Skip to main content

Victims’ Rights in the Criminal Justice System

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

Overview

The concept of victims’ rights has come to bear considerable influence on the formation of criminal justice policy on both the domestic and international platforms. While commentators have long accepted the desirability of rights for accused persons, it is only in more recent times that a discourse concerning the rights of victims has emerged. Prior to exploring the evolution and extent of such rights, it is worth noting at the outset that the tendency of policymakers and politicians to adopt language couched in the terminology of victims rights’ often departs from the notion of a legal right, in the sense that it can be enforced through the justice system. In other words, while certain benefits or dispensations may be framed as rights on paper, they frequently lack any enforcement mechanism and may not be considered binding on courts or other public authorities.

History and Development

There are diverse and varied accounts which document the ascendancy of victims’ rights...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 4,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 4,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading and References

  • Ashworth A (2000) Victims’ rights, defendants’ rights and criminal procedure. In: Crawford A, Goodey J (eds) Integrating a victim perspective within criminal justice. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Beloof D (1999) The third model of criminal process: the victim impact model. Utah Law Rev 2:289–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth T, Carrington K (2007) A comparative analysis of victim policies across the Anglo speaking world. In: Walklate S (ed) Handbook of victims and victimology. Willan, Cullompton

    Google Scholar 

  • Brienen M, Hoegen H (2000) Victims of crime in 22 European criminal justice systems: the implementation of recommendation (85) 11 of the council of Europe on the position of the victim in the framework of criminal law and procedure. Wolf Legal Productions, Niemegen

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavadino M, Dignan J (1997) Reparation, retribution and rights. Int Rev Victimol 4:233–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie N (1977) Conflicts as property. Br J Criminol 17:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen R (2006) The rise of the victim – a path to punitiveness? Ir Crim Law J 16:10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Dignan J (2005) Understanding victims and restorative justice. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • Doak J (2008) Victims rights, human rights and criminal justice: reconceiving the role of third parties. Hart, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Doak J, Taylor L (2012) EU tools for the protection of victims of serious and organised crime. In: Ruggieri S (ed) The protection of fundamental rights in criminal proceedings. Springer, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison L (2001) The adversarial process and the vulnerable witness. Hart, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Erez E, Roeger L (1995) The effect of victim impact statements on sentencing patterns and outcomes: the Australian experience. J Crim Justice 23:363–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Freckleton I (2004) Compensation for crime victims. In: Kaptein H, Malsch M (eds) Crime, victims and justice: essays on principles and practice. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland D (2001) The culture of control: crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis G (1990) Crime victims – practices and prospects. In: Lurigio A, Skogan WG, Davis RC (eds) Victims of crime: problems, policies, programs. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall M (2009) Victims of crime: policy and practice in criminal justice. Willan, Cullompton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall M (2010) Victims and policymaking: a comparative perspective. Willan, Cullompton

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JD (2003) Justice for all: putting victims at the heart of criminal justice? J Law Soc 30:309–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmen A (1992) Who’s against victims’ rights? St John’s J Leg Comment 8:157–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearon T, Godrey B (2007) Setting the scene: a question of history. In: Walklate S (ed) Handbook of victims and victimology. Willan, Cullompton

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug F (2004) Human rights and victims. In: Cape E (ed) Reconcilable rights? Analysing the tension between victims and defendants. Legal Action Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffman L (1996) Crime surveys and victims of crime. University of Wales Press, Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  • Manikis M (2011) Navigating through an obstacle course: the complaints mechanism for victims of crime in England and Wales. Criminol Crim Justice 12:149–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawby R, Walklate S (1994) Critical victimology: international perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Miers D (2000) Taking the law into their own hands: victims as offenders. In: Crawford A, Goodey J (eds) Integrating a victim perspective within criminal justice. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach K (1999) Due process and victims’ rights: the new law and politics of criminal justice. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J, Erez E (2004) Communication in sentencing: exploring the expressive and the impact model of victim impact statements. Int Rev Victimol 10:223–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JV, Manikis M (2010) Victim impact statements at sentencing: exploring the relevance of ancillary harm. Can Crim Law Rev 15:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders A, Young R (2007) Criminal justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalek B (2006) Crime victims: theory, policy and practice. Palgrave-Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer J (2004) Criminal procedure: the rights of the victim versus the rights of the defendant. In: Cape E (ed) Reconcilable rights? Analysing the tension between victims and defendants. Legal Action Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate S (2001) The victims’ lobby. In: Ryan M, Savage S, Wall D (eds) Policy networks in criminal justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate S (2007) Perspectives on the victim and victimisation. In: Walklate S (ed) Handbook of victims and victimology. Willan, Cullompton

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams B, Goodman H (2007) The role of the voluntary sector. In: Walklate S (ed) Handbook of victims and victimology. Willan, Cullompton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolhuter L, Olley N, Denham D (2009) Victimology: victimisation and victims’ rights. Routledge-Cavendish, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Doak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Doak, J. (2014). Victims’ Rights in the Criminal Justice System. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_325

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_325

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics