Skip to main content

Measuring Crime Specializations and Concentrations

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 156 Accesses

Overview

Research on crime at places is a rapidly growing literature. Though Eck and Weisburd (1995) coined the term “crime at places,” the starting point of this literature was Sherman et al. (1989) in a microspatial analysis of predatory crime in Minneapolis. This research area finds that calls for police service are highly concentrated in very few places: 50 % of calls for police service are generated from 5 % of street segments (or less), particularly when one considers detailed crime classifications (Sherman et al. 1989; Andresen and Malleson 2011). Moreover, research has shown that spatial crime patterns at microspatial units of analysis vary significantly across crime classifications (Andresen and Malleson 2011). Because of this consistency, Weisburd et al. (2012) put forth the Law of Crime Concentrations.

One implication from this research is that opportunity surfaces for different crimes, though they may overlap, are different – the opportunity surface for a crime is the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   4,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   4,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading and References

  • Andresen MA (2006) Crime measures and the spatial analysis of criminal activity. Br J Criminol 46:258–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen MA (2007) Location quotients, ambient populations, and the spatial analysis of crime in Vancouver, Canada. Environ Plann A 39:2423–2444

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen MA (2009) Crime specialization across the Canadian provinces. Can J Criminol Crim Justice 51:31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen MA, Malleson N (2011) Testing the stability of crime patterns: implications for theory and policy. J Res Crime Delinq 48:58–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa B (1965) Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage. Manchester Sch Econ Soc Stud 33:99–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Block S, Clarke RV, Maxfield MG, Petrossian G (2012) Estimating the number of U.S. vehicles stolen for export using crime location quotients. In: Andresen MA, Kinney JB (eds) Patterns, prevention, and geometry of crime. Routledge, New York, pp 54–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1981) Notes of the geometry of crime. In: Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (eds) Environmental criminology. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, pp 27–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1993) Location quotients and crime hot spots in the city. In: Block CR, Dabdoub M (eds) Workshop on crime analysis through computer mapping, proceedings. Criminal Justice Information Authority, Chicago. pp 175–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1995) Location quotients and crime hot spots in the city. In: Block CR, Dabdoub M, Fregly S (eds) Crime analysis through computer mapping. Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, DC, pp 129–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1998) Mapping crime for analytic purposes: location quotients, counts and rates. In: Weisburd D, McEwen T (eds) Crime mapping and crime prevention. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, pp 263–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulwer HL (1836) France, social, literary, political, volume I, book I: crime. Richard Bentley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke RVG, Cornish DB (1985) Modeling offenders’ decisions: a framework for research and policy. Crime Justice Annu Rev Res 6:147–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44:588–608

    Google Scholar 

  • De Benedictis L, Gallegati M, Tamberi M (2009) Overall trade specialization and economic development: countries diversify. Rev World Econ 145:37–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck JE, Weisburd D (eds) (1995) Crime prevention studies, volume 4, crime and place. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank LD, Andresen MA, Schmid TL (2004) Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. Am J Prev Med 27:87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Herfindahl OC (1950) Concentration in the U.S. steel industry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman AO (1945) National power and the structure of foreign trade. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD, Summers L, Pease K (2009) Offender as forager? A direct test of the boost account of victimisation. J Quant Criminol 25:181–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney JB, Brantingham PL, Wuschke K, Kirk MG, Brantingham PJ (2008) Crime attractors, generators and detractors: land use and urban crime opportunities. Built Environ 34:62–74

    Google Scholar 

  • McCord ES, Ratcliffe JH (2007) A micro-spatial analysis of the demographic and criminogenic environment of drug markets in Philadelphia. Aust N Z J Criminol 40:43–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller MM, Gibson LJ, Wright NG (1991) Location quotient: a basic tool for economic development studies. Econ Dev Rev 9:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Quetelet LAJ (1842) A treatise on man and the development of his faculties. W and R. Chambers, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe JH (2001) On the accuracy of TIGER type geocoded address data in relation to cadastral and census areal units. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15:473–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe JH (2004) Geocoding crime and a first estimate of a minimum acceptable hit rate. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 18:61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe JH, Rengert GF (2008) Near repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Secur J 21:58–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengert GF (1996) The geography of illegal drugs. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman LW, Gartin PR, Buerger ME (1989) Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27:27–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil H (1967) Economics and information theory. Rand McNally, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd D, Groff ER, Yang S (2012) The criminology of place: street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin A. Andresen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Andresen, M.A. (2014). Measuring Crime Specializations and Concentrations. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_298

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_298

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics