Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

High Policing

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_460

Overview

What is “high policing?” The term does not refer to the euphoria police may feel after an adrenalin generating challenge is met, nor does it refer to policing while high, although both might accompany the activities falling within the concept’s broad meaning. In its original meaning, it referred to the use of political intelligence to preserve the power of the ruler, in particular as this involved stealth, spying, espionage, and intrigue. Yet, like barnacles that become attached to a ship, over time the concept has evolved and layers of meaning have been added. The original ship is long gone, but parts of it endure in new forms and settings throughout society.

High policing can refer to the location of an agency such as those attached to the highest levels of governance, to an ethos involving intelligence collection and prevention of threats to what is now called national security, and to methodsof information discovery and subsequent action swathed in secrecy and deception,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Aristotle, Politics (book 5). http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.html. Accessed 01 July 2012
  2. Bamford J (2008) The shadow factory; the ultra-secret NSA from 9/11 to the eavesdropping on America. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigo D (2006) Globalized (in)security: the field and the Ban-Opticon. In: Bigo D, Tsoukala A (eds) Illiberal practices of liberal regimes: the (in)security games. L’Harmattan, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Brodeur J (1983) High policing and low policing: remarks about the policing of political activities. Soc Probl 30:507–520Google Scholar
  5. Brodeur J (2011) The police web. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunet JP (1990) La Police de l’Ombre. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapman B (1970) Police state. Pall Mall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Chesterman S (2011) One nation under surveillance: a new social contract to defend freedom without sacrificing liberty. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen S (1985) Visions of social control. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham D (2005) There’s something happening here: the new left, the Klan, and FBI counterintelligence. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Donner F (1990) Protectors of privilege. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  12. Earl J (2011) Political repression: iron fists, velvet gloves, and diffuse control. Annu Rev Sociol 37:261–284Google Scholar
  13. Ericson R, Haggerty K (1997) Policing the risk society. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Foucault M (1977) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Pantheon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenberg I (2010) The dangers of dissent: the FBI and civil liberties since 1965. Lexington Books, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoogenboom R (2010) The governance of policing and security ironies, myths and paradoxes. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes EC (1962) Good people and dirty work. Soc Probl 10(1):3–11Google Scholar
  18. Klockars C (1980) The dirty Harry problem. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 452:33–48Google Scholar
  19. Loew D (2011) The lack of discretion in high policing. Polic Soc 21:233–247Google Scholar
  20. Los M, Zybertowicz A (2000) Privatizing the police state. MacMillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  21. Lubbers E (2012) Secret manoeuvres in the dark. Pluto Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Manning P (2012) Jean-Paul Brodeur on high and low policing. Nouvelle Rev Int Criminol 11Google Scholar
  23. Marx GT (1974) Thoughts on a neglected category of social movement participant: the agent provocateur and the informant. Am J Sociol 80:415–421Google Scholar
  24. Marx GT (1979) External efforts to damage or facilitate social movements: some patterns, explanations, outcomes, and complications. In: Zald M, McCarthy J (eds) The dynamics of social movements resource mobilization, social control and tactics. Winthrop, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Nisbet R (1977) The twilight of authority. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Priest D, Arkin W (2011) Top secret America. Little Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  27. Ross J (2004) Impediments to transnational cooperation in undercover policing: a comparative study of the United States and Italy. Am J Comp Law 52:569–624Google Scholar
  28. Shils E (1975) Center and periphery. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  29. Silver A (1967) The demand for order in civil society: a review of some themes in the history of urban crime, police and riot. In: Bordua DJ (ed) The police. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Starr A, Fernandez L, Scholl C (2011) Shutting down the streets: political violence in the global era. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. The 9/11 Commission Report (2004) USGPO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA