Overview
Although police performance measurement has gotten increased attention in recent decades (Shane 2007; Fleming and Scott 2008; Davis 2012), it has been a longstanding concern of scholars and policy makers (Lind and Lipsky 1971; Parks 1971). The ability to measure how well the police are performing is central to notions of police effectiveness, accountability, reform, and the current emphasis on evidence-based policing. Without accurate performance measurement, aspirations toward implementation of strategic policing, scientific policing, and a new approach to police professionalism (Weisburd and Neyroud 2011; Stone and Travis 2011) are mostly rhetoric, not reality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Recommended Reading and References
Abrahamse AF, Ebener PA, Greenwood PW, Kosin TE (1991) An experimental evaluation of the Phoenix Repeat Offender Program. Justice Quart 8:141–168
CALEA (2012) Standards for Law Enforcement Agencies: The Standards Manual of the CALEA Law Enforcement Accreditation Program, Fifth Edition as revised. Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Gainesville, VA
Cordner G (1978) Open and closed models of police organizations: traditions, dilemmas, and practical considerations. J Police Sci Administr 6(1):22–34
Davis RC (2012) Selected international best practices in police performance measurement. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
Eterno JA, Silverman EB (2012) The crime numbers game: management by manipulation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Fleming J, Scott A (2008) Performance measurement in Australian police organizations. Policing: J Policy Practice 2:322–330
Henry VE (2002) The Compstat paradigm: management accountability in policing, business and the public sector. Looseleaf Law Publications, Flushing, NY
Hoover LT (ed) (1998) Police program evaluation. Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, DC
Langworthy RH (1999) Measuring what matters: proceedings from the Policing Research Institute meetings. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
Lind RC, Lipsky JP (1971) The measurement of police output: conceptual issues and alternative approaches. Law Contemporary Prob 36:566–588
Martin SE, Sherman LW (1986) Selective apprehension: a police strategy for repeat offenders. Criminology 24:155–175
Moore MH, Braga A (2003) The bottom line of policing: what citizens should value (and measure) in police performance. Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, DC
Parks RB (1971) Measurement of performance in the public sector: a case study of the Indianapolis Police Department. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
Reaves BA (2011) Census of state and local law enforcement agencies, 2008. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC
Shane JM (2007) What every chief executive should know: using data to measure police performance. Looseleaf Law Publications, Flushing, NY
Stone C, Travis J (2011) Toward a new professionalism in policing. New perspectives in policing. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
Sunshine J, Tyler TR (2003) The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law Soc Rev 37:513–548
Weisburd D, Neyroud P (2011) Police science: toward a new paradigm. New perspectives in policing. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cordner, G. (2014). Measuring Police Unit Performance. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_189
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_189
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law