Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

History of the Dutch Crime Victimization Survey(s)

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_450

Overview

The series of Crime Victim Surveys started in the early 1970s in the Netherlands. Changing policy needs, stakeholders, and available interview modes have repeatedly led to important adjustments in the methodology, compromising comparisons of results over the years. Nevertheless, interesting trends spanning four decades can be constructed for some crime types. In this entry, an overview is given of the eight subsequent versions of the Dutch Victim Survey and their main characteristics. Next, longtime trends are presented for victimizations by burglary, bicycle theft, violent crime, and total crime. Trends in feelings of unsafety are shown from the early 1990s onwards.

Introduction

Already in the early 1970s, the need for a survey to measure crime by asking the general population about their experiences instead of relying on police records only was felt in the Netherlands. In 1973, the Ministry of Justice funded a pilot study by Jan Fiselier who experimented with different...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Buelens B, Van der Laan J, Schouten B, den Brakel V, Burger J, Klausch T (2012) Disentangling mode-specific selection and measurement bias in social surveys, discussion paper. Statistics Netherlands, HeerlenGoogle Scholar
  2. van Dijk JJM, Steinmetz CHD (1980) The RDC victim surveys, 1974–1979. Ministry of Justice, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  3. van Dijk JJM(2009) Approximating the truth about crime; comparing crime data based on population surveys with police figures of recorded crimes; synthetic report, CRIMPREV, Groupe Europeen de recherches sur les Normativites (GERN/CNRS)Google Scholar
  4. van Dijk JJM, Mayhew P, Van Kesteren J, Aebi M, Linde A (2010) Final report on the study on crime victimisation (commissioned by Eurostat). INTERVICT, University of Tilburg, TilburgGoogle Scholar
  5. Fiselier JPS (1978) Slachtoffers van Delicten; een onderzoek naar verborgen criminaliteit. Ars Aequi, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Goudriaan H, Wittebrood K, Nieuwbeerta P (2006) Neighbourhood characteristics and reporting crime. Effects of social cohesion, confidence in police effectiveness, and socio-economic disadvantage. Br J Criminol 46:719–742Google Scholar
  7. Vollaard B, Van Ours J (2011) Does regulation of built-in security reduce crime? Evidence from a natural experiment. Econ J 121(May):485–504Google Scholar
  8. Wilsem van J (2003) Crime and context: the Impact of individual, neighborhood, city and country characteristics on victimization. Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, NijmegenGoogle Scholar
  9. Wittebrood K (2008) Comparing crime data in The Netherlands, paper CRIMPREV WP 7, GERN/CNRSGoogle Scholar
  10. Wittebrood K, Junger K (2002) Trends in violent crime: a comparison between police statistics and victimization surveys. Soc Indic Res 2(59):153–173Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministry of Safety and Justice, Research and Documentation CentreThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Human Security and Safety International Victimology InstituteTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands