Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

History of Criminal Investigation

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_421

Overview

During the course of history, police organizations have responded to a variety of external forces that have caused changes in how organizations perform the investigative function and the methods used to investigate criminal occurrences. This entry describes the evolution of the criminal investigation function in the United States. The predecessors of modern detectives (informers and parliamentary reward, thief-takers, thief-makers) are discussed, the tactics and technologies of early investigations in the USA are examined, the development and importance of private detectives and state and federal law enforcement agencies are discussed, and changes in the investigative function through the political, reform, and community problem-solving eras of policing are chronicled.

The purpose of this entry is to provide an overview of the history of the criminal investigation function in American law enforcement. An understanding of history, the history of criminal investigations in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Ball LD (1978) The United States Marshals of New Mexico and Arizona Territories. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp 1846–1912Google Scholar
  2. Baskin D, Sommers I (2010) The influence of forensic evidence on the case outcome of homicide incidents. J Crim Justice 38:1141–1149Google Scholar
  3. Brandl SG (2003) Back to the future: the implications of September 11, 2001 on law enforcement practice and policy. Ohio State J Crim Law 1:133–154Google Scholar
  4. Brandl SG, Frank J (1994) The relationship between evidence, detective effort, and the disposition of burglary and robbery investigations. Am J Police 13:149–168Google Scholar
  5. Conti PM (1977) The Pennsylvania State Police: a history of service to the commonwealth, 1905 to present. Stackpole, HarrisburgGoogle Scholar
  6. Dabney D (2010) Observations regarding key operational realities in a compstat model of policing. Justice Q 27:28–51Google Scholar
  7. Dilworth DC (1977) Identification wanted: development of the American criminal identification system 1893–1943. International Association of Chiefs of Police, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
  8. Eck JE (1983) Solving crimes: the investigation of burglary and robbery. Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Federal Bureau of Investigation (1990) FBI: facts and history. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Federal Bureau of Investigation (1999) Your FBI. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldstein H (1987) Toward community oriented policing: potential, basic requirements, and threshold questions. Crime Delinq 33:6–30Google Scholar
  12. Greenwood PW, Chaiken JM, Petersilia J (1977) The criminal investigation process. D.C. Heath, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. Haller MH (1976) Historical roots of police behavior: Chicago, 1890–1925. Law Soc Rev 10:303–323Google Scholar
  14. Kelling GL, Moore MH (1988) The evolving strategy of policing, vol 4, Perspectives on policing. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  15. Kelling GL, Pate T, Diekman D, Brown CE (1974) The Kansas City preventive patrol experiment. Police Foundation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Kelly JF, Wearne P (1998) Tainting evidence: inside the scandals at the FBI crime lab. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Klockars CG (1985) The idea of the police. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuykendall J (1986) The municipal police detective: an historical analysis. Criminology 24:175–200Google Scholar
  19. Lane R (1967) Policing the city: Boston 1822–1885. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Lavine E (1930) The third degree: a detailed and appalling expose of police brutality. Garden City, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Muller G (1889) Alphonse Bertillon’s instructions for taking descriptions for the identification of criminals. American Bertillon Prison Bureau, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  22. Murray RK (1955) Red scare. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Rhodes HTF (1968) Alphonse Bertillon: father of scientific detection. Greenwood Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenbaum D (1994) The challenge of community policing: testing the promise. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  25. Skolnick JH, Bayley DH (1988) Theme and variation in community policing. In: Tonry M, Morris N (eds) Crime and justice. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Skolnick JH, Fyfe JJ (1993) Above the law: police and the excessive use of force. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson JQ, Kelling GL (1982) Broken windows: the police and neighborhood safety. Atl Mon 249:29–38Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA