Skip to main content
  • 374 Accesses

Introduction

Few topics have persisted in holding our attention like that of human freedom. Questions pertaining to free will have pervaded philosophical and theological writings and imbued works of popular culture at least since the time of Plato. Psychological agency, “the freedom of individual human beings to make choices and to act on these choices in ways that make a difference in their lives” (Martin, Sugarman, & Thompson, 2003, p. 1), follows in this long tradition of concern with human freedom.

Definition

A variety of perspectives on agency exist (discussed below), and as such, there is no consensually agreed upon definition of agency. Although the literature on agency converges around shared themes, there is considerable variation in matters of emphasis and treatment of relevant features such as action, choice, reflection, affect, free will, intentionality, embodiment, creativity, resistance, imagination, and/or self-determination. In spite of these differences, however, there...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aboulafia, M. (1986). The mediating self: Mead, Sartre, and self-determination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Psychological Sciences, 1, 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary, P. (2007). A brief history of the concept of free will: Issues that are and are not germane to legal reasoning. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 25, 165–181. doi: 10.1002/bsl.748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frie, R. (Ed.). (2008a). Psychological agency: Theory, research and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frie, R. (2008b). Navigating cultural contexts: Agency and biculturalism. In R. Frie (Ed.), Psychological agency: Theory, research and practice (pp. 223–240). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. (1989/1960). Truth and method (2nd Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1927/1962). Being and time. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (Eds.). (2000). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, J. E. (1999). Place and experience: A philosophical topography. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2006). Sociocultural perspectives in educational psychology. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 595–614). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & Gillespie, A. (2010). A neo-Meadian approach to human agency: Relating the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective-coordinating persons. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44, 252–272. doi:10.1007/s12124-010-9126-7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Sugarman, J., & Hickinbottom, S. (2010). Persons: Understanding psychological selfhood and agency. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Sugarman, J., & Thompson, J. (2003). Psychology and the question of agency. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. (2000). Gender and agency: Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cumberland, RI: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, J., & Sokol, B. (2012). Human agency and development: An introduction and theoretical sketch. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1995). Philosophical arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanchar, S. (2011). Participational agency. Review of General Psychology, 15(3), 277–287.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin Thrift .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Thrift, E. (2014). Agency. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics