Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

Measurement of Self-Control

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_359

Overview

Gottfredson and Hirschi’s concept of self-control is one criminological construct that has sparked a large amount of theoretical and empirical debate among criminologists. The interest in measuring self-control and understanding the psychometric properties of self-control measures is perhaps due to the explanatory power that Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) attribute to self-control and the theoretical propositions they make regarding this construct. It is therefore surprising that little effort has been made to systematically examine and compile the state of criminological research on the measurement of self-control. This entry is designed to fill this void by providing a review of several issues related to the measurement of self-control and empirical studies on self-control measurement.

This review will accomplish several tasks. First, conceptual and operational definitions of self-control will be discussed. In doing so, this entry highlights the disagreements on whether the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Akers RJ (1991) Self-control as a general theory of crime. J Quant Criminol 7:201–211Google Scholar
  2. Arneklev BJ, Grasmick HG, Bursik RJ Jr, (1999) Evaluating the dimensionality and invariance of “low self- control.” J Quant Criminol 15:307–331Google Scholar
  3. Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural equation models. Psychol Bull 107:238–246Google Scholar
  4. Bond TG, Fox CM (2001) Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  5. Delisi M, Hochstetler A, Murphy DS (2003) Self-control behind bars: a validation study of the Grasmick et al. scale. J Quarterly 20:241–263Google Scholar
  6. DeVellis RF (1991) Scale development. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans TD, Cullen FT, Burton VE Jr, Dunaway RG, Benson ML (1997) The social consequences of self-control theory. Criminology 35(3):475–501Google Scholar
  8. Gibbs JJ, Giever D (1995) Self-control and its manifestations among university students: an empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. JQ 12:231–255Google Scholar
  9. Gibbs JJ, Giever D, Martin JS (1998) Parental management and self-control: an empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. J Res Crime Delinq 35:40–70Google Scholar
  10. Gibson CL, Sullivan C, Jones S, Piquero A (2010a) Does it take a assessing neighborhood effects on self-control. J Res Crime Delinq 47:31–62Google Scholar
  11. Gibson CL, Ward JT, Wright JP, Beaver KM, DeLisi M (2010b) Where does gender fit in the measurement of self-control. Criminal Justice Behav 36:883–903Google Scholar
  12. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Grasmick HG, Tittle CR, Bursik RJ, Arneklev BJ (1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. J Res Crime Delinq 30:5–29Google Scholar
  14. Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Jane Rogers H (1991) Fundamentals of item response theory. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirschi T (2004) Self-control and crime. In: Baumiester RF, Vohs KD (eds) Handbook on self-regulation: research, theory, and application. Guilford, New York, pp 53–552Google Scholar
  16. Hirschi T, Gottfredson MR (1993) Commentary: testing the general theory of crime. J Res Crime Delinq 30:47–54Google Scholar
  17. Hirschi T, Gottfredson MR (1994) The generality of deviance. In: Hirschi T, Gottfredson MR (eds) The generality of deviance. Transaction Publishers, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  18. Keane C, Maxim PS, Teevan JJ (1993) Drinking and driving, self-control, and gender: testing the general theory of crime. J Res Crime and Delinq 30:30–46Google Scholar
  19. Longshore D, Turner S, Stein JA (1996) Self-control in a criminal sample: an examination of construct validity. Criminology 34:209–228Google Scholar
  20. Marcus B (2004) Self-control in the general theory of crime: theoretical implications of a measurement problem. Theor Criminol 8:33–35Google Scholar
  21. Nagin DS, Paternoster R (1993) Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law and Soc Rev 27:467–496Google Scholar
  22. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Paternoster R, Brame R (1998) The structural similarity of processes generating criminal and analogous behavior. Criminology 36:633–670Google Scholar
  24. Piquero AR, Tibbetts S (1996) Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self–control and situational factors in offender’s decision making. Justice Quart 13:481–510Google Scholar
  25. Piquero AR, Rosay AB (1998) The reliability and validity of Grasmick et al.’s self-control scale: a comment on Longshore et al. Criminology 36:157–173Google Scholar
  26. Piquero AR, MacIntosh R, Hickman M (2000) Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick et al.’s self-control scale. Criminology 38:897–929Google Scholar
  27. Pratt TC, Cullen FT (2000) The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta–analysis. Criminology 38:931–964Google Scholar
  28. Stylianou S (2002) Relationship between element and manifestations of low self-control in a general theory of crime: two comments and a test. Deviant Behav 23:531–557Google Scholar
  29. Tittle CR, Ward DA, Grasmick HG (2003) Self-control and crime/deviance: cognitive vs. behavioral measures. J Quantitative Criminol 19:333–365Google Scholar
  30. Trochim WMK (2001) The research methods knowledge base. Atomic Dog Publishing, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  31. Vazsonyi AT, Pickering LE, Junger M, Hessing D (2001) An empirical test of a general theory of crime: a four-nation comparative study of self-control and the prediction of deviance. J Res Crime Delinq 38:91–131Google Scholar
  32. Ward JT, Gibson CL, Boman J, Leite WL (2010) Is the general theory of crime really stronger than the evidence suggests? Assessing the validity of the retrospective behavioral self-control scale. Criminal Justice Behav 37:336–357Google Scholar
  33. Wright BD, Masters GN (1982) Rating scale analysis. MESA Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  34. Zager MA (1994) Gender and crime. In: Hirschi T, Gottfredson MR (eds) The generality of deviance. Transaction Publishers, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Criminology & LawUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA