Skip to main content

Actualizing Risk-Need-Responsivity

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 4,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 4,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading and References

  • Andrews DA, Bonta J (2006) The psychology of criminal conduct, 5th edn. Anderson, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DA, Bonta J (2010) The psychology of criminal conduct, 5th edn. Anderson, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DA, Bonta J, Wormith JS (2006) The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime Delinq 52(1):7–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin J (2006) How much risk can we take? The misuse of risk assessment in corrections. Fed Probat 70(2):58–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin J (2009) The limits of prison based treatment. Vict Offenders 4:311–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta J, Andrews DA (2007) Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and treatment (user report 2007–06). Public Safety Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgon G, Armstrong B (2005) Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a “real world” prison setting. Crim Justice Behav 32(1):3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne J (2009) Maximum impact: targeting supervision on higher-risk people, places and times. Public safety performance project. The PEW Center on the States

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann PD, Taxman FS, Henderson CE (2007) Evidence-based treatment practices for drug-involved adults in the criminal justice system. J Subst Abus Treat 32(3):267–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner BM, Berg M (2011) Examining the sources of variation in risk for recidivism. Justice Q 28(1):146–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Latessa EJ, Lovins B (2010) The role of offender risk assessment: a policy maker guide. Vict Offender 5(3):203

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey MW, Cullen FT (2007) The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: a review of systematic reviews. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 3:297–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman FS, Belenko S (2012) Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections and addiction treatment. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman FS, Cropsey KL, Young D, Wexler H (2007a) Screening, assessment, and referral practices in adult correctional settings: a national perspective. Crim Justice Behav 34(9):1216–1234

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman FS, Perdoni M, Harrison LD (2007b) Drug treatment services for adult offenders: the state of the state. J Subst Abus Treat 32:239–254

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faye S. Taxman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Taxman, F.S., Caudy, M., Maass, S. (2014). Actualizing Risk-Need-Responsivity. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_349

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_349

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics