Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

Hormones, the Brain, and Criminality

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_59

Overview

“Is biology really relevant to criminology? After all, criminal behavior is learned, right? People aren’t just born criminals; that’s ridiculous.” Critics of the biosocial perspective still use this sort of reasoning to raise doubts about the role of biology in crime causation. However, such thinking overlooks evidence that many personality traits and even human interests and preferences are genetically influenced to a substantial degree (Bouchard and McGue 2003; Kreek et al. 2005; Schermer and Vernon 2008). There is also considerable evidence that all human learning boils down to neurochemical processes that vary from one individual to another (Lawson 2003). Consequently, even though criminality is learned, biology still affects how we learn. To set the stage for examining this line of reasoning further, this entry will describe the role of a class of biochemicals called hormonesin learning criminal behavior. But before doing so, a little background on biosocial criminology...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Archer J (1994) Testosterone and aggression. In: Hillbrand M, Pallone NJ (eds) The psychobiology of aggression: engines, measurements, control. Hawthorn, New York, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  2. Bartels M, de Geus EJC, Kirschbaum C, Sluyter F, Boomsma DI (2003) Heritability of daytime cortisol levels in children. Behav Genet 33:421–433Google Scholar
  3. Birger M, Swartz M, Cohen D, Alesh Y, Grishpan C, Kotelr M (2003) Aggression: the testosterone-serotonin link. Isr Med Assoc J 5:653–658Google Scholar
  4. Booth A, Kivlighan KT, Mazur A, Granger DA (2006) Testosterone and social behavior. Soc Forces 85:167–191Google Scholar
  5. Bouchard TJ, McGue M (2003) Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. J Neurobiol 54:4–45Google Scholar
  6. Cooper JA, Walsh A, Ellis L (2010) Is criminology moving toward a paradigm shift? Evidence from a survey of the American Society of Criminology. J Crim Justice Educ 21:332–347Google Scholar
  7. Ellis L (2005) Theoretically explaining biological correlates of criminal behavior. Eur J Criminol 2:287–315Google Scholar
  8. Ellis L (2008) Reducing crime evolutionarily. In: Duntley JD, Shackelford TK (eds) Evolutionary forensic psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 249–267Google Scholar
  9. Ellis L, Das S, Buker H (2008) Androgen-promoted physiological traits and criminality: a test of the evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory. Personal Individ Differ 44:701–711Google Scholar
  10. Ellis L, Beaver K, Wright J (2009) Handbook of crime correlates. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Gordis EB, Granger DA, Susman EJ, Trickett PK (2006) Asymmetry between salivary cortisol and [alpha]-amylase reactivity to stress: relation to aggressive behavior in adolescents. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31:976–987Google Scholar
  12. Kreek MJ, Nielsen DA, Butelman ER, LaForge KS (2005) Genetic influences on impulsivity, risk taking, stress responsivity and vulnerability to drug abuse and addiction. Nat Neurosci 8:1450–1457Google Scholar
  13. Lawson AE (2003) The neurological basis of learning, development, and discovery: implications for science and mathematics instruction, vol 18. Springer, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. MacGillivray L (1997) California’s mandatory chemical castration program for repeat sex offenders: an analysis of the legislation under German and American constitutional law. Suffolk Transnatl Law Rev 21:143–178Google Scholar
  15. McDermott R, Johnson D, Cowden J, Rosen S (2007) Testosterone and aggression in a simulated crisis game. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 614:15–33Google Scholar
  16. Mitchell WJ, Richard A (1998) Taboo until today? The coverage of biological arguments in criminology textbooks, 1961 to 1970 and 1987 to 1996. J Crim Justice 26:1–19Google Scholar
  17. Moffitt TE (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev 100:674–701Google Scholar
  18. Pajer K, Gardner W, Rubin RT, Perel J, Neal S (2001) Decreased cortisol levels in adolescent girls with conduct disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58:297–302Google Scholar
  19. Romeo RD, Schulz KM, Nelson AL, Menard TA, Sisk CL (2003) Testosterone, puberty, and the pattern of male aggression in Syrian hamsters. Dev Psychobiol 43:102–108Google Scholar
  20. Rowe DC (1996) An adaptive strategy theory of crime and delinquency. In: Hawkins JD (ed) Delinquency and crime: current theories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 268–314Google Scholar
  21. Schermer JA, Vernon PA (2008) A behavior genetic analysis of vocational interests using a modified version of the Jackson Vocational Interest Survey. Personal Individ Differ 45:103–109Google Scholar
  22. Sisk CL, Zehr JL (2005) Pubertal hormones organize the adolescent brain and behavior. Front Neuroendocrinol 26:163–174Google Scholar
  23. Terburg D, Morgan B, van Honk J (2009) The testosterone-cortisol ratio: a hormonal marker for proneness to social aggression. Int J Law Psychiatry 32:216–223Google Scholar
  24. van Bokhoven I, van Goozen SHM, van Engeland H, Schaal B, Arseneault L, Séguin JR et al (2006) Salivary testosterone and aggression, delinquency, and social dominance in a population-based longitudinal study of adolescent males. Horm Behav 50:118–125Google Scholar
  25. Walsh A, Beaver K (eds) (2008) Biosocial criminology: new directions in theory and research. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  26. Wüst S, Federenko I, Hellhammer DH, Kirschbaum C (2000) Genetic factors, perceived chronic stress, and the free cortisol response to awakening. Psychoneuroendocrinology 25:707–720Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anthropology and SociologyUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia