malti T, Ribeaud D (2012) Large-scale criminological field experiments. In: Gadd D, Karstedt S, Messner SF (eds) The Sage handbook of criminological research methods. Sage, London, pp 410–424
Elias N (1978) The civilizing process: the history of manners (trans: Jephcott E). Urizen Books, New York
Ellsberg MC, Heise L (2005) Researching violence against women: a practical guide for researchers and activists. World Health Organization, Washington, DC
Ember CR, Ember M (1995) Issues in cross-cultural studies of interpersonal violence. In: Barry Ruback R, Weiner NA (eds) Interpersonal violent behaviors: social and cultural aspects. Springer, New York, pp 25–42
Fiala R, LaFree G (1988) Cross-national determinants of child homicide. Am Sociol Rev 53:432–445
García-Moreno G-M, Jansen HAFM, Watts C, Ellsberg MC, Heise L (2005) WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. World Health Organization, Geneva
Gartner R (1990) The victims of homicide: a temporal and cross-national comparison. Am Sociol Rev 55:92–106
Gartner R (1995) Methodological issues in cross-cultural large-survey research on violence. In: Barry Ruback R, Neil Alan W (eds) Interpersonal violent behaviors: social and cultural aspects. Springer, New York, pp 7–24
Gatti U, Haymoz S, Schadee HMA (2011) Deviant youth groups in 30 countries: results from the second international self-report delinquency study. Int Crim Justice Rev 21:208–224
Groves WB, McCleary R, Newman GR (1985) Religion, modernization, and world crime. Comp Soc Res 8:59–78
Heiland H-G, Shelley L (1991) Civilization, modernization and the development of crime and control. In: Heiland H-G, Shelley LI, Katoh K (eds), Crime and control in comparative perspective. Walter de Gruyter, New York, pp 1–19
Jacobs D, Richardson AM (2008) Economic inequality and homicide in the developed nations from 1975 to 1995. Homicide Stud 12:28–45
Johnson J, Ollus N, Nevala S (2008) Violence against women: an international perspective. Springer, New York
Junger-Tas J, Terlouw G-J, Kein M (eds) (1994) Delinquent behavior of young people in the western world – first results of an international self-report delinquency study. Kugler Publications, Amsterdam
Karstedt S (1999) The moral strength of weak ties: a cross-cultural analysis of individualism and violence. In: Fifty-first annual meeting of the American society of criminology, Toronto, 17–20 Nov 1999
Kaya Y, Cook KJ (2010) A cross-national analysis of physical intimate partner violence against women. Int J Comp Sociol 51:423–444
Killias M (1992) Gun ownership, suicide, and homicide: an international perspective. In: Alvazzi del Frate A, Zvekic U, van Dijk J (eds) Understanding crime: experiences of crime and crime control. UNICRI, Rome, pp 289–302
Kohn ML (1987) Cross-national research as an analytic strategy – American Sociological Association, 1987 presidential address. Am Sociol Rev 52(December):713–731
Krahn H, Hartnagel TF, Gartrell JW (1986) Income inequality and homicide rates: cross-national data and criminological theories. Criminology 24:269–295.
LaFree G (1999) A summary and review of cross-national comparative studies of homicide. In: Dwayne Smith M, Zahn MA (eds) Homicide: a sourcebook of social research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 125–145
LaFree G, Kick EL (1986) Cross-national effects of developmental, distributional, and demographic variables on crime: a review and analysis. Int Ann Criminol 24:213–235
Landau SF, Pfeffermann D (1988) A time series analysis of violent crime and its relation to prolonged states of warfare: the Israeli case. Criminology 26:489–504
Lilly JR, Cullen FT, Ball RA (1989) Criminological theory: context and consequences. Sage, Newbury Park
Messner SF (1982) Societal development, social equality, and homicide: a cross-national test of a Durkheimian model. Social Forces 61:225–240
Messner SF (2000) Market dominance, crime, and globalization. In: Karstedt S, Bussman K-D (eds) Social dynamics of crime and control: new theories for a world in transition. Hart Publishing, Oxford
Messner SF (2003) Understanding cross-national variation in criminal violence. In: Heitmeyer W, Hagan J (eds) International handbook of violence research. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 701–716
Messner SF, Rosenfeld R (1997) Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: a cross-national application of institutional-anomie theory. Soc Forces 75:1393–1416
Messner SF, Raffalovich LE, Sutton GM (2010) Poverty, infant mortality, and homicide rates in cross-national perspective: assessments of criterion and construct validity. Criminology 48:801–830
Neapolitan JL (1997) Cross-national crime: a research review and sourcebook. Greenwood Press, Westport
Neuman WL, Berger RJ (1988) Competing perspectives on cross-national crime: an evaluation of theory and evidence. Sociol Q 29:281–313
Neumayer E (2003) Good policy can lower violent crime: evidence from fixed effects estimation in a cross-national panel of homicide rates, 1980–97. J Peace Res 40:619–640
Pampel FC, Gartner R (1995) Age structure, socio-political institutions, and national homicide rates. Eur Sociol Rev 11:243–260
Pratt TC, Godsey TW (2003) Social support, inequality, and homicide: a cross-national test of an integrated theoretical model. Criminology 41:611–643
Pridemore WA (2008) A methodological addition to the cross-national empirical literature on social structure and homicide: a first test of the poverty-homicide thesis. Criminology 46:133–154
Pridemore WA (2011) Poverty matters: a reassessment of the inequality-homicide relationship in cross-national studies. Br J Criminol 51:739–772
Savolainen J (2000) Inequality, welfare state, and homicide: further support for the institutional anomie theory. Criminology 38:1021–1042
Shelley LI (1981) Crime and modernization: the impact of industrialization and urbanization on crime. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale
Shelley LI (1986) Crime and modernization reexamined. Annales Internationales de Criminologie 24:7–21
Short JF Jr (1985) The level of explanation problem in criminology. In: Meier RM (ed) Theoretical methods in criminology. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 51–72
Smith E, Kwong Wong S (1989) Durkheim, individualism and homicide rates re-examined. Sociol Spectr 9:269–283
Stein RE (2010) The utility of country structure: a cross-national multilevel analysis of property and violent victimization. Int Crim Justice Rev 20:35–55
Stein RE (2011) The contextual variation of routine activities: a comparitive analysis of assault victimization. Int J Hum Soc Sci 1:11–24
Straus S (2006) Beyond Rwanda: new directions in comparative genocide research. Invited Presentation, Department of Political Science, Yale University
Teeple G (1995) Globalization and the decline of social reform. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands
van Dijk JJM, Kesteren JN, Smit P (2008) Criminal victimisation in international perspective: key findings from the 2004-2005 ICVS and EU ICS. Boom Legal Publishers, The Hague
Walker J (1999) Firearm abuse and regulation. In: Newman G (ed) Global report on crime and justice. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 151–169
Weiner NA, Barry Ruback R (1995) Inquiry through a comparative lens: unraveling the social and cultural aspects of interpersonal violent behaviors. In: Barry Ruback R, Weiner NA (eds) Interpersonal violent behaviors: social and cultural aspects. Springer, New York, pp 171–182
Wilkinson R (2004) Why is violence more common where inequality is greater? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1036:1–12
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Messner, S.F., Zimmerman, G.M. (2014). Understanding Cross-National Variation. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_675
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_675
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law