Skip to main content

History of Boot Camps

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

Synonyms

Boot camps; Shock incarceration; Intermediate sanctions

Overview

Correctional boot camps are programs modeled after military basic training. Just like basic training, boot camps emphasize drill and ceremony, and physical activity. Generally, boot camps target young, nonviolent offenders with limited criminal history. Boot camps are almost always short-term programs lasting 90–180 days. Inmates who successfully complete these programs are released under supervision back to the community; however, inmates who drop out or are dismissed from the boot camps often are required to serve longer terms of incarceration in traditional correctional facilities.

Correctional boot camps in the United States emerged, proliferated, and receded with remarkable speed. In the early 1980s, boot camps emerged in two states. Soon thereafter, boot camps became a national phenomenon with at least one boot camp operating in the majority of states by the mid-1990s. Near their peak popularity, the boot...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 4,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 4,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading and References

  • Anderson JF, Dyson L, Burns JC (1999) Boot camps: an intermediate sanction. University Press of America, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin J (2000) Multisite evaluation of boot camp programs: final report. George Washington University, Institute on Crime, Justice, and Corrections, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gover AR, MacKenzie DL, Styve GJ (1999) Boot camps and traditional correctional facilities for juveniles: a comparison of the participants, activities, and environments. J Crim Justice 28:53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Gransky LA, Castellano TC, Cowles EL (1995) Is there a “second generation” of shock incarceration facilities? The evolving nature of goals, program elements, and drug treatment services in boot camp programs. In: Smykla JO, Selke WL (eds) Intermediate sanctions sentencing in the 1990s. Anderson, Cincinnati, pp 89–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurlychek M, Kempinen C (2008) Beyond boot camp: the impact of aftercare on offender reentry. Crim Public Policy 5:363–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Latessa EJ, Cullen FT, Gendreau P (2002) Beyond correctional quackery: professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment. Fed Probation 66(2):43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutze F (1998) Are shock incarceration programs more rehabilitative than traditional prison? A survey of inmates. Justice Q 15:547–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutze FE (2001) The influence of a shock incarceration program on inmate adjustment and attitudinal change. J Crim Justice 29:255–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutze FE, Brody DC (1999) Mental abuse as cruel and unusual punishment: do boot camp prisons violate the Eighth Amendment? Crime Delinquency 45:242–255

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DL, Armstrong GS (2004) Correctional boot camps: military basic training or a model for corrections? Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DL, Hebert EE (1996) Correctional boot camps: a tough intermediate sanction. United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DL, Parent DG (1992) Boot camp prisons for young offenders. In: Byrne JM, Lurigio AJ (eds) Smart sentencing: the emergence of intermediate sanctions. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, pp 103–122

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DL, Piquero A (1994) The impact of shock incarceration programs on prison crowding. Crime Delinquency 40:222–249

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DL, Shaw JW (1990) Inmate adjustment and change during shock incarceration: the impact of correctional boot camp programs. Justice Q 7:125–150

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DL, Brame R, McDowall D, Souryal C (1995) Boot camp prisons and recidivism in eight states. Criminology 33:401–430

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DL, Gover AR, Armstrong GS, Mitchell O (2001a) A national study comparing the environments of boot camps with traditional facilities for juvenile offenders. NIJ research in brief (NCJ# 187680). National Institute for Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DL, Wilson DB, Armstrong GS, Gover AR (2001b) The impact of boot camps and traditional institutions on juvenile residents: perceptions, adjustment, and change. J Res Crime Delinquency 38:279–313

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DL, Mitchell, O, Bierie D, Van Brakle M, O’Neill L, Franke D, Mitchell F (2004) A randomized study of the Maryland correctional boot camp for adults: final report. Unpublished manuscript, College Park

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DL, Bierie D, Mitchell O (2007) An experimental study of a therapeutic boot camp: impact on impulses, attitudes and recidivism. J Exp Criminol 3:221–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathlas RES, Mathews JW (1991) Boot camp programs for offenders: does the shoe fit? Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 35:322–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Morash M, Rucker L (1990) A critical look at the idea of a boot camp as a correctional reform. Crime Delinquency 36:204–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Parent DG, Snyder RB, Blaisdell B (1999) Boot camps’ impact on confinement bed space requirements: Final report to National Institute of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon J (1995) They died with their boot on: the boot camp and the limits of modern penality. Soc Justice 22:25–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcomb JB (1999) Recovering from the shocking reality of shock incarceration: what correctional administrators can learn from boot camp failures. Correct Manag Q 3:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Styve GJ, MacKenzie DL, Gover AR, Mitchell O (2000) Perceived conditions of confinement: a national evaluation of juvenile boot camps and traditional facilities. Law Hum Behav 24:297–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DB, Mackenzie DL, Mitchell FN (2005) Effects of correctional boot camps on offending: a Campbell collaboration systematic review, Campbell Collaboration. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ojmarrh Mitchell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mitchell, O. (2014). History of Boot Camps. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_277

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_277

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics