Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

Agent-Based Models to Predict Crime at Places

  • Nick MallesonEmail author
  • Andrew Evans
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_208

Overview

Crime occurrences are driven by a complicated mix of distinct influences, including those of the environment, the surrounding social context, and personal behavior/psychology of the people who could influence a crime event. Agent-based modelling is a methodology used in computer simulation that concentrates on individual-level behaviors and is ideally suited to modelling crime. This is particularly true of crimes such as burglary or street crime, which are heavily influenced by environmental factors and by the behavior of individual people. In an agent-based crime model, virtual “agents” are placed in an environment that allows them to travel through space and time, behaving as they would do in the real world. This entry will discuss why the crime system is such an ideal candidate for agent-based models and will review a number of crime models that have recently arisen.

Introduction

Individual crime occurrences are caused by a complicated mix of factors, including – but not...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Andresen M, Malleson N (2011) Testing the stability of crime patterns: implications for theory and policy. J Res Crime Del 48:58–82Google Scholar
  2. Bonabeau E (2002) Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(90003):7280–7287Google Scholar
  3. Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1993) Nodes, paths and edges: considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. J Environ Psychol 13(1):3–28Google Scholar
  4. Brantingham P, Brantingham PJ (2004) Computer simulation as a tool for environmental criminologists. Secur J 17:21–30Google Scholar
  5. Castle C, Crooks A (2006) Principles and concepts of agent-based modelling for developing geospatial simulations, UCL working paper series. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Chainey S, Ratcliffe J (eds) (2005) GIS and crime mapping, 1st edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke RV (1995) Situational crime prevention. Crime Justice 19:91–150Google Scholar
  8. Dray A, Mazerolle L, Perez P, Ritter A (2008) Policing Australia’s ‘heroin drought’: using an agent-based model to simulate alternative outcomes. J Exp Criminol 4(3):267–287Google Scholar
  9. Eck JE, Liu L (2008) Contrasting simulated and empirical experiments in crime prevention. J Exp Criminol 4(3):195–213Google Scholar
  10. Eck JE, Weisburd D (1995) Crime and place, volume 4 of crime prevention studies. Criminal Justice Press, MonseyGoogle Scholar
  11. Edmonds B, Moss S (2005) From KISS to KIDS: an ‘anti-simplistic’ modelling approach. In: Davidsson P, Logan B, Takadama K (eds) Multi agent based simulation. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 130–144Google Scholar
  12. Elffers H, van Baal P (2008) Realistic spatial backcloth is not that important in agent based simulation research: an illustration from simulating perceptual deterrence. In: Eck JE, Liu L (eds) Artificial Crime Analysis Systems: Using Computer Simulations and Geographic Information Systems. Information Science Reference, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans A (2011) Uncertainty and error. In: Heppenstall AJ, Crooks A, Batty M (eds) Agent-based models for geographical systems. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilbert N, Terna P (2000) How to build and use agent-based models in social science. Mind Society 1(1):57–72Google Scholar
  15. Groff ER (2007) Simulation for theory testing and experimentation: an example using routine activity theory and street robbery. J Quant Criminol 23(2):75–103Google Scholar
  16. Groff E, Mazerolle L (2008) Simulated experiments and their potential role in criminology and criminal justice. J Exp Criminol 4(Special Issue):187–193Google Scholar
  17. Hayslett-McCall K, Qui F, Curtin KM, Chastain B, Schubert J, Carver V (2008) The simulation of the journey to residential burglary. In: Liu L, Eck J (eds) Artificial crime analysis systems: using computer simulations and geographic information systems. Information Science Reference, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu L, Eck J (2008) Artificial crime analysis systems: using computer simulations and geographic information systems. Information Science Reference, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  19. Macal CM, North MJ (2005) Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB, Joines JA (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 winter simulation conference. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, pp 2–15Google Scholar
  20. Malleson N, See L, Evans A, Heppenstall A (2010) Implementing comprehensive offender behaviour in a realistic agent-based model of burglary. SIMULATION. Published online before print: http://sim.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/10/20/0037549710384124
  21. Malleson N, Evans A, Heppenstall A, See L (2011) Crime from the ground-up: agent-based models of burglary. Geogr Compass (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  22. Moss S, Edmonds B (2005) Towards good social science. J Artif Soc Soc Simulat 8Google Scholar
  23. O’Sullivan D, Haklay M (2000) Agent-based models and individualism: is the world agent-based? Environ Plann A 32(8):1409–1425Google Scholar
  24. Schelling T (1969) Models of segregation. Am Econ Rev 59:488–493Google Scholar
  25. Wooldridge MJ (2009) An introduction to multiagent systems. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of GeographyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK